Samy

@samy@eupolicy.social
222 Followers
369 Following
6K Posts

Generalist. Career adventurer. Worked last 2 decades in IT. Architect by training. Now in IT portfolio management.

❤️ travel, ❤️ 🇪🇺, ❤️ design, 🇩🇪🇬🇧🇫🇷🇳🇱, empathy, processes, sustainability.

Struggling with the general ignorance of most people in regards to most things.

Covid is still here. It is still damaging your immune and vascular systems. Protect others if not yourself, and wear a mask.

I’m only funny in real life, but greatly appreciate your online humour!

PronounShe/Her
CatsJosette (15), Puppa (21)
LanguagesDE, EN, NL, FR
Identifies as🇪🇺European, 🐈‍⬛🐈 lover, 🚲& 🚂 rider, human

That - very, very precisely - is #CrossBorderRail

It’s Szentgotthárd 🇭🇺 - Neuheiligenkreuz 🇦🇹 (in that order - Hungary left, Austria right)

Try and come for my marriage, you goons. Just try.
Sind die Menschen jetzt an oder mit Hunger gestorben?
Who’s gonna tell them? 🙄
Wie Oberverkäufer, US-Milliardär und Konzernchef Alexander Karp dafür sorgt, dass #Palantir eine Black Box bleibt. Der Dokumentationsfilm „Watching You“ von Klaus Stern porträtiert ihn und seine gefährliche Firma https://taz.de/ARD-Doku/!6099626/
ARD-Doku: Die gefährliche und umstrittene Welt von Palantir

Erstmals schaut ein Dokumentarfilm auf den US-Milliardär Alex Karp und seine umstrittene Firma. Gut so, denn Palantir schadet der Demokratie.

TAZ Verlags- und Vertriebs GmbH

I (too) rarely post on Mastodon... But here I would be very grateful if you could help me disseminate these job offers for three PhD and two Postdoc researchers positions (in Belgium), on ‘Land use, Sustainability, and Democratic Backsliding’
https://landsystems-lab.earth/news/25-07-30-ludemo-phd/
https://landsystems-lab.earth/news/25-07-30-ludemo-postdoc/

And please encourage enthusiastic and skilled candidates to apply! We value diversity, inclusivity and creativity and we encourage applicants from diverse backgrounds to apply.
#geography #phd #postdoc #sustainability #LandUse #research #democracy #environment

Ich hab nicht mehr viele Erwartungen an die #Gruenen, aber Steigbügelhalter für die digitale Vollüberwachung zu sein, hätte ich ihnen nicht zugetraut!
https://systemli.social/@anneroth/114946976515836777
Anne Roth (@anneroth@systemli.social)

"Bürgerrechte-Partei" „Die Polizei in Baden-Württemberg darf künftig die umstrittene Software der US-Firma #Palantir nutzen. Die #grün-schwarze Landesregierung hat sich auf eine Gesetzesänderung geeinigt.“ https://www.zdfheute.de/politik/deutschland/polizei-baden-wuerttemberg-palantir-software-usa-datenschutz-100.html

Systemli
Die Landesanstalt für Kommunikation hat gegen uns wg. eines kritischen Satzes über die mangelnde Strafverfolgung von NS-Verbrechen in einem Feature über das toskanische Bergdorf Sant’ Anna di Stazzema, wo Mitglieder der Waffen-SS über 560 Menschen ermordeten, ein Verwaltungsverfahren angestrengt, das nun nach sechs Monaten endlich eingestellt wurde. Der Fall zeigt, wie verbissen deutsche Behörden auch 80 Jahre nach der Befreiung von Auschwitz allen Lippenbekenntnissen zum Trotz noch an der deutschen Schuldabwehr arbeiten. Wir meinen, dass Täterschützer beim Namen genannt werden müssen. Folgende Passage stoß der LFK auf: „2002, also weitere 6 Jahre später, wurden die Ermittlungen von Oberstaatsanwalt Bernhard Häußler in Stuttgart übernommen. Dieser verschleppte die Ermittlungen, um das Verfahren nach 10 Jahren mangels Tatverdacht einzustellen. Die Täter alterten unbehelligt, 7 von 14 Beschuldigten waren 2012 schon verstorben. Häußler ermöglichte die Einstellung des Verfahrens, indem er die Taten als verjährenden Totschlag bewertete und keine individuelle Schuld feststellte. Nach dieser juristischen Auslegung habe sich das Massaker mutmaßlich spontan vor Ort ereignet.“ #Pressefreiheit https://rdl.de/beitrag/lfk-f-hrt-verfahren-gegen-rdl-wegen-sendung-ber-unges-hnte-ns-verbrechen
LfK führt Verfahren gegen RDL wegen Sendung über ungesühnte NS-Verbrechen

Die Landesanstalt für Kommunikation (LfK), die u. a.

Radio Dreyeckland

@falcennial ooh ooh ooh, I have a joke for this :

Two people are tied up in a basement, a pessimist and an optimist. The pessimist starts crying and says "It couldn't possibly get any worse than this"

The optimist chuckles and says, "Oh yes it can!"

×
THIS IS A GODDAMNED LEGAL AGREEMENT FFS DOCUSIGN

@brianboyer last time it gave me that prompt I tried it (on a legal agreement) for fun, since I figured it'd probably get details hilariously wrong.

Instead it gave me a summary that was approximately "this is a [type of legal agreement] with lots of terms in it" which, while not wrong, was less informative than the document title 😂

I wonder if this reflects the attention span of the executives pushing these features. They can't bring themselves to read more than 20 words so they assume nobody else can either?

@adrake @brianboyer okay, but we talk about a service that scrolls down the view to the next required signature place if you fill out one, so the user experience was already a bit low.

when I'm reading through a contract and see a yellow marker I naturally want to fill it out and continue the reading, but they either think nobody reads these documents or nobody at DocuSign uses their own platform because the site hijacks my viewport and jumps down - this is the exact opposite what I'd want 😠

@pcdevil @adrake @brianboyer Yes, they think that no one reads the documents, I'm pretty sure
@pcdevil @brianboyer my own workflow is that I carefully read the doc in its entirety first, before I sign any part of it. So when I do start signing I do find it helpful to jump to the next thing that needs it; on paper I'd be flipping to the next page with a "sign here" sticky note on it (if the contract was big enough for that to be useful). I think the UX feels pretty polished for that, but as somebody who normally hates having my viewport hijacked I 100% understand the frustration if that's not your workflow!

@adrake @brianboyer absolutely, that's also a valid flow!

I think a good middle-ground would be that "jump to next" would require one more click by default:
that way your usage would be still easy to achieve but I don't feel myself clicking and scrolling 🙄

@pcdevil @brianboyer oh yeah totally! I was mostly responding to the "they think nobody reads the docs", that's certainly a possibility but anther possibility is they over-optimized one specific workflow.
@adrake @pcdevil @brianboyer Same here. Or, more often I got a preview of the document before signing, which I can review and potentially request changes or additions.
@brianboyer This is becoming a "survival of the fittest" moment in himan history.

@brianboyer 'Summarize in moments"?! Like anything I do in docusign is something I want to have a keepsake for? Weird.

Most things I've done in Docusign are closer to Eastman Moments than Kodak Moments.

@brianboyer Bullet point for investors. That's all it is. People will use it of course, but that doesn't mean it was meant to be.
@brianboyer If DocuSign is trying to talk me into not reading all of a legal agreement, then it's in good company alongside a lawyer I hired once, regarding his own contract.

@brianboyer

If any company handed me this, I would be immediately referring it to the state bar association which probably has questions regarding confidentiality and practice of law without a license.

@brianboyer
In former life I’d signed 100+ Non-Disclosure Agreements. I read them all, mostly similar, but one was the wrong type, which i refused and pointed out. BUT this illustrates more general problem, waste of time (but good for lawyers) on fairly standard agreements.
It would have been far better to have a few standard NDAs (#1,#2, etc) with a few fill-in-the-blanks, rather than requiring careful review. I.e. “we use NDA#2, with fill-ins highlighted. Do these work for you?” Done.
@brianboyer @pluralistic I’m so tired of companies trying to bolt this kind of thing on. Even if AI worked amazingly, if someone wants to use OpenAI to review a doc, they can go and use ChatGPT.
@brianboyer the pure idea of DocuSign needing AI summaries is so wild to me.
@brianboyer It tried to summarise my one-page PDF train ticket, ha.
@eobeara @brianboyer my poor mother in law (82 years old) struggled with the recipes for her bank account. Stupid Adobe PDF viewer on her iPad tricked her via dark UI pattern to create "AI" summaries of those recipes...
@eobeara @brianboyer those were also one pagers (single transaction recipes). And of course the resulting PDF contained the wrong numbers

@eobeara @brianboyer

Clearly the AI is not that intelligent if it can't determine what needs summarizing and what does not

@brianboyer I wonder if it would be possible to make a contract that would (to actual lawyers unambiguously) give me the entirety of a company, while worded in a way that makes ai summarize it into, idk, getting me a pay cut or whatever will convince CEOs to sign
@brianboyer Summary of EULA nonsense would be nice. Who even reads that shit?
@brianboyer
I've told more than one company that I would not use Docusign. This has come with mixed responses ranging from sending me the documents through the post to ignoring my refusal and proceeding as if I had signed the document.
@brianboyer my landlords letting agents tried to force us to use this, they were very unhappy when we refused
@brianboyer “How does this agreement disadvantage me?” would be something AI should help with…
@brianboyer
Yeah as if that is going to fly in court. I have an issue that I signed a contract but the actual wording was different than what I was told I was buying from my financial adviser, and I find out 11 years later, when the shit hits the fan. But I know, that since I signed the contract, I'm not in a great position.

@jodiem

I dunno, have you seen the courts lately?

@brianboyer Oh this just gave me the best LOL! I work with nonprofit Board(s) and when I see that AI summary my eye starts twitching. So. Much. Work. goes into Board Materials - the AI summaries just KILL ME.
@brianboyer It still works:
* You want to try Disney Plus;
* You barely read a legal document you were never truly prepared to understand in the first place;
* Years later your significant other dies from a preventable cause In a Disney park;
* You try to die them;
* They blame you and counter sue you with the basis of a legally binding contract with you signed years ago and it protects a huge corporation against individual persons;