…“The final part will take the lens of the first two and help us explore what all this means for the future of humanity and earth.”

Series setup ends.

- - -

What follows is a 14-post transcript of part 1 of the series:

https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/frankly-original/135-oil-101

Oil 101: What You Actually Need to Know About Oil - The Great Simplification

This week’s Frankly is the first in a three-part series on the role oil plays in modern civilization, prompted by the recent flow disruptions and geopolitical conflict surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

The Great Simplification

#Oil101: 1/14

“Most people’s mental image of oil comes from a cartoon of dead dinosaurs turning into goo, which we put in our car.

In reality, oil formed from dead marine phytoplankton, algae that captured solar energy tens of millions of years ago, that was then compressed by heat and pressure over geological time, creating a super energy-dense liquid substance, which we refine.

It was a solar battery that took millions of years to charge, and we’re draining it in centuries…

#Oil101: 2/14

…“And coal and natural gas are a similar story.

So how much work does this ancient sunlight actually do for us?

A barrel of oil replaces 5 years of human labor for around $100. It used to be $50.

A single barrel of oil contains 1,700 kilowatt hours of work potential. A healthy human being doing physical work generates around 0.6 kilowatt hours per day, depending on how strong a person is or what the task is, or how many hours a day they work or how efficient they are…

#Oil101: 3/14

…“Anywhere from 1 to 20 years of human labor is replaced when a barrel of oil is combined with machines. So for an average human 5 years is a solid approximation.

This incredibly powerful economic subsidy is indistinguishable from magic on human timescales. Here’s a way to actually feel this…

#Oil101: 4/14

…“The next time you drive, imagine running out of gas and pushing your car home. Even with 3 or 4 friends a single gallon of gasoline that cost you $4 would take you and your buddies weeks to replace with human muscle and would be hella unpleasant in the process.

We never think about this. We just swipe the credit card and go places. And all we pay is the cost of pulling it out of the ground, not the millions of years to create it, not the environmental cost of burning it…

#Oil101: 5/14

…“This makes oil absurdly cheap relative to the work it performs.

Economic textbooks and business school classes teach that energy’s contribution is its dollar price tag, in effect. The cost share of oil is equal to the value it provides, but the cost we pay is orders of magnitude smaller than the value it provides for us. This is the deepest subsidy in the history of civilization, and it’s mostly invisible except in energy crises like now…

#Oil101: 6/14 #climateDiary

…“That is a single 42-gallon barrel of oil.

Now multiply it by the total amount we burn every year, and we’ll see what this looks like at scale.

We use around 100 billion barrels of oil-equivalent of fossil hydrocarbons per year, globally.

At around 5 years of labor per barrel, that’s 500 billion human labor year equivalents – running, working alongside around 5 billion actual human workers.

100 fossil-powered ghost workers for every living one…

#Oil101: 7/14

…“This giant labor subsidy when combined with machines is primarily what explained and underpinned the explosion of wealth globally.

It boosted wages.

It boosted corporate profits.

It slashed the price of goods and transportation, so things show up at your door the next day in a brown truck.

It’s supercharged agriculture to increase our population from 1 billion to 8 billion, and it dramatically increased per capita consumption…

#Oil101: 8/14

…“On top of that. Every economic miracle of the last 150 years was underwritten by this invisible workforce.

What does this actually look like at an individual level?

Oil alongside gas and coal has made the average person significantly richer than historical royalty.

The average American uses roughly 40 barrels of oil equivalents of oil, gas, and coal combined, compared to a global average today of around 10 barrels of oil per person…

#Oil101: 9/14

…“That level of energy service with the associated billions of helpers surpasses what kings and queens had access to a few centuries ago:

- hot water on demand
- refrigeration
- personal travel by car
- global travel by plane
- year round, fresh food
- climate-controlled sleep conditions

all from ancient sunlight, powering the research, the innovation, the manufacturing, the infrastructure, the factories, the transport, the supply chains, and the commerce all around the world…

#Oil101: 10/14

…“And yet almost no one sees it.

That’s because we swim in energy the way a fish swims in water.

Every product, every service, every bit of GDP first requires an energy conversion, no exceptions.

The average American home has around 40 items constantly plugged in, draining power around the clock, even when they’re turned off.

But because energy has become abundant and growing our entire lives, we have become… energy blind…

#Oil101: 11/14

…“I got my master’s at the University of Chicago and my 3 Nobel Prize winning professors never once mentioned the word energy as a contributor to economic productivity because during their lifetimes, the supply just kept growing.

So they treated this exceptional period of human history as if it were normal based on ingenuity and technology…

#Oil101: 12/14

…“Here’s one way to feel how blind we are to this.

Your body needs around 2,000 kilo calories a day to stay alive. But the average American – when you count all the energy consumed on their behalf through heating and transport and manufacturing and lighting, and food systems and supply chains – uses roughly 200,000 kilo calories a day. A hundred times more than our bodies require…

#Oil101: 13/14

…“Most of us wake up in a climate-controlled room and we flick on a light switch and turn on hot water for a shower, and we make a coffee and put on synthetic clothes. All possible from oil and hydrocarbons.

You are living at a metabolic rate that no organism in the history of life on Earth has ever sustained, and almost none of it is visible to us in our cultural stories in the media…

#Oil101: 14/14

…“This all sounds like a miraculous gift, and in many ways it is.

Here’s the kicker.

This ultra cheap energy in the form of coal, gas, and especially oil, will not be available to us forever at today’s price and scale, and it may well be gone sooner than we expect.

We’ll explore this in part 2 of our intro trilogy on oil.”

- - -

End of transcript of part 1 of https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/frankly-original/135-oil-101

Oil 101: What You Actually Need to Know About Oil - The Great Simplification

This week’s Frankly is the first in a three-part series on the role oil plays in modern civilization, prompted by the recent flow disruptions and geopolitical conflict surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

The Great Simplification

#Oil101 Postscript:

The irony that I’ve corrected, edited and then posted the above with ease due to The Great Simplification’s team using an LLM to translate their audio signal into text is not lost on me.

Part 2 in the series is already out, but I’ll defer that until tomorrow.

Have a good Saturday. Please integrate the above into the awareness of you and yours 💚

…The transcript above represents 10 minutes of audio across 14 posts for #Oil101.

I’ve just prepped the equivalent for part 2, which is close to 50% longer, and in segmenting it into coherent blocks it will make 27 posts.

I’ll post it tomorrow under the #Oil201 hashtag if you want to follow along – or the opposite, to mute it!

…I said yesterday I would do this, so here goes. Follow or mute or ignore #Oil201.

As a follow-on to #Oil101 above, the following 27 posts are the words of Nate Hagens from the 14 minutes of https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/frankly-original/136-oil-201

Oil 201: What Happens When the Oil Stops Flowing - The Great Simplification

This week’s Frankly is the second in a three-part series on the role oil plays in modern civilization, prompted by the recent flow disruptions and geopolitical conflict surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

The Great Simplification

#Oil201: 1/27

“In the last part [#Oil101], we explored what oil is and how it’s effectively acting as invisible fossil pixie dust through many of our lives.

But the parallel associated risk is that we have built everything: our institutions, governments, stories and expectations about the future on this cheap energy input. And now its scale and affordability is no longer guaranteed…

#Oil201: 2/27

…“When energy prices spike, entire systems can become fragile and often break because oil’s been so cheap, pretty consistently. The economic logic has been to imagine and then engineer thousands of mechanical processes around that cheapness.

The industrial evolution is really the story of adding hundreds or thousands of units of fossil energy to tasks that humans used to do by hand…

#Oil201: 3/27

…“A dairy farmer milking cows by hand was limited to a few dozen animals. Modern industrial dairy applies enormous quantities of diesel, electricity, refrigeration, and transport to the same basic task producing. Orders of magnitude more milk at a much lower price and higher profits, but importantly at a very different cost sensitivity.

The energy payoff of processes like this is terrible in pure physics and efficiency terms, because lots of energy is wasted…

#Oil201: 4/27

…“However, the *financial* payoff has been enormous because the primary input to the process is energy that effectively costs almost nothing.

This is why energy price spikes hit so hard in the global economy.

Our processes around the world were designed around cheap energy, especially oil…

#Oil201: 5/27

…“Even at $500 a barrel oil would still be a remarkable gift for the work it performs for us. But our current industrial system could not function at anything close to those prices because every margin, every business model, every supply chain was calibrated to cheap, stable energy inputs.

The margins were always thin and when cheap energy turns expensive, the margin disappears and often turns negative…

#Oil201: 6/27

…“And nowhere would this be more consequential than in the thing we all do three times a day…

Eat.

To some of you, this might sound like an exaggeration, but when we sit down for a meal, what most of us are really eating is processed fossil fuels.

Contrary to all of human history, our food system now runs in energy deficit and a huge one at that.

Roughly 10 calories of fossil hydrocarbons go into every one calorie of food on your plate…

#Oil201: 7/27

…“The tractors run on diesel. The fertilizer comes from natural gas, the pesticides from petrochemicals, and the food is packaged and shipped on trucks and container ships and kept cold the entire way. And here’s the truly staggering part…

Roughly half the nitrogen in your body today carries a chemical signature from the Haber Bosch process, which makes synthetic fertilizer from natural gas. That single industrial process is what allows us to feed about 4bn of our 8 bn humans…

#Oil201: 8/27

…“And beyond food, our clean water pumping, treating, desalinating and distributing also all requires fossil fuel inputs.

So when people say oil and gas, most think of our cars. We should also be thinking of groceries and dinner.

But even food is only one part of the story. Oil is woven into virtually everything we touch…

#Oil201: 9/27

…“Only about 40% of a barrel of oil becomes gasoline. The rest is diesel, jet fuel, heating oil, bunker fuel, asphalt, and feed stock for roughly 6,000 other products like medicines, plastics, surgical devices, synthetic clothing, electronics, contact lenses, tents, kayaks, the interior of our cars, and the list goes on.

The assumption that electric cars would eliminate our need for oil misses the overwhelming majority of what non-gasoline oil actually does…

#Oil201: 10/27

…“And these products are woven into global supply chains now of extraordinary complexity. Tiny invisible components. Each with its own petrochemical ancestry, each manufactured somewhere, shipped somewhere else, assembled somewhere else, and only then is it shipped to the stores and to us.

When people talk about supply chain disruptions, what they usually mean at the root is energy and material disruptions, which brings us to why geography is destiny…

#Oil201: 11/27

…“The United States sits on ancient ocean beds once filled with water and life millions of years ago, ultimately resulting in immense reservoirs of oil and gas, which is a primary reason why the USA has produced and consumed more oil than any country in history.

But remaining ‘conventional’ reserves are mostly concentrated elsewhere.

Around 60% of the world’s remaining conventional oil sits inside a 600 mile triangle in southwest Asia, AKA, the Middle East…

#Oil201: 12/27

…“Much of [that 60%], around 20% of global oil supply – which is around 40% of what’s actually available for purchase internationally – passes through the narrow strait of Hormuz, which has become the center of the world’s attention for the last few weeks.

And as we’re quickly realizing there are no alternative routes at anything close to that capacity, and now we’re seeing a war for its control…

#Oil201: 13/27

…“A side note here. People like to blame Exxon and Shell and the like for both oil price spikes and climate change, and so on.

The reality is that only about 12% of global oil reserves belong to publicly traded oil companies.

The other 88% belong to national oil companies like Saudi Aramco, Rosneft, and the national companies of Iran, Iraq, China and Venezuela.

So swapping out Exxon’s executive for Greenpeace leadership would change almost nothing about global oil production…

#Oil201: 14/27

…“Oil is a story of nations and geology, not corporations. So the oil is concentrated in a few places, many of which are the center nodes of global conflict today.

But there’s a deeper problem.

Earth’s crude oil isn’t running out – well, technically it’s always been running out – but today’s availability and low priced oil is running out faster than most people and our financial system realizes…

#Oil201: 15/27

…“Most people are unaware of the depletion rate at which we’re drawing down and drying up oil fields and wells.

It’s accelerating.

Especially in the United States, conventional oil globally has been on a production plateau for about 15 years. Exxon itself shows existing global production will decline to 10 to 20% of its current level if there’s no new drilling or tertiary extraction…

#Oil201: 16/27

…“The growth in global oil of the last decade or so is mostly from US shale, but shale is a fundamentally different beast.

We widened the straw with fracking technology, so it looks like plenty is flowing, but we have to drill more.

We have to drill deeper and faster just to keep production flat, and that brings us so much closer to the eventual slurping sound from the straw, because shale oil is found in the source rock, which is where all the other oil migrated from…

#Oil201: 17/27

…“and after that, there’s nothing left.

Okay. Some of you might be thinking that I’ve been ignoring other forms of energy throughout this brief analysis: hydro, nuclear, and especially solar and wind, but there’s a reason substitutes can’t simply step in.

Energy quality matters almost as much as energy quantity.

Oil is liquid at room temperature, energy dense, portable, and storable. And these qualities are what made modern civilization possible…

#Oil201: 18/27

…“Replacing oil isn’t a matter of just matching kilowatt hours from another source.

Our entire mining, shipping, rail, trucking, and personal transport system runs on oil.

And despite the headlines about solar and electric vehicles, that is likely not going to change.

But here’s a key distinction.

Energy is the total amount of work available. Power is the rate at which you get that energy per unit of time…

#Oil201: 19/27

…“Biological creatures on Earth do not optimize for energy. We optimize for power.

Organisms and economies that get more energy sooner out-compete those that don’t.

Oil and its products – like gasoline, diesel, heating oil and jet fuel – contain unbelievable power when burned. They give us ginormous work *fast*, and importantly, whenever and wherever we want it…

#Oil201: 20/27

…“Wind and solar deliver energy intermittently when the sun shines and the wind blows. Sometimes giving an enormous power burst, but sometimes giving us nothing, especially depending on your location.

Nuclear power can give us a constant stream of high power, but it’s difficult to ramp up and down and requires connection to a larger grid and is capital intensive and costly…

#Oil201: 21/27

…“Alternative energy sources will play a role in the human energy portfolio, but our current system was built around the qualities of oil.

These time, land and material dimensions are almost never discussed, but they’re some of the main reasons that direct substitution is so much harder than people assume, and why there are now warships in the Persian Gulf…

#Oil201: 22/27

…“So if oil is this hard to replace, what is this energy transition?

We keep hearing about solar panels and wind turbines but they do not reproduce themselves. The sun and the wind are renewable, but the technology we use to harness them is best labeled ‘rebuildable’, not renewable.

Because they require massive inputs of material and energy and complexity to build, and they need to be rebuilt every 20 or 30 years…

#Oil201: 23/27

…“Most alternative energy tech only produces electricity, which is very important, but represents only a fraction of what fossil hydrocarbons do in the world – currently around 20%.

Diesel for shipping, jet fuel, aviation, petrochemical, feedstocks, none of these have clean substitutes at scale.

But beyond these limits, there’s a deeper pattern. The current popular stories of an energy transition are built upon a myth, a false narrative about the history of humans and energy…

#Oil201: 24/27

…“The reality is we have never in human history fully transitioned off an energy source. We always *add*.

There’s a name for this pattern. It’s based on Jevon’s paradox.

When we find a more efficient way to use a resource, we don’t use less of it. We use *more*.

Coal efficient steam engines didn’t reduce coal consumption. They made coal available for more things, so demand exploded…

#Oil201: 25/27

…“The same pattern has played out with almost every energy efficiency gain since.

- LED light bulbs use less electricity per bulb, so we put them everywhere.
- Fuel efficient engines made driving cheaper, so we drove more and built suburbs further out.

Paradoxically, in the same way that you will spend most of your pay raise, energy efficiency doesn’t shrink our demand.

It expands the bounds of what we can extract. It actually *feeds* our demand…

#Oil201: 26/27

…“This is why technological efficiency alone cannot solve an energy and resource problem.

So the deeper question is about what happens when there might be less energy overall.

And here’s where we are:

- Cheap energy builds complex systems.
- Complex systems depend on cheap energy.
- When energy gets tight, complexity unravels.
- Current alternatives cannot replace what cheap oil does *at the scale and speed* that our current system requires…

#Oil201: 27/27

…“In the final part of this trilogy, I’ll explain what all this means for money, for civilization, and for what comes next for us as individuals and societies living through the down slope of…

the carbon pulse.”

- - -

Transcription ends for

https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/frankly-original/136-oil-201

Oil 201: What Happens When the Oil Stops Flowing - The Great Simplification

This week’s Frankly is the second in a three-part series on the role oil plays in modern civilization, prompted by the recent flow disruptions and geopolitical conflict surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

The Great Simplification

#Oil201 postscript.

When I posted the transcript of #Oil101 yesterday, part 3 was not yet out, so I hadn’t listened to it.

But I since have.

It’s longer again than its preceding 2 parts, and it doesn’t have answers. It seeks to clarify the predicament we are in, in the hope that we might throw off our delusions of *more*.

Where it leaves us is unavoidably really hard work. And I’m not yet decided if I will add #Oil301 to this thread

Well, I’ve decided now not to do for #Oil301 what I did today for #Oil201 and yesterday for #Oil101.

I’ll probably post some excerpts from Nate’s part 3, but I’ll draw more from https://lifepod.transistor.fm/episodes/s01e00-an-introduction-to-lifepod/transcript because how Adam is framing our moment is more enabling, more agency affirming, more practical 💚

Lifepod | Transcript: S01e00 An introduction to Lifepod

Host Adam Greenfield welcomes you to Lifepod with an overview of the show’s themes and central concerns, rooted in his book Lifehouse: Taking Care of Ourselves in a World On Fire (Verso, 2024). In ...

Lifepod

…Coming back to this thread with just a few excerpts from #Oil301’s 2,000 words or so. The whole of it would make another 27 posts, but I’ll be taking a detour and ending up in a better place.

But first, to tie this in with the above…

From Nate Hagens:
The World After Cheap Energy
https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/frankly-original/137-oil-301

#Oil301: 1/n

“This is the third and final part of this series, briefly covering the basics of oil. From what it is, to how we’ve built our civilization around it and why it can’t last. And now in this one, we’ll look to the future of our systems in a world with less. Everything I’ve described is part of a single phenomenon for a brief window in geologic time…

Oil 301: The World After Cheap Energy - The Great Simplification

Today’s Frankly is the final installment in a three-part series on the role oil plays in modern civilization, prompted by the recent flow disruptions and geopolitical conflict surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

The Great Simplification

#Oil301: 2/n

…“Humans have discovered, accessed and burned through an extraordinary one-time inheritance of ancient stored sunlight. I call this…

the carbon pulse…

a bell curve stretched out over around 300 years.

We’re somewhere near the peak right now, and what’s unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz may prove to be a marker of that peak or an accelerant past it on the way up…

#Oil301: 3/n

…“The carbon pulse gave us abundant cheap energy to power modern civilization population growth from 1 billion to 8 billion – industrial agriculture, global supply chains, modern medicine, electrification, the internet, air travel, and the complexity of modern governance.

The human economy measured by people times, goods and services per person is now 1,000 times bigger than 500 years ago…

#Oil301: 4/n

…“This is the lens that’s missing from virtually all mainstream economic and political discussions and analysis.

We are making long-term plans, taking on long-term debts, building long-term institutions and financial systems, all based on the assumption that the energy and material largesse at the top of the carbon pulse is a permanent plateau.

It isn’t.

It goes up and it will come down, likely soon…

#Oil301: 5/n

…“The down slope has implications for every dimension of civilization, but especially our economic system. The economy runs on energy and material flows full stop.

We think it runs on money, but money is just a marker, a claim on the real physical work. And when money is created, it does so without referencing how much oil or gas or forests or copper or orangutans or butterflies exist in the world…

#Oil301: 6/n

…“As events in the world cause oil to get more expensive or less available, or both, we will respond out of necessity by governments and central banks, offering guarantees, writing checks, printing more money.

Yes, we can and will print money.
But we cannot print energy.

We can only extract it faster, and extracting it faster requires us to print more money. It’s kind of a biophysical Ouroboros.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros

Ouroboros - Wikipedia

#Oil301: 7/n

…“The current growth-based financial system and its Byzantine array of financial claims is all predicated on having more ‘affordable’ energy every year, and the entire structure of debt, interest and repayment assumes a future that is bigger and materially richer than today.

When the energy supply contracts, those monetary claims don’t just take a time out. They crack, along with the associated bonds and currencies and markets…

#Oil301: 8/n

…“We’ve been drawing down the principal of the main input to our economies, but our universities, stories, institutions and media treat it as if it were interest.

The geology of shale has punishing rapid depletion, constant drilling just to stay *flat*.

What’s less discussed is that shale is as much a financial phenomenon as a geological one.

Cheap money made expensive oil temporarily viable. And when capital tightens or interest rates rise, the financial scaffolding collapses”

…Ok. So far, so bleak.

The rest of #Oil301 is mostly just ramming home the point about *where we are* without actually getting into “what comes after”.

Crucially, it’s that last bit that @adamgreenfield narrates so beautifully on his recently launched Lifepod: https://lifepod.transistor.fm/episodes/s01e00-an-introduction-to-lifepod/transcript

Lifepod | Transcript: S01e00 An introduction to Lifepod

Host Adam Greenfield welcomes you to Lifepod with an overview of the show’s themes and central concerns, rooted in his book Lifehouse: Taking Care of Ourselves in a World On Fire (Verso, 2024). In ...

Lifepod

…Adam addresses the bleak too, but since we’ve already gone there above, I’ll skip to where he opens the path ahead instead of cognitively closing it:

Adam 1/n:

“Maybe we could learn to think of this time of climate-system breakdown not as something that happens to us, but as something we can actively intervene in, and for the better.”

…These are excerpts, not read-ons.

Adam 2/n:

“What’s harder to imagine is making shelter against the hard times that’s capacious enough for everyone who needs it. That chooses trust in our own strength over passivity, invitationality over exclusion, and love over fear.

That both calls on and nurtures qualities in us we’d almost given up any dream of developing, and maybe even tutors us in joys we’d never thought to claim as our own.”

…Adam 3/n:

“The answer I keep coming up with — and maybe, if you’re here, that’s your answer too — is… speaking from experience, I at least don’t think the state is terribly likely to be there for us, in the way we need it, in this time of #longEmergency.

And that leaves us, and whatever care and shelter and power we’re able to make for ourselves, together.”

…Adam 4/n:

“If we want to survive the hard times to come together, we need to stop investing our faith and energy in institutions that are demonstrably failing us.

We need to admit that we’ve reached a moment at which we can no longer afford to wait for some external process to save us, whether mechanism, movement or deus ex machina.

What we need, in other words, is to get beyond hope. We’ve got to stop waiting for someone else to do something and start doing for ourselves.”

@urlyman Well, you say we cannot print energy, but we kind of can...

https://www.theecoexperts.co.uk/solar-panels/printed

The Complete Guide to Printed Solar Panels in 2025

Printed solar panels are set to revolutionise your home. Here's what they are, their current efficiency, and when they'll be on the market.

The Eco Experts

@statsguy power generation potential, not energy

https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/116324851873215519

@urlyman Yeah. Printed solar panels are not going to solve all our problems, for sure. But still, looks like an interesting technology to watch.

@urlyman This graph is a delusion. The curve doesn't work like that.

There may still be a way to continue to extract fossil hydrocarbons for another 150 years, but it would have to be done by robots. There won't be any humans, any mammals, any warm blooded creatures left to do it.

In which case, what is the point?

The point is this: the true right hand side of that graph is a cliff, and we are teetering on the edge of that cliff right now.

#ThereIsNoPlanetB
#ThereIsNoEconomyOnADeadPlanet

@urlyman I know that you and I do not fundamentally disagree. I'm just responding to points in posts!
@urlyman There are some interesting thoughts in this thread. But we feel pretty sure that renewables are the actual "cheap" energy - both in terms of production costs and in terms of less damage to the environment.
Nate's take on this is so frustrating. He speaks (correctly) about the coming "simplification" (meaning a reduction in energy consumption), but doesn't seem to get that *electrification* solves a significant part of the problem...

@clanger9 I don’t get that from him. What I get is that electrification hype is utterly mismatched with the scale and time within which to engineer it. And that framing seems reasonable to me.

Just this morning, I can see the inherent fragility and counter-productivity of that grand plan playing out in the UK: read up from https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/116402252969316213

@clanger9 What I really value are people who are focusing on practical implementations of electric infrastructure in ways that are closely aligned with the future we’re creating.

See for example this brilliant talk which I’m only 10 minutes into https://tv.lumbung.space/w/nzuB248U2LQA1LCn7vYmER

Neighbourhood-First Software: the open web without expecting everyone to self-host - Jade Ambrose

PeerTube
@clanger9 My frustration with Nate’s part 3 is that it makes the case for the bleakness without *also* making the case for how we meet it with love and joy and learning. And that’s why when I get to it later this week my main appending to this thread will be from Adam Greenfield’s narrative instead
There is a mismatch, this is true. I wouldn't say it's "utterly" mismatched, though. Electrification isn't simple or straightforward, but it's *certainly* do-able. The the fact that not everybody benefits on day one (or the benefits are unevenly distributed during the transition) isn't a reason to hold back. This is the case for any transition (including the coming "simplification", if Nate is correct...)
@urlyman Thrilled you are picking up what I’m laying down.
@urlyman
Probably the most critical part.
e.g. "What happens when civilizations lose their primary energy source. They turn to wood. ... Most states would be stripped bare of trees within a year or two on the down slope of the carbon pulse. The world's forests are at risk from both climate change and human desperation. Same cause, same story. "
#EnergyDescent #Hagens
@markhburton yes indeed. But it’s less pithy than parts 1 and 2 and I think people like @adamgreenfield, who I was also listening to yesterday, are saying it better.
@urlyman Thanks so much for this series. I’m watching it in the thread because I don’t understand spoken English. But what I’m missing is another massive dilemma. Burning the remaining fossil fuels would almost certainly render most of this planet uninhabitable due to climate change. Even at current rates, roughly 70 years from now, 20% of the planet will be uninhabitable—and that includes areas with very dense populations. Supports the argument that we’re burning valuable resources for energy.

@plsik you’re welcome. And thanks for the follow. Your English seems great and infinitely better than my non-existent Czech.

Nate, whose words I’m transcribing, has been campaigning on the side of climate science for 20 years.

His key message is that we’ve been surfing on a carbon pulse that has made us tragically blind to the scale of our energy use.

And that if not now, then very soon, the only way to climate and biodiverse safety is through radically lower energy use. Part 3 lays that out

@plsik I’ll probably post something from Nate’s #Oil301 tomorrow but perhaps not the whole thing

@urlyman the never transitioning off/use more is verifiably incorrect.

1) we’ve largely transitioned off using animal dung as an energy source (I’m sure it’s used in some very rural contexts, but certainly not using more)
2) peat as an energy source is fading away
3) whale oil as an energy source is gone (really using all animal oil directly, outside a small % of recycled biofuel)

Unless you get massively broad, like oil == any oil from any source not just like FFs, etc.

@linux_mclinuxface a point well made.

Fwiw, Nate’s shorthand is a reference to the work of Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, in particular with regard to wood, coal, ‘natural’ (fossil) gas and oil. Bearing in mind also that a resource not used explicitly for power generation is still providing a material input and therefore an energetic input of some kind.

https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/113967241980859092

…and for the sake of a shorthand it is clearly apt for the general paradigm of the last 3 centuries, especially the last 75 or so when economic growth has become the explicit goal of orthodox economics
@linux_mclinuxface @urlyman In some cases, supply ran out eg whales were over- fished. Whale oil was mainly used for lamps.

@anne_twain @urlyman whales still exist. We stopped using them for fuel because of environmental (extinction) threat.

The thread on oil specifically talks about lighting as energy usage.

I don’t think we widely used whale oil->electricity but it was definitely used by Inuit peoples for heating fuel.

@linux_mclinuxface They do? You mean those humpbacks I've seen off the coast of Australia weren't plastic blow- ups?
@anne_twain har har. I’m just saying the supply didn’t run out, policy stopped the usage.

@linux_mclinuxface I live in South Australia. When a British colony was first established here in the 1830s, whaling and export of whale oil to Britain was meant to be its main source of income. But the number of whales was already dwindling and the plan was abandoned, though some small scale whaling continued for a while. This over-fishing was the reason the whaling industry here wound down in the 19th century. The movement to ban whaling worlwide occurred about 100 years later.

The context of the post you replied to was the different fuel types that have been used by the Western world historically and the reasons they've fallen out of use.

@urlyman Yes, but this is irrelevant, too, because this time we can't: we're up against a hard limit imposed by the laws of physics. We're heating our planet beyond what is habitable for us.

So we either abandon fossil hydrocarbons altogether, or we end complex life on Earth.

Full disclosure, I believe we're choosing the second option. Certainly, #UKLabour and the #SNP are.

#ThereIsNoPlanetB
#ThereIsNoEconomyOnADeadPlanet