@Deglassco @kaydubatl I wish I could like this a thousand times.
This is also a future conference panel waiting to happen.
Why does it have to be the harassed that have to seek a haven? This is a new WORLDWIDE space. Wouldn't it be a much better space if those that want to harass or be harassed are the ones that have to go find somewhere else to do it than on servers where everyone else manages to get along?
Most people have a negative response to being disrepected and bullied. Bullies do that to anyone they can get to - for size, race, handicaps, interests or just "because". Bullying behaviour by any user should not be tolerated by any confederated server. It brings no good.
I would think(hope!) that something like that would be in the Fediverse Charter.
Some things only trigger a few - snakes or swearing. Those few of us that don't want to see that stuff can block the user. I hope that Mastodon admins have a system where the more a user gets muted and/or blocked, the closer a look they take at that user.
Bullying is a whole other thing and should be reported, then blocked/muted. I would hope that the admins here agree that bullying is out. Let the bullies go back to Birdville or Trump Social.
I got an in-your-face porn picture in my federated feed the other day. Innocent server - very not innocent picture. I would definitely like it if I could block that server that allow porn, to be honest.
I guess I am asking what is bad enough for enough people that it should be on separate servers. i would say it should be something (bad?) people DO on here, not what people ARE. If you do post porn, do harass/bully, do post fake news - those are my suggestions.
I agree. It will be interesting to see where the line goes between letting individual users block/mute and where there will be a call for separate servers, so that users don't have to block each eg. porn poster individually.
On FB, admins can put users on suspension, giving them a chance to straighten out - and then they can block them from their group/page. Something similar should be doable here.
@Deglassco Instead of "maybe you're not a good fit" (I've even been told "if you don't like {bad behavior X}, then maybe the internet isn't right for you"), I'd like to instead say:
If anyone is penalized on other instances for punching up and hurting the delicate feelings of the powerful, you're welcome on my instance.
@Deglassco
Right. #whitePeople like me need to be #antiRacist (even if imperfectly). Technology ain't the full solution. We're still the majority of the electorate (and this space) and we still have a lot of sway.
Lemme go on a bit. I'm an ignoramus when it comes to what's right in the details, so I choose to #trustBipocPeople. I believe y'all are more interested in justice than not (at least, until we get to some bright future when justice is universal, but that's a long way off).
@Deglassco "places like #Mastodon can’t incorporate #diversity & #inclusion." I am sorry but 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐨𝐧 is not one place! There's plenty of servers (instances) catering to many preferences. If an instance is becoming hostile to a group and moderators are not cooperating, then just jump ship to a welcoming instance. Mastodon allows people to block people and servers.
In the past when a server embraced discrimination and harassment they were blocked by most other instances.
@OuchieTimes @sproid @Deglassco the default option should be open, with the option to ban if they feel the content of a server doesn't fit.
defaulting to ban just means any new server is automatically blocked. essentially punished just for existing, then having to prove their worth.
how could an admin possibly keep up? and how would they be federated anyway? autoblock means there would be no possibility to connect. would every admin have to apply to the admin of every instance?
@Deglassco
Ok, this is triggering. I cannot emphasize the systemic forces weaponizing language & social convention endured daily by POCs. "Not a good fit," "not professional," & similar coded language have great cost to those targeted.
Yes, diversified contributions in these spaces is essential for meaningful discourse.
@Deglassco As a white male on a bumpy & never-ending journey to be an increasingly #AntiRacist #Ally I appreciate your willingness to bear witness. You shouldn't need to do that and certainly should not redline yourself in the Fediverse.
I hope that you find more privileged voices who listen, learn, affirm, amplify & ACT than those who strive for power via denigration.
And more importantly, #SpeakUpWhitePeople
And...
I keep hearing this - that Mastodon doesn't incorporate diversity and inclusion.
But the whole point of decentralization is to *avoid centralized control*. Every instance can do its own thing. Every community can have its own home.
The counter is always "but the instances could soft-block the marginalized communities!"
And... theoretically, sure. No one can point to an example of it happening, but it could. How's that compare to every single centralized platform in tech history?
@Deglassco Oh, wait, I can think of exactly one instance where the entire community as a whole has broadly speaking come together to push a marginalized community out of the Fediverse.
That would be the alt-right nazis.
And we're the ones who're havens for alt-right libertarians out to oppress the marginalized communities?
You can always defederate and instance block us. Of course to do that you'd need to be able to make your own instances and run them the way you want... oh. Wait.
@Deglassco @notafurry My takeaway at this point has been that yes, it’s a different model which means you use and interact with it differently. Yes, there’s a learning curve.
I think that it will be up to individuals and groups to determine for themselves whether the pros outweigh the cons.
—-
Pros: You *can* block known servers that are racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, transphobic.
Con: the same users can make accounts elsewhere and become problems, even for a small community, like sock accounts but it’s harder to block the same person when they hide across multiple servers every time they’re blocked.
—
Pro: You can have a small safe community.
Con: That means you can end up becoming insulated and reinforcing harmful behaviors like micro aggressions because you don’t necessarily have a larger platform calling out the behavior.
—
Pro: You can organize within your community more effectively using hashtags or creating focused instances.
Con: you don’t get the breadth of viability that a centralized platform and algorithm lead to that makes organizing online effective
—
Pro: you can focus on socializing with people who share a common interest with you-no matter what that is
Con: Individuals have to be more purposeful diversifying their experience and seeking out people who bring a different lives experience.
—
I don’t have a better/worse for myself yet. I want to keep observing more and making my experience one that works for me. However I am also someone who *does* look for people who aren’t like me anyway so it’s not a new experience for me to *do* that. For some, it would be.
I like Mastodon. I like the decentralized nature. I’m neither averse to it nor completely committed to it. I just think it comes with a different set of pros/cons and the value judgment will be different for each person.
@GeekmomK @Deglassco I don't disagree with that, other than to say that none of those points are new to those of us who've been here a while; some of them we've experienced and grappled with and developed workable solutions for them (and some of those solutions are now broken with the influx of new users.)
That things must be re-evaluated is obvious. That things will change. New people and communities arriving from Twitter must be a part of those conversations.