Welcome to the cycle of generative AI making search worse.
Quora uses ChatGPT which hallucinates an answer to a nonsense question.
Google Search picks up this nonsense answer from Quora which has high page rank and treats it as an instant answer.
Welcome to the cycle of generative AI making search worse.
Quora uses ChatGPT which hallucinates an answer to a nonsense question.
Google Search picks up this nonsense answer from Quora which has high page rank and treats it as an instant answer.
@thegarbagebird @mogul @carnage4life Agreed.
Professional users have always had to wade through absolute shit.
@selfisekai @carnage4life it doesn’t matter if they fix one query because if you rephrase it slightly it still gives the wrong answer.
If you ask why eggs melt it’s too polite to correct you.
Agreed, but reddit comes the closest. When I get annoying crap SEOing their way to the top of my search results, I always add "reddit" to the end of my query and usually get much more useful results. But I do miss the golden years of quora
I am stealing the phrase "corporate autoerotic asphyxiation."
@carnage4life I think I've never seen a company work so long and effectively at making their own core product objectively worse than Google has.
Google could, today, make a massive improvement to their product simply by going back to their 2005 search.
@april @ucblockhead @carnage4life
SEO nonsense reminds me of the aggregator problem search engines once had. You'd go looking for something and the top results were all pages directing you to the pages that hopefully had the answer you needed.
It's because of SEO that my important searches always have the search term "forum". Some forum board or old Reddit comment will have a good starting point for the rest of my search.
Can't wait until algorithms ding sites with too much SEO.
@ucblockhead @carnage4life "I think I've never seen a company work so long and effectively at making their own core product objectively worse than Google has."
Twitter would like you to hold their beer.
@juandesant @carnage4life people say to me, "but then people will lose trust in what we claim to be an authoritative source."
Me: "yes, and?"
@juandesant @carnage4life yes I recognize the slippery slope that entails.
My nuanced position is to ask yourself: is the trusted source delivering well sourced and reasonable information, or are there red flags telling me to be on alert?
As it stands the internet is so broken I sometimes call my boss if I don't think a message looks legit.
I'm interested in how many iterations it will take for the bullshit machine (chatgpt) to ingest its own product before the output is just gray entropy goop.