back in my day we called this spyware
back in my day we called this spyware
@molly0xfff No question this could be a violation of privacy. But that violation occurs only if the data is removed from the device. There are amazing potential scenarios with this data, with the very important caveat that it doesn't escape the machine. However I completely understand that people won't trust that this caveat holds. It's just unfortunate that we can't have a discussion of how much potential is indeed possible.
But knee jerk reactions will never allow this discussion to happen.
@TheEntity @scottjenson @molly0xfff
The protection is that it's bad with numbers. So people will ask it what your finances are, but it will confabulate different numbers.
OK, I'm just kidding, and it's pretty darned dark humor, but it raises another key issue: We sometimes analyze the risk today by saying "well, there's no way to make use of that now" but then someone makes an unrelated change that means there is a way, and then we don't go back and re-review the things we've let through.
So if we did stupidly rely on how bad these LLMs are with numbers and decide it was OK to see our financials, and then someone fixed its math, we'd have a danger we'd already let through. And it might not be obvious that the thing creating the danger was "We fixed math."
Probably because I thought your response was sarcasm, not literal. :)
Most people are in the opposite position, where there are tons of ways their data can leave their machine and they never know.
Given current tech, even if an LLM were armed with my financial data, the present state of the art might not be able to actually regurgitate it. It seems terrible with math. But that can't hold.
I hope that clarifies it. If not, well, just ignore me. :)
Oh definitely. So much more to be said on nuance but another time.