@erik I posted a big thing about this a while back but not only do we need personal websites, but people who have useful links to things they're interested in need to post them, and share other people's similar link lists, and copy each other's links for redundancy
I at least convinced a few people to go do it and felt good about that, my personal list is Palm related sites that take a lot of digging to find if you're trying to use Google, if you'll find them at all
@erik like why don't we use our social graphs to generate origin links for the spiders, and origins of the webranking value too..
Could also have a 'report' function, indicate sites which use chatGPT output or act too much like content mills. Like you can generate tonnes of pages, but so many domains is not so easy, and domains are _for_ tracking sources & reputation thereof...
Inevitably it's subjective. (as is status quo search results)
Mine moved a few times and went through a hiatus a few times, but it's been there for a long time and has been active again recently.
@erik yeah. It really felt like we had something pretty good there for a couple of decades.
I considered signing up for a paid for, advertising free search service that I found. I canβt even find the name of of it to share in a toot if I search βpaid searchβ now. Wow.
Agreed. I don't think the idea of Web search is broken so much as it's been subverted.
Maybe we need a search platform that detects SEO tactics and *downgrades* those results. Recognizes the hallmarks of AI-generated garbage and delists it. Ranks weighted by incoming link count, combined with recognition of junk domains so those links can't be faked.
I suppose that's not profitable, though...
@erik I was thinking similarly only yesterday. There was a time when if nothing filled your search criteria nothing was what you got. Now you just get screens and screens of irrelevancies, sometimes not even tangentially connected that "might interest" you, because they have to serve you *something* to hang adverts off.
That said, DDG, is still reasonably OK. No ads; not motivation to serve junk.
@erik
I absolutely agree that personal websites and public visible accesible Forums need to be revived again
But i also want to say that webrings&co can not be the solution for everything. Specifically when you are serachign for documentation, technical&mathematical papers, pointers abut niche interests, then webrings. You might see a round of Retro computer enthusiasts but never find a datasheet for a specific chip if you dont have a universal web search for that type number
@erik this article is relevant in this context:
πΈοΈπ