117 Followers
288 Following
144 Posts
In pursuit of #beauty, #nature, #science, #sustainability, #justice, #fairness, and especially #music

@pj

:-) When I pointed out the analogy between #LLM training and biological #evolution, I wasn’t referring to biology’s ability to evolve language, but its capacity to develop almost anything at all: given enough tuneable parameters and a system for inheritance with variation under selective pressure, we get molecular rotors, nanofabrication, diffraction gratings for colours, magnetic compass, eyes, ears, labyrinths, social collaboration … and even language.

The number of tuneable parameters in the human genome is almost two orders of magnitude smaller than the number of parameters in GPT-3 (and less precise: only 2bit / four nucleotides). And training a language model means to follow a trajectory in a high-dimensional parameter space, just like evolution is a trajectory in genetic-sequence-space. (The technical difference is that the former is a directed walk along a gradient, while the latter is a random walk under selection).

And what happened is : when trained on token-prediction, LLMs started showing emergent aspects of “intelligence”.

Quanta just ran an article on that five days ago: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-unpredictable-abilities-emerging-from-large-ai-models-20230316/

… and Google’s Jason Wei, who has a number of articles on arXiv on emergence, lists emergent abilities on his blog: https://www.jasonwei.net/blog/emergence

Molecular biology is one of my areas of expertise, I am not surprised this is happening: how could it not? But then again, to actually see such emergence is profound.

#Sentientsyllabus #ChatGPT #GPT4 #Bard #ai

The Unpredictable Abilities Emerging From Large AI Models | Quanta Magazine

Large language models like ChatGPT are now big enough that they’ve started to display startling, unpredictable behaviors.

Quanta Magazine
(Publication thread 🧵 )
New publication alert🚨: This paper is a result of a collaboration with John Wiens that started as my PhD rotation project.
Here we provide first phylogenetic support for the haplodiploidy hypothesis. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1118748/full
(1/n)
Does haplodiploidy help drive the evolution of insect eusociality?

Understanding the evolution of eusociality in insects has been a long-standing and unsolved challenge in evolutionary biology. For decades, it has been suggested that haplodiploidy plays an important role in the origin of eusociality. However, some researchers have also suggested that eusociality is unrelated to haplodiploidy. Surprisingly, there have been no large-scale phylogenetic tests of this hypothesis (to our knowledge). Here, we test whether haplodiploidy might help explain the origins of eusociality across 874 hexapod families, using three different phylogenetic comparative methods. Two of the methods used support the idea that the evolution of eusociality is significantly associated with haplodiploidy, providing possibly the first phylogenetic support for this decades-old hypothesis across insects. However, some patterns were clearly discordant with this hypothesis, and one phylogenetic test was non-significant. Support for this hypothesis came largely from the repeated origins of eusociality within the haplodiploid hymenopterans (and within thrips). Experimental manipulations of the data show that the non-significant results are primarily explained by the origins of eusociality without haplodiploidy in some groups (i.e., aphids, termites). Overall, our results offer mixed phylogenetic support for the long-standing hypothesis that haplodiploidy helps drive the evolution of eusociality.

Frontiers

Please leave the leaves. And make a vow: no more leaf blowers!

#Nature #Bees #Biodiversity

Dog whistle to English dictionary:

Soros - Jews
Coastal elites - Jews
New York values - Jews
Hollywood liberals - Jews
Globalists - Jews
International bankers - Jews
American Jews - Jews who dare question Israel’s government

I hope you enjoyed this week’s Jews Clues

The confluence of this technology with the information ecosystem that we described in our paper from a couple of years could be an epistemic catastrophe.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2025764118

I’m coming to think that releasing these tools was a reckless act with the potential to generate negative externalities we have barely started to imagine.

The threat isn’t rogue superintelligence. It’s bullshit at unprecedented scale, reflected back upon itself and iteratively amplified.

Time for a new an expanded introduction. Escapee from twitter: Burned out on following #politics, #journalism, #news, but I'm still paying attention. Always interested in #science, #biology, #animalbehavior, #animals, #insects, #photography, #nature, #travel, #music, #songwriting, #cognition, #evolution, #ecology, #cognitivescience, including #AI, #ChatGPT, #GPT4, #animalcognition, #evoeco,
@jonny not sure how to best get access to that if you're not subscribed, but I guess you can see their archive.
Here is the link organised by thread (it all started with a message by Terry Sejnowski titled "Chomsky's apple"): https://mailman.srv.cs.cmu.edu/pipermail/connectionists/2023-March/thread.html
The Connectionists March 2023 Archive by thread

I came up with the definitions for the familiar objects by asking GPT to define them prior to the experiment. "Clapizoid" is totally made up.
Another #GPT4 #ChatGPT experiment: matching words to definitions, where some words and some definitions are unfamiliar. If there is one unfamiliar object and one unfamiliar definition, humans (and dogs) can match them. So can GPT4