@neurovagrant Trust No one was on seemingly every poster.
What happened?!
@tecHunt Social media was a mistake.
Can we go back to IRC, web-rings, and ICQ? 👉 👈 
Autonomous agents designed to follow "instructions" regardless of source. So there is really no defense against "agent (command) injection" attacks.
😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱
@neurovagrant y'all remember the old demotivator memes from the early 2000s?
One of them read "None of us is as dumb as all of us." LLMs are non-deterministic balls of shit put together with the absolute dumbest takes from Reddit and StackExchange, thrown into that non-deterministic blender, to shit out what is probably the most awful code known to man. None of us is as dumb as all of us.
@da_667 oh my god, i remember those.
it came to pass. this can't be good.
@neurovagrant @da_667 I mean, there's still an outlier on the stupidity front.
The problem is they're the dictator with the 'most powerful military in the world.'
@rootwyrm @neurovagrant The minute his obituary is announced I'm just going to post the first sentences you see in the game, Brigador:
Great leader is dead.
Solo Nobre Must Fall
Welcome, Brigador
@da_667 @neurovagrant That one was Meetings from https://despair.com/collections/posters/products/meetings
I have a big lithograph of Idiocy (a ring of skydivers captioned “Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.”).
For a while, they sold a shirt labeled “Insecurity”.
@thejaysunday My team is chronically understaffed. During one of the “We know agile has never worked for IT infrastructure in the past, so we’ll be the first to make it work!” cycles, they put each of us on four or five different agile teams. Each one had a 45 minute standup every day. It was this incredible combination of every wrong way to do agile, all together.
And they wondered why none of the work my team does was getting done in a reasonable timeframe.
I still have the Potential one hanging in my office
ah yes. the demotivational posters. we had a mostly complete collection on the walls of a startup i worked at.
Oh wow. That brought back some memories
They also had a glass coffee mug with the text "the glass is now half empty" Loved that mug. Till it got dropped by someone :-/
Stupidly expensive to replace now (look it up) on eBay or such
Just in case you missed the LinkedIn Speak translator...
https://translate.kagi.com/?from=en_gb&to=linkedin&text=let%27s+go+
@neurovagrant
They distrust humans due to their fallibility and potential ulterior motives, while they believe 'AI' to be an objective machine.
It's a weird situation where they both anthropomorphise algorithms by ascribing intelligence and intent to them, while at the same time relying on the fact that they're algorithms as a reassurance that they are objective mathematical and logical tools.
It's cherrypicking the best of both worlds – simultaneously supposedly thinking and infallible.
@neurovagrant 'Zero trust' has always been about potentially nefarious human intentions and sabotage, and since so-called 'AI' cannot have intentions and are supposedly merely doing what they're told as they are programs, they are considered inherently trustworthy.
The problem is that they think of 'AI' in terms of a traditional program: we know what it does because we programmed it, so it cannot do anything it's not supposed to do, unlike a human.
They ignore the black-box nature of 'AI'.
The original Zero Trust paper said, basically: assume endpoints are compromised. Design your system such that a compromised endpoint won't doesn't impact your global security. It rapidly became: massively increase your attack surface by running a load of privileged code on every client that doesn't actually have the ability to make strong security claims and, if that code claims the device is compliant, treat it as completely trusted.
There's a reason I assume TRUST in Zero TRUST is an acronym for 'Thinking Rationally, Understanding Security and Threats'.