@pluralistic After spending several months on Bluesky and working with the protocol (on building a PHP library for it), I realized it’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Even if/when they do federate, the intent appears to be for large companies to run major portions of the protocol.

And Bluesky just converted to a C corp to take on venture capital.

I deactivated my account last week because I won’t get fooled again.

(I now have that song by The Who stuck in my head.)

The Who's Famous Won't Get Fooled Again Legendary Scream!!!!

YouTube
@Jwharrison @ramsey @pluralistic too cool, they are SO young there. Saw them in concert last year, didn’t move like that 🙃
@ramsey @pluralistic It looks like BS converted their corporate form from a "Public Benefits LLC" to a "Public Benefits C Corporation". However I'm not sure either of those things actually exists. It seems like they are trying to cosplay as a B corporation, which does exist.
@jef @pluralistic I read up on it a bit, and I’m by no means an expert, but yes, it’s a corporate structure that appears to cosplay as a “certified B” corp. As far as I can tell, the only requirement is that they define in their Articles the “public benefit” they provide, and they publish a yearly report on that benefit. The public itself has no stake in the company. The benefit Bluesky provides is the AT Protocol.

@ramsey @jef @pluralistic The only thing I've been able to discern is that Public Benefit corporations can explicitly have a mission and be profit-driven at the same time.

Probably the way this shakes out is that shareholders can't successfully sue for lack of value maximization when the company decides to do something good at the expense of optimal future profits.

I don't think there's anything that *requires* the corporation to follow that mission, just that it's *allowed* to. :-/

@timmc @ramsey @jef @pluralistic that's actually a pretty huge and important difference. "Maximising shareholder value" is an unfortunate maxim which has been disastrous for humanity as a whole.
@timmc @ramsey @jef @pluralistic Exactly right. I researched B corps just last month, and there is no duty, fiduciary or otherwise, to anyone besides shareholders. They can be as rapacious as any C corp.
@timmc @ramsey @jef @pluralistic
I was going register as a BCorp and went to their info session, did the assessment, & the parameters are such that you can qualify with very little actual public benefit being done. You get points in various categories, ones you don't care about or don't apply anyway, or do minimum. It can be weighted like offsets that get the approval, but still can cause major harms. I was disappointed as it is something you pay for like 'certified organic'.
The Who - Won't Get Fooled Again (Shepperton Studios / 1978)

The Who’s iconic anthem from 1971’s Who’s Next album performed here on B-Stage at Shepperton Studios on 25 May 1978 Filmed by Jeff Stein for the closing sequence of The Kids Are Alright. Sadly this was to be the very last performance ever by Keith Moon. 'All This Music Must Fade' from The Who's new studio album WHO, released on 6 December 2019. PRE-ORDER THE ALBUM NOW http://thewho.lnk.to/NewAlbumWE Follow us: https://www.instagram.com/officialthewho/ https://www.facebook.com/thewho/ https://twitter.com/TheWho #TheWho #WontGetFooledAgain #Live

TheWhoVEVO | Invidious
@laravista meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
@sspopovich @laravista Dorsey's beard did seem to grow longer overnight...

@BibbleCo

I suddenly got an idea for a cartoon character named Harry "Hairy" Pinocchio.

😄

@ramsey

@pluralistic

bluesky is twitter, run by the guy who owned twitter before Elon. Nothing more, nothing less

@ramsey @pluralistic the Musk “Blocks, might remove from users rights.” Huge surge to Bluesky. I woke up to an invite code from the app. Made an account to add some that I follow on Voldemort’s territory. Within hours, Dorsey posts agreement to “no block”. Felt like two billionaires had pwned both platforms.
@clairwil @pluralistic Well, to be “fair,” neither of them pwned the platforms. They both literally own them, in the very literal and not-at-all figurative sense.
@ramsey @clairwil @pluralistic I felt that they used those on both platforms as toys. Reminded me of cruel children herding ants around with a water hose, just to watch them run.
@clairwil @ramsey @pluralistic These are the same people who did that shit as kids, I guarantee you. Run. Don't put your data, content, resources, or time in their hands.
@ramsey @clairwil @pluralistic Dorsey has always been as bad as any of the others....
@ramsey @pluralistic yeah. I read some of jack.bsky.social's posts yesterday. I didn't have a good feeling.

@ramsey @pluralistic

One might say, "Nothing to see here folks, run along home now.", or perhaps, that statement is only true because it has been blatantly obvious and in the face of all of us directly involved since the very beginning.

I urge everyone to read this thread.

I've also posted it to the official #bsky-fediverse (Matrix & Discord) as well as any discussions in the #Fediverse_City room at https://matrix.to/#/#fediverse-city:matrix.org

There's no excuse for drinking that Kool-aid.

#tallship

.

You're invited to talk on Matrix

You're invited to talk on Matrix

@ramsey @pluralistic Also there’s literally nothing happening on Bluesky compared to Mastodon.

@alper
That strongly depends on the subgroup you want to see

in the recent weeks, Furries have 98% abandoned Fediverse, the only thing i read everywhere is
"has anyone a Blusky invite" or "i am now on Bluesky" "Fediverse is dead"

It hurts

@ramsey @pluralistic

@Laberpferd My feeds don't seem much less empty than they were. Some people have disappeared, but at the same time, others have joined. The best we thing we can do is keep using it, keep the community vibrant, and keep gently inviting people.

@alper @ramsey @pluralistic

@mathias @alper @ramsey @pluralistic
i do my best to keep life going here

But i can also say that i am following more than 1000 dead accounts, and almost anyone i would love to communicate has either left here or never wanted to be here

@ramsey @pluralistic well, three of the devs are nazis & one of the investors is a nazi so it's going about as expected
@Mordantivore @pluralistic Which 3 developers?
@ramsey @pluralistic I'd have to log into my account to see but 3 of em were liking nazis posting memes mocking people pissed about yet another anti-Black scandal
@ramsey @pluralistic Thank you. I have been mulling trying BlueSky, but there's no point. Dumping Xcrement, passing on Threads and Bluesky entirely. Sick of these greedy bastards and their unrelenting need to control everything and everyone.
@ramsey @pluralistic nay king, nay queen, nay master, we'll no be fooled again.
@ramsey if nothing else at least Bluesky and Threads (both truly spectacularly terribly names) keep big corporate interests at arm’s length from the fedi. At least for now.
@ramsey @pluralistic Poeple who think Bluesky would ever federate like Mastodon are naive. If they do, people could just make a super-mastodon that federates both with Bluesky and any ActivityPub service, allowing people to just skip the ads. Investors won't like that.
@karpour @pluralistic There are folks currently working on an ActivityPub bridge to AT Protocol. Bluesky has federation active in their sandbox environment, and supposedly, you can request access to develop against it. I’m not sure how far along the bridge is, though. But yes, you’re right; Bluesky might not allow bridging if they’re able to figure out how to advertise over a federated protocol.
@karpour @ramsey @pluralistic Oh!
It's the Betamax vs VHS, Divx vs DVD thing again! The restricted profit maximizer vs the peoples' format
@ramsey @pluralistic The profit motive always prevails 😬
@ramsey @pluralistic what do you mean by "run major portions of the protocol"? Control the protocol specification?
@lukasb @pluralistic This post and the one right after it explain what I mean. https://phpc.social/@ramsey/110848783925619565
Boo Ramsey 👻🎃💀 (@[email protected])

@[email protected] Admittedly, I’m doing some reading-between-the-lines, but IMO, it’s implied: “The federation architecture allows anyone to host a BGS, though it’s a fairly resource-demanding service. In all likelihood, there may be a few large full-network providers, and then a long tail of partial-network providers. Small bespoke BGSs could also service tightly or well-defined slices of the network, like a specific new application or a small community.” https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/5-5-2023-federation-architecture

PHP Community on Mastodon

@ramsey @pluralistic ah! Sorry I missed that.

Must admit I'm pretty taken with the marketplace of algorithms idea ... but I see what you mean about the BGSes.

@lukasb @pluralistic I definitely think they have some good ideas in terms of the protocol and tech, but they have lots of people/culture problems they think can be solved by the tech, which IMO, won’t work out for them.
@lukasb @ramsey @pluralistic "Marketplace of..." is never not bullshit.

@jwcph @ramsey @pluralistic maybe. But there's a lot of potential in new timeline algorithms, I think - I'm excited about the idea of just letting devs try out new ideas here.

Basically I'm wondering if we can surface good stuff without the "optimizing for car crashes" aspect of current social media algorithms.

@lukasb @ramsey @pluralistic I don't agree. There will be no possible way for us, the users, to have any kind of transparency into how any given algo works. Even in the best case scenario - say, one where you can fine-tune the algo to your preferences somehow - you still have no idea in hell how it achieves the feed you're looking at.

For all you can possibly know, any algo you choose may be laden with all sorts of icky or dangerous biases & there's no way for you to know.

@jwcph @ramsey @pluralistic I don't understand. Why couldn't developers open-source their algorithms? (Yes, it's more complicated if there's machine learning involved, but it's also possible there.)
@lukasb @ramsey @pluralistic Open-sourcing algos won't help in the slightest. Even experts won't be able to agree how an algo actually works in the wild just by reading the code - and everyone else will be utterly without a single chance of getting any kind of clarity or understanding from anywhere.
@jwcph @lukasb @pluralistic Algorithms are code routines. You can tell what an algorithm does by reading the code. You’re giving the machines too much credit; none of them make decisions independently of the code and data given to them.
@ramsey @lukasb @pluralistic - and you might be giving me too little credit; I obviously know that. I also know, however, that code is a messy business, and that anything involving many parts all interacting with each other can be difficult - or impossible - to untangle & map out clearly (here meaning: In a way a non-expert can understand, which also accurately predicts the system's behavior).

@ramsey @pluralistic

@raccoon called this several months ago, hat's off to him.

@ramsey @pluralistic

Good work, Ben, thank you. I was wondering about Bluesky, even started the process of opening account, then few months ago my cat whiskers felt something untoward, and I got off the idea. Nothing concrete, just a hunch. Your post confirms it.

@ramsey @pluralistic Nobody knows what it's like.
To be the bad man.
To be the sad man.
Behind Bluesky
@ramsey @pluralistic "Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss!"
@ramsey @pluralistic we got to that point after looking at two things: jack dorsey being involved, and the rest of the team being laden with cryptocurrency wanks. imagine taking several months to figure out that Jack "i do three things: fascism sympathy, machine learning maximalism, and bitcoin maximalism" Dorsey is not on the up-and-up.

@ramsey @pluralistic I'm honestly waiting for half the features to get paywalled.

"Want your post to be seen? $2"

"Want your reply at the top? $5"

"Want to ensure your celebrity crush sees your post? $150"