I genuinely believe that the fact that Webkit is the only engine Apple will allow on iOS is the only thing preventing a complete Chromium monoculture on the web right now.
User choice isn't worth shit if web devs don't support any browser except Chrome, and if 95% of people are using it then that's all they will support.
And to be clear, I'm not under any illusion that Apple's reasons for doing this are in any way noble. They're doing it because they don't want to be under Google's bootheel, and unlike most of us they are powerful enough to avoid that fate.
Is it better to be under Apple's boot than Google's? Maybe not. But I still think two boots are better than one.
@nicklockwood Yes, two boots are better.
Still, it’s a bit ironic that one is worn by the “Think different” company and the other by “Don’t be evil”.
@nicklockwood @Migueldeicaza Chromies call Safari “the new IE” because it was slow to adopt new standards and because Webkit is the only engine allowed on iOS. Many of their criticisms are fair, but what made IE a threat was that it had over 90% browser share and so Microsoft could do whatever it wanted regardless of the standards. This is what Google wants.
Oh yeah, and web developers of that era would only support IE and accuse Firefox for being non-standard.
@jackwellborn @Migueldeicaza yeah, I agree with that. Also Safari isn't lagging behind Chrome in functionality due to Apple not caring about web standards - it's because Google has so much clout that they have effectively redefined the standards to be "whatever Chrome is doing".
As for the last part - I *was* a web developer of that era, and that's not quite accurate. We all loved Firefox and wanted it to succeed, but we had to support IE above all else because that's what our customers used.
@ian @Migueldeicaza gosh, that sounds amazing! I wonder where they get their funding from?
https://uk.pcmag.com/suites/128195/mozilla-signs-lucrative-3-year-google-search-deal-for-firefox
@nicklockwood @Migueldeicaza
Same place Safari does: https://medium.com/macoclock/safari-apples-hidden-gem-893696ce3dd0
But Mozilla doesn't collect user data for advertising while Apple does: https://www.wired.com/story/apple-privacy-data-collection/
If you care about privacy and choice (I do) then Apple is not your ally.
@ian @Migueldeicaza to be clear, I think it's disgusting that Apple has started putting ads in their apps, but there's no mention of Safari in that article - I think you're conflating Apple's App Store search ad business with web-based trackers (which Safari mostly blocks).
No corporation is the ally of any individual, but Apple's business model isn't primarily based on privacy violation, so I'll take them over Google. I don't have a problem with Mozilla but they're irrelevant.
@nicklockwood @Migueldeicaza
I think you risk conflating Google's browser business with their ad business. I think Google risks that too - but Apple also risks conflating their browser and ad businesses.
Apple's business model relies on its close relationship with the Chinese government, which is presumably why they give the Chinese government to their users iCloud keys.
I tend to avoid companies that sell out their users to support genocide, usually.
@Migueldeicaza @nicklockwood there's a big difference between having development labs somewhere (as Google & other do in China) and giving access to your users' data. I'm uncomfortable with all of these companies' engagement with countries that don't respect human rights. I've been involved in protest against my employer building data centers in Israel and Saudi Arabia.
But Apple's approach to their users data in China is afaik unique among Western companies.
@ian @Migueldeicaza @nicklockwood Apple’s approach in China isn’t totally unique among the western companies allowed to operate there.
Western companies in China have to partner with a Chinese company that owns the servers and has root access to them. So you either let a Chinese company with CCP representation on their board own the servers. Or you don’t operate there.
@nicklockwood The duopoly of Apple and Google is the biggest threat to the open and free web. Their interests diverge often but on DRM and remote attestation they are exactly aligned.
As technologists we have outsized power and we can make Firefox be relevant again. What are we going to do to make that a reality?