« Another weekend, another weekend of negative wholesale #power prices this time across most of #Europe. Basically from 11.00-17.00 today most countries from #France to #Finland will have power prices of zero or below. » #RePowerEU
https://twitter.com/gerardreid14/status/1662356280042766336
Gerard Reid on Twitter

“Another weekend, another weekend of negative wholesale #power prices this time across most of #Europe. Basically from 11.00-17.00 today most countries from #France to #Finland will have power prices of zero or below.”

Twitter
« It’s an increasingly common phenomenon as Europe races to build more cheap solar farms to cut demand for fossil fuels. Intraday prices in Germany, the region’s biggest power market, turned negative from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. on Tuesday, according to data from Epex Spot SE. » https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-04/power-prices-drop-below-zero-as-solar-output-surges-in-europe
European Power Prices Go Below Zero Again as Solar Output Surges

European power prices fell below zero again as production from solar farms overwhelms the grid early in the afternoon.

Bloomberg
Interesting post from Siemens Energy on their off-shore wind Power-To-X experiments and the various deployment models. https://spectrum.ieee.org/green-hydrogen-2663997448
Wind-to-Hydrogen Tech Goes to Sea

Siemens Energy is leading a coalition of 32 organizations, called H2Mare, which is developing the technology to produce green hydrogen out at sea

IEEE Spectrum

☀️⚡️ Everyone in Switzerland agrees we need more solar. But often, there's disagreement about where to put the panels without impacting the landscapes too much.

🛤️ Looking back, this one is a no-brainer, why not lay them down between train rails: there's already a strong connection to the grid, and it's infrastructure that's already ‘built’.

🇨🇭 First segment of the tracks got inaugurated today in canton Neuchâtel.

https://www.rts.ch/info/regions/neuchatel/2025/article/la-premiere-centrale-solaire-sur-rails-a-ete-inauguree-dans-le-canton-de-neuchatel-28863275.html
Supplier: https://www.sun-ways.ch

#Solar #Trains #Railways

La première centrale solaire sur rails a été inaugurée dans le canton de Neuchâtel

C'est un projet inédit en Suisse: la première centrale solaire amovible sur une voie ferrée ouverte au trafic ferroviaire a été inaugurée jeudi à Buttes, dans le canton de Neuchâtel. Des trains voyageurs vont donc circuler par-dessus une installation photovoltaïque.

Radio Télévision Suisse
@fj We should definitely have this in the US, as soon as we have the means to keep drunken proud boys from tearing them up for spite.
@fj won't that be a challenge to keep them clean (and thus efficient) ?
@fabrice @fj here is the answer: "La propreté peut être garantie grâce à des systèmes de nettoyage sous forme de brosses cylindriques qui se place en queue de train."

@fabrice @fj

I would also be concerned with repairs. I have worked on rail-side equipment (hot wheel detectors) and we had to armor them quite well.

@resuna @fabrice @fj I can indeed imagine that there are a couple of practical issues with this concept of solar panels between the rails.
@fabrice @fj
I imagine they should be made resilient enough to scrub them with a dedicated train car on a scheduled basis, but I'm just imagining. I don't know the real challenges

@fj it's cute but even if you did all of it, 3800 km of standard gauge at 1.4mish wide with an energy density of roughly 100 W/m² gives you about 500 MW of power total, i.e. 10% of current (tiny) Swiss solar capacity.

You could get the same capacity by converting 0.03%(!) of Swiss agricultural land to solar.

@bovine3dom @fj I guess the panels need to be stronger than regular ones as well to protect against stones and such? And you'd need to stop traffic on a line if one needs servicing... Doesn't really sound like a good idea when there's still ample roof space that could be used instead.
@ives @bovine3dom @fj I am most worried about the extreme level of vibrations they will be subjected to. If it reduces their lifespan too much, they might not provide the energy used to build them. It feels way less stupid than the road version that was tried in France, but still I wonder what makes so many people want to challenge solar panels with mechanical stress and accessibility constraints.
@BrKloeckner @ives @bovine3dom @fj because they don't want solar power and therefore come up with ever new dumb ways to waste money
@BrKloeckner @ives @bovine3dom @fj It's research and development money. Most solar is fortunately installed in less vibrant environments, just doesn't make the news anymore.
@ives @bovine3dom @fj Ok, the positive points are the absence of transportation for electricity (used directly to power up the trains) and relative ease of deployment by a special train. We'll see how it goes, I guess.

@ives I'm not really convinced by roof solar, it's cute and fun, but installing solar on farmland is much cheaper and you can get an added ecological benefit by rewilding the land quite significantly, seeding meadows beneath and around the panels

https://solarenergyuk.org/news/wildlife-found-thriving-on-solar-farms/ (it's from an industry group, so take with a pinch of salt, but look at how gorgeous those meadows are...)

@fj

Wildlife found thriving on solar farms

Solar farms can be havens for biodiversity, says a new ecological survey

Solar Energy UK
@bovine3dom @fj Fine if you have the space for it. We definitely don't over here in Belgium; not sure what the situation is in Switzerland, where they're doing the rail thing.
@ives are you talking about a different Belgium to the one i am looking at because this one i could cover 90% in solar panels without a single person having to move
@bovine3dom 20% of what you're seeing is forest, and another 20% is buildings. Unless you're going to use rooftops and cut down all trees, I don't think you'll reach 90%.

@ives yeah, fair enough, sorry. i could only cover 80% of it in solar panels without a single person having to move. i had underestimated just how dense Belgium is - it is about 20% populated as you said.

I'm not keen on cutting down any forests so let's only cover 50% of Belgium in solar panels

that's 15,000km² which would be about 1,500GW - double the current total world capacity of solar

i really don't understand in what way you "don't have space" :)

@bovine3dom @ives In most provinces of Belgium, the majority of the agricultural land goes livestock grazing, an utterly wasteful activity. It can be eliminated without any impact on food security (since meat and dairy are useless) or income (since it's all loss-making subsidised business). (But it doesn't even need to be, as you can let sheep graze around the solar panels.) The average livestock grazing farm is 40 ha. How many landowners do you need to convert to solar?
https://www.atlas-belgique.be/index.php/en/digital-atlas/agriculture/
Landscape, rural areas and agriculture – Atlas of Belgium

@nemobis @bovine3dom @ives

It seems to me that livestock grazing is not incompatible with solar panels.

Solar farm trial shows improved fleece on merino sheep grazed under panels

Two farmers running merinos on solar farms in NSW's Central West say their sheep thrive under solar panels, while wool quality has increased.

ABC News

@resuna @nemobis @bovine3dom @ives More solar panels and a little less livestock would be the ideal combination.

The cows do however love the shade the solar panels provide.

@bovine3dom Rewilding isn't even necessary if you put up vertical both-sided agrivoltaic panels oriented north to south: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics

@ives @fj

Agrivoltaics - Wikipedia

@wonka @bovine3dom @ives @fj According to the Wikipedia page the image depicts: "Vertical solar panels, east to west orientation, with bifacial modules near Donaueschingen, Germany.[1]"

@alterelefant Facing west and east makes a line oriented north to south. I meant it like pictured there.

@bovine3dom @ives @fj

@bovine3dom @ives @fj the three big advantages of roofs are:
1. The ground is already sealed. You don t use roofs to do anything.
2. Under most roofs are already relative strong electrical acces points to the grid.
3. Most houses do consume as well electricity
@bovine3dom @ives @fj Roofs are a no brainer. They're (mostly) already sloped, and roughly half of all of them have one face sloped towards the sun for significant parts of the day; they're high, so tend not to be shaded; they don't often get walked on or disturbed; and they have to be clad in something waterproof anyway, so why not solar panel?

@simon_brooke @bovine3dom @ives @fj I'm all for solar on roofs, however, they are not a no brainer. They must be installed with at least enough intelligence to avoid things like this.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/i-would-like-to-have-them-off-my-roof-ontario-man-might-have-to-pay-20k-to-remove-solar-panels-from-his-roof/

‘I would like to have them off my roof’: Ontario man may have to pay $20K to remove solar panels

An Ontario man says he may have to pay $20,000 to remove the solar panels off the roof of his home—panels that he installed 12 years ago.

CTVNews
@bovine3dom @fj it says in the post: “But often, there's disagreement about where to put the panels without impacting the landscapes too much.” You might be right, but endless arguments would mean 0MW.

@stuartgale I'm not saying they shouldn't do it, I just wanted to add some perspective that was missing from the article :)

Switzerland is currently installing about 1500MW of solar power capacity a year so they're not doing horrendously badly. They could do more, especially since "overcapacity" in China means panels are extremely cheap at the moment. But it is thankfully far more than 0MW.

@bovine3dom @fj
Also factor in that they are at the wrong angle for optimally picking up light, and they are on the floor and going to get very dusty very quickly.

It is slightly less dumb than solar roadways, but only slightly.

@katrinatransfem @bovine3dom @fj Having trains run over them day in and out they will get super dusty very quickly. Doubt they will produce much electricity
@bovine3dom @fj
Absolutely always need the perfect be the enemy of the good. It is vital.

@fj The rail line near me carried iron ore pellets on a regular basis, and the hopper cars were leaky enough to litter the tracks with an abundance of 15 mm spheres.

Leaks of cargo and rail car lubricants could be a problem for roadbed solar panels.

@samloonie @fj
Wonder if this part will help eliminate enough of the mess most trains leave
"The Buttes project, in the Val-de-Travers, involves a section of about a hundred linear metres on a transN line. 48 solar panels have been installed. The electrical connections are secured inside the panels. Cleanliness can be guaranteed thanks to cleaning systems in the form of cylindrical brushes that are placed at the end of the train."
@fj As with any of the countles and infamous "solar roadways" projects the numbers and specific technical challenges make it not feasible. Would be nice if it where not so.

@micron
This one at least has the advantage that you don't need the same surface to provide both electricity and grip.

Either way, a tiny distraction in the big picture. Put solar in the fields, grow a screen of trees around, done.
@fj

@fj
This is like solar farms in the empty space of highway cloverleaf intersections. It is land which can not be used for much of anything else, so it's the ideal place for solar.
@LivInTheLookingGlass

@fj i think the Swiss railways are not very enthusiastic about this idea, for tracks maintenance (costs) and security reasons.
How much solar power potential is still not exploited on the roofs, where panels are not interfering with critical infrastructure? This idea doesn't look serious to me.

Edit: Switzerland uses only 10% of its roof solar power potential, per march 2025.
Source: https://www.rts.ch/info/environnement/2025/article/carte-interactive-explorez-le-potentiel-solaire-des-toits-de-votre-commune-28811100.html

Le potentiel solaire des toits de votre commune est-il bien exploité?

L'énergie solaire progresse en Suisse. Pour la première fois, la barre des 10% des surfaces de toits appropriées à l’installation de panneaux photovoltaïques a été dépassée. La carte et les graphiques de nos collègues de SRF montrent comment votre commune se situe par rapport aux autres communes du pays.

Radio Télévision Suisse
@fj this sounds like a really bad idea. As far as I recall the reason the rail ties are not fully submerged is also to disperse the sound caused by the pressure wave that runs in front of the trains. Replacing that with a flat, continuous surface would considerably alter the soundscape of the trains. 🤔
@fj oh and while the "strong connection to the grid" is undoubtedly true, it's (at least in germany) some 10kVs on 16 2/3 Hz, which probably has no market for inverters and therefore you'd need to step up the voltage twice, once from DC to 38V 3-Phase 50/60Hz, then to 30ish kV 16 2/3Hz. That sounds like an awful lot of waste...
@fj
I was just laughing last night with friends about the 15 year old "Solar Freaking Roads!" craze. Looks like if you insert the word "Rail" is the one way it actually wins versus Solar Freaking Canopies.
@fj I don't read french - any word on what they're doing about everything within several yards of a railroad track being completely covered by a thick layer of brownish-black dust in a matter of a few months?
@fj What why would you ever put them in the middle of the track at maximum vibration, when there is plenty of space all around the tracks?
@fj Someone will drive over that

@fj

Why not above the tracks? Why not over canals?

But best:
Why not under transmission lines?

Often already owned by the democracy, on lines connecting to need, could accept added wind generation too. And good land for smart grids.

https://www.swissgrid.ch/en/home/operation/power-grid/swiss-power-grid.html

Swiss transmission grid

Swissgrid is the owner of the Swiss transmission grid. Its grid is more than 6,700 kilometres long and transports electricity at a voltage of 380, 220 and 150 kilovolts.

@fj there are still some parts of Europe where not all trains have sewage tanks  But joke aside, it just feels like it would be exposed too much to mechanical damage
@fj it sounds like a good idea, but it's actually a terrible one. they would be much better suspended above the railway, but definitely not on the tracks.
@fj How nice that today, toilets don't release directly on the track any more.
@fj for the moment, it is an experiment that shall last 3 years minimum. I guess after 3 years, they'll have a good view of issues and positive points as well.
@fj solar frikking railways!?
@fj Terrible idea. Very high vibration and lots of dirt. Also makes maintaining the railbed much more difficult. And laying them in lines instead of squares seems really inefficient

@fj Solar panels are a very affordable way to generate electricity and should definitely be on every roof or flat surface available.

In general it seems like a good idea. I can think of a couple of practical reasons to maybe not install them in between rails. For track inspection or in case of any maintenance to the tracks the solar panels will have to be removed in order to avoid damage. This will create extra costs for track maintenance and may therefore not be feasible in every situation.

@fj That's interesting. I wonder how long they will last there.
@fj the most stupid place imaginable to mount solar panels; just short of airport runways and rocket launchpads. 🙄
@fj That is so neat! I wonder how they compensate for the vibration?

@fj this is the kind of innovation that we need more of.

Makes sense in places:
-where available land is limited
-where electrical infrastructure is nearby
-where other uses are not going to be restricted

Solar panels, like other silicon chips, are going to continue to become more efficient and cheaper, just like that PC of the ‘80’s that cost $6k and used a floppy disk for storage. Nobody thought they made any sense either…