agile software developer of several decades
searchable at https://www.tootfinder.ch/
Is comprehension debt a real thing?
This graph was generated from 28 million CI workflows.
I'd say that's a "yes".
IT'S HAPPENING
GITHUB, THE FIRST ENTERPRISE CLOUD SOLUTION TO REACH ZERO NINES RELIABILITY
recurseUntilSuccess which is more of a prayer than an efficient architecture.“Your choice isn’t between risk and safety but different kinds of risk: choose well.”
I really needed to read @aworkinglibrary’s thoughts on finding our way out of workslop; maybe you do, too. https://everythingchanges.us/blog/mouthwords/
One final thing. Using AI to analyse legacy code bases - don’t. I know people who have tried and it gets it wrong. So wrong you may as well do it yourself.
Also it means learning doesn’t happen. It’s cognitive surrender, which is dangerous.
I'm pretty satisfied at this point that the true extent of "AI" use in software development has been massively exaggerated.
Sure, lots of devs are using LLMs. But there seems to be very little advanced use. It's mostly chat window stuff and occasional inline completion, to keep the boss happy.
It is, however, a massive distraction.
The story I keep hearing from devs is that they tried doing the agentic stuff, looked at the results, and recoiled in horror.
And while there's no shortage of people trying to get it to work at scale, I've seen no credible evidence that *anybody* has cracked it.
So big claims, for sure. But backed up by nothing.