Causal foundations of bias, disparity and fairness

The study of biases, such as gender or racial biases, is an important topic in the social and behavioural sciences. However, the literature does not always clearly define the concept. Definitions of bias are often ambiguous or not provided at all. To study biases in a precise manner, it is important to have a well-defined concept of bias. We propose to define bias as a direct causal effect that is unjustified. We propose to define the closely related concept of disparity as a direct or indirect causal effect that includes a bias. Our proposed definitions can be used to study biases and disparities in a more rigorous and systematic way. We compare our definitions of bias and disparity with various criteria of fairness introduced in the artificial intelligence literature. In addition, we discuss how our definitions relate to discrimination. We illustrate our definitions of bias and disparity in two case studies, focusing on gender bias in science and racial bias in police shootings. Our proposed definitions aim to contribute to a better appreciation of the causal intricacies of studies of biases and disparities. We hope that this will also promote an improved understanding of the policy implications of such studies.

What was healthcare like before the NHS?

Historian Dr Steve Thompson, who appeared on Ruth Jones' episode of Who Do You Think You Are?, explains how our ancestors accessed healthcare before the National Health Service

Metaphors of EdTech | Welcome to TeachOnline

Criticisms leveled at online education during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed not only a lack of understanding about how educational technology (EdTech) can be deployed effectively, but a lack of imagination. In this special briefing, Dr. Martin Weller uses metaphors to encourage different perspectives and new ways of thinking about EdTech. With metaphors as a mental model,

Our Story: An Ancillary to US History – Simple Book Publishing