This would be a welcome move! #Vivaldi does this with its #VivaldiSocial interface, built into the browser. Options like this greatly improve ease of use for new #Mastodon arrivals.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if Apple launched an instance also. @icloud.social?
@GaryRLundberg @micahflee @mozilla
#apple #MastodonRequest #TimCook
<ahem> +1
😮
Yes, and maybe the owner of Tesla could start a Mastodon clone as well, right?
Isn't the Fediverse supposed to be an alternative for surveillance capitalism?
I’m not sure. Aren’t news organizations and governments allowed, already active? Businesses also?
I feel open source compliance, no algorithms to force feed toots, and no advertising inserted into feeds are the key.
There are already paid hosting services for personal and business instances. Is that not commercializing the #fediverse?
Right now I think the more fully compliant instances there are makes a better Federation.
Brands need to be where the people are. You’re right, the brand’s employees are all essentially working for and promoting their products.
I just think as Web 3.0 takes the federate approach mainstream, brands will be there. The key is to keep the power, and data, securely with the people. And their instance.
I also think many internet hosting/URL companies will soon be offering personal instances. As demand for @joinmastodon grows.
You're kind of missing the point a little bit
They certainly used to. Don’t know it’s still live or not. Will have to check.
Yes. I agree. Seems to make the most sense that businesses set-up instances for employees. Engage in the #fediverse at the person to person level.
Another scenario: Someday soon many people will have a personal Mastodon account hosted by a provider. Like getting personal email from GoDaddy or similar. I think this is more likely than companies creating public instances.
@micahflee @mozilla Keep in mind that not all instance owners are amateurs, and be wary of the movement of heavyweights, even if they're historically Good Actors.
Also, do not forget the scripture:
12:10 And the beast shall come forth surrounded by a roiling cloud of vengeance. The house of the unbelievers shall be razed and they shall be scorched to the earth. Their tags shall blink until the end of days.
So, is this good news, or is this the partner of Meta that's coming to check if there's money to be made?
Isn't the strength of mastodon the absence of big players?
@PatrickFromFW @micahflee @mozilla
I would hope so, but look around, check the reactions here. I see most people cheering. Some of them say Apple should start an instance too. My reaction:
"Sure! And maybe the owner of Tesla could start a Mastodon clone as well, right?"
Mastodon might be well designed, but the capitalist mindset is deeply embedded in people. We need more than technical solutions, we need a decolonisation process of sorts.
@micahflee @mozilla That is a great thing! Love that more and more communities will spring up on here.
What I can say by now:
1. Mastodon is way friendlier, less toxic
2. Mastodon offers a wide variety of servers to pick from, so great if I want to have a nice local community
3. I get way more activity on my toots here compared to the birdsite even though there are less people here. sure it's from the same people, but it's way more welcoming than on Twitter.
@bgrinter @micahflee @mozilla I think if they start following that strategy then other instances will simply block them. They'll isolate themselves into their own bubble.
but daaaamn you now gave me flashbacks from the start of my career as a web dev working on cross browser compatibility. I didn't have it thaaaaat bad but I did have to support ie 6 :'(
@infernal_barry @micahflee @mozilla yeah, hopefully lots of people have caught on to the bad old ways.
I remember the “works best on IE6”…
Same reason I still use Safari - don’t want to repeat the mistakes of the past with one dominant browser
Actually safari has become the new ie6 for us. Not nearly as bad but they don't seem to follow the set standards as closely as the other browsers. Although nowadays there are so many tools that help with this sort of thing and browser companies are a really trying to work together somewhat in terms of implementing the same standards
Wow the works best on ie6 was so damn sneaky!!!!
@infernal_barry @micahflee @mozilla
It's been so long I got the wording wrong - "Best Viewed with..."
@micahflee @mozilla it'll be a Federated instance but not necessarily (probably not) Mastodon. It's important to maintain that distinction
But yes, accessibility to a Federated instance for the average web denizen will be a huge things
@olavf @micahflee @mozilla sounds like they explicitly chose mastodon to start with, what makes you think otherwise?
"While we’re starting this exploration on Mastodon — as a mature, stable project, it’s an ideal first step into the Fediverse <...>"
@ro @ro <...> we believe the potential of the Fediverse is bigger and broader than Mastodon alone.
Anyway that just likely means they're going to fork the Mastodon code base, at which point it's no longer Mastodon. This is common practice for open-source.
FWIW counter/social and truth/social are also Mastodon forks, they're just not Federated.
@olavf i doubt mozilla would maintain a mastodon fork. there's no reason to add more fragmentation to an already not-so-healthy network. if they make some useful changes, why not upstream them?
that said, modern day mozilla does make a lot of weird decisions, so we'll see
@ro the only fragmentation is there a handful of protocols and some software stacks generally don't support the other protocols. But, if you combine all the other protocols together, ActivityPub has more users by over an order of magnitude.
Different s/w stacks that can talk to each other is a feature, not a bug. In fact, it's the entire point. Forking to add features outside the Mastodon base is one way to do that while maintaining most of the core code