back in my day we called this spyware
back in my day we called this spyware
"have you ever wanted to install a keylogger to spy on your spouse or kid? well have we got news for you"
@molly0xfff I can also hear workers unions and GDPR lawyers *screeching* over this one.
On the upside, it would be cool to get to do a full enterprisewide Windows-to-Linux migration for an org before I retire.
@subm3rge @molly0xfff Chances for a full Windows-to-Linux migration are good, at least in Germany.
The Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community has been working on openDesk for quite a while. Federal offices run Windows in a VM on secured Linux hosts and mostly anything important is a webapp running on Linux anyway. LibreOffice is the default in Schleswig-Holstein now(~30k desktops).
See a lengthy list of Linuxy things at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-Source-Software_in_%C3%B6ffentlichen_Einrichtungen#Deutschland
This will not end well for M$
@nyansen @subm3rge @molly0xfff
There are a few solutions.
But lets be honest Windows is dead for anything remotely secure if this spyware can't be easily removed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfx8MXkExLk
Genuine question: who is *asking* for these features? Is there any consumer/user of windows who's been requesting this?
That's truly all I've got too... I'm looking for some kind of counterfactual but it really seems that cynical so far.
@tveastman @molly0xfff As I understand it, there is a belief at the business strategy level (VC/shareholders/Cxx) that authentic user activity is the new commons which needs to be enclosed.
The old Internet, pre-generative AI, is gone and when a meaningful use for LLMs coalesces whoever controls the source of new training data will win at capitalism.
Claiming that data scraping is a feature which serves users is just a way to manufacture consent.
Glad to hear any less cynical explanations.
@molly0xfff Smh old boomer who can’t get on with modern tech
(for obvious reasons this is a joke)
I think spyware has been rebranded
@molly0xfff i think i also call this spyware.
Today.
In addition to being spyware, the software bloat is just unbelievable.
All I want is a machine that can do word processing. The occasional spreadsheet, and access to the interwebs. There's so much garbage running in the background now I need a machine more powerful than what we used to use to run helicopter simulators to literally do training. And this computer moved a 6 degree of freedom helicopter on hydraulics.
The bloat is absolutely ridiculous.
There's a spacecraft literally in outer space that is a fraction of the capacity of my laptop and my laptop takes 10 minutes to boot.
I probably should look into it. My current machine has specialty software used for some research that I can't ditch yet. Will look into this for the next.
Thanks!
And your laptop probably operates a million times faster than that spacecraft and still can't win that race.
But not just software bloat. Data bloat. I remember in the early days of audio and video editing thinking someone at Microsoft probably made a co-marketing deal with hardware disk vendors that they would give away such recorders for free just so that people would suddenly burn through tons of disk and need more hardware. Dunno if that was true, but it's easy to understand how it could be.
The problem with chromebook is that all of your work is on the cloud so that locks you into their storage and subjects you to them owning all your data/writing to train their stupid LLMs. Cloud storage is a brutal energy hog.
If web access is down, you can't really do much either.
The problem with big companies is that it inherently takes a lot of evil to become big and then we have no choices.
That headline is a near perfect summation of what M$ (and other big tech) has become...
Customer data is everything and the sale of same is what sustains companies and the interwebs...
🤡🫏🤡🫏
Step 5: Throw your Windows computer in the sink, add salt and hot water, marinate for one week.
Step 6: Go live in a faraday cage in the woods with no electricity - there is no hope for humanity any longer.
@molly0xfff No question this could be a violation of privacy. But that violation occurs only if the data is removed from the device. There are amazing potential scenarios with this data, with the very important caveat that it doesn't escape the machine. However I completely understand that people won't trust that this caveat holds. It's just unfortunate that we can't have a discussion of how much potential is indeed possible.
But knee jerk reactions will never allow this discussion to happen.
@TheEntity @scottjenson @molly0xfff
The protection is that it's bad with numbers. So people will ask it what your finances are, but it will confabulate different numbers.
OK, I'm just kidding, and it's pretty darned dark humor, but it raises another key issue: We sometimes analyze the risk today by saying "well, there's no way to make use of that now" but then someone makes an unrelated change that means there is a way, and then we don't go back and re-review the things we've let through.
So if we did stupidly rely on how bad these LLMs are with numbers and decide it was OK to see our financials, and then someone fixed its math, we'd have a danger we'd already let through. And it might not be obvious that the thing creating the danger was "We fixed math."