@nixCraft
The problem is, the uninformed love it. The amount of meeting notes and emails that have been "I asked copilot to..." is scary. I'm the weird and paranoid one for refusing to use it at work, but at least I'm keeping my skills alive.
What will happen to those people when the bubble bursts, MS inevitably removes copyLot and they have to think for themselves again?
What makes you assumed that they were thinking in the first place ?
I have a lot of coworker that are very good at negotiation, or rewriting or following process, but they cannot think outside their little box.
I cant count the number of time where i got "this value here is wrong, it must be a multiple of that value" and they cannot explain to me what those values mean neither to explain how i'm supposed to compute them.
Of course they are right. But do they think ?
@Aedius @nixCraft
Because these people are otherwise very intelligent. They just don't know (or care) about the details and - more importantly - don't have the time to summarise a 1 hour meeting into notes.
That's how Microslop (and all the other AI bollocks) get you: convenience. Its easier to throw a meeting transcript into CopyLot and get a well written plausible looking summary. But we've already had it hallucinate a task no one asked for. But they don't see how sinister it is, they laugh
@Aedius @nixCraft
Its the same thing with cookies. It's easier to accept all and look at what you wanted (whilst giving away all your data).
I questioned my friend over it "well, they've already got my data, so what's the harm?" A LOT! "But all my friends and family are there" well maybe they shouldn't be?
Ease, convenience and too difficult to _not_ do it means people will continue giving away freedoms till its too late.
@scottmiller42 @nixCraft
Oh, I see. Yes, I know. Fortunately, ours isn't like that (yet), but a lot of our training is about AI this and AI that.
They're even considering getting AI to answer or filter emergency calls which boggles my mind.
I'd never shoot the messenger, I prefer civil discussion. If I didn't like what you said, I wouldn't engage (that's why I asked for clarification), so don't worry. 😊
@scottmiller42 @nixCraft
Oh, I totally get it and agree. Some people are a bit overenthusiastic (diplomatic speak) about certain topics 😉 And that's great, but I agree, there has to be a happy medium.
And JFC, I'm not saying I've _never_ used AI or think its *all* bad. I say I'm not anti-AI, I'm Anti-AI-Hype. My son read AI at uni and he doesn't trust it, so I trust him.
We need to get rid of these big tech corporations. They are starting to act against our interests.
That is the game of capitalism on which the USA are built upon. The big post WW2 IT techs are the ultimate culmination of it. Neoliberal capitalism where winner takes all... and the rest has nothing... like Standard Oil and its monopoly they should be stopped as we see how it does not end well...
The new generation of Silicon Valley actors are much more toxic than Microsoft btw...
Corporations are part of society, and they should act as such.
But we are in the endgame of neoliberal capitalism it seems, where winner takes all. A self-destructive strategy.
We have been there before, and we can change it again.
Standard Oil was once the world's largest monopoly, controlling Founded by John D. Rockefeller in 1870, it was broken up by the Supreme Court into 34 companies in 1911.
And by the way, tax them, for they are part of society.
@nixCraft
"Everybody"?
Do you know a single person who is actually still using Microsoft?
I don't fully agree. As much as I’ve come to hate Microsoft’s AI strategy and products: if you look at the share price over the last three years, it actually seems to be heading back towards a more ‘normal’ level
Microsoft has not been a software company for at least two decades.
The bulk of their profit is from managing their vast financial assets.