Whoa whoa whoa...

Whoa.

You mean to tell me that #Mastodon has *zero* algorithms deciding what I should read, and that the vast majority of instances banish Nazis into their own shadowrealm instead of tolerating them in the name of EnGaGeMenT?

Hah! Next you'll tell me there are no advertisers wielding influence over feature design so they get more marketing eyeballs!

Wait, what??!

@chartier But if they don't build a model to help fund the expense of running servers, this will all got the way of IRC, Email, Newsgroups etc. Users must be the customer in order to prevent becoming the product.
@zaskoda @chartier What if professional organizations ran servers and paid for them via providing verification? A rel=me link in your profile page at your professional society's website would be meaningful verification from the perspective of the person reading posts.
@williamgunn @chartier In that specific context, the problem of paying for the server is resolved - assuming that organization has the budget for it. While that model works great for lots of things, it's not a solution to the greater problem. Consider that email is federated and any company can run their own mail server but we still live in a world where most people get their email from one of a few large providers who abuse their data.
@zaskoda @chartier People mostly want something that works reliably, based on my observations over a decade or two and experience communicating product changes at Quora.

@williamgunn @zaskoda It's the early days for some, but others have been here for years. The system is built around a collection of ideally small nodes that are all relatively cheap to run. People flock to some of the larger, established instances, which usually start taking monthly contributions to cover admin costs.

Management companies are already here to reduce friction for non-technical users. It works. It's the original internet in action again.

@chartier @zaskoda I would expect to find that what works at one scale will be different from what works at a different scale. The sufficiency of donations is likely one of those things.
@williamgunn @chartier @zaskoda How is Wikipedia paid for? I imagine that's similar to how this will go for some larger instances.

@zaskoda @williamgunn @chartier

The problem with email is that it's hard to change the service after-the-fact if you didn't think to separate the service from the address from the begin. This isn't the case here.

@zaskoda @chartier OpenCollective.com, built-in transparency & crowdfunding, it's possible!
@zaskoda @chartier yeah, it’s really a shame how no one uses email anymore 😉
@gerwitz @chartier okay, let's gets into that. Email is federated. Yet, most people use one of a few big providers who exploit user data to target ads. If you're not paying for the product, you will become the product. Running your own email server is prohibitively challenging, in part because of spam. And spam happens because sending email is free. Charge one tenth of a penny for an email and it would drastically reduce spam. But you want it all to be free.

@zaskoda @gerwitz Gotta disagree on the 'running your own server' point.

Running your own *physical* server, in your own garage? Sure, maybe. But I think it's easy to say most people wouldn't want to do that anyway. They'd go to a service provider like any of the zillions of web hosts and even dedicated email services we have, and those are all dirt cheap. No ads, pro-privacy, etc.

(Contd)

@zaskoda @gerwitz Do most people want fedi/masto to be free? I think that's a tough call. The network is designed to prefer lots of small instances (over 1,100 now), which are relatively cheap to run.

Many of them start up Patreons to cover the costs. If they get large enough, it grows to cover mods. It seems to be working quite well so far. I don't see any imminent threat of advertising or other insidious funding mechanisms.

@chartier @gerwitz having to resort to Patreon demonstrates the problem. If Mastodon takes off, someone will become a big service provider and consolidate users, just like email. Then they will exploit that user base. Sure there will be alternatives, but it'll be such an inferior experience that few people will even consider them, just like email.

@zaskoda @gerwitz So then the rest of the network can choose to defederate those large, abusive instances. They already do it with Gab and even Mastodon.social and .online for various reasons (many related to poor moderation or deliberate federation with abusive instances).

It's been working well so far. Communities organizing themselves and deciding who they want to hang out with. Just like people IRL. I think it's great.

@zaskoda @chartier I frankly expect an email-like future if Mastodon grows to threaten the ad companies, where e.g. Meta wakes up and makes an easy to understand instance.

The race is on to establish a resilient enough network that this future looks like Gmail’s, where a *lot* of people are happy (or ignorantly) captive but to remain viable is nonetheless compelled to participate in open protocols.

Or to stop before it becomes a threat to the attention monetizers.

@gerwitz @chartier it sounds like you're okay with the paradigm of Gmail users being exploited for their data??? Personally, I consider this to be a threat to society in general. So we're probably coming from completely different places.
@zaskoda @chartier oh, don’t confuse “expect” with “okay with”! I would like to burn the whole neoliberal system of feudalism to the ground.
@gerwitz @chartier I can see that distinction. Maybe in some future thread I'll do better at explaining why I think solving that will require having people pay for their use. But right now I just feel bad for setting chartier off.
@zaskoda @gerwitz Now that's just a dishonest reading of my position dude. I'm out. Muting this.
@chartier @gerwitz we've been down this path. People don't use federated IRC, they use Slack or Teams. People don't use federated news groups, they use Facebook. What Mastodon has done is well excited, but not new. And there's nothing here to prevent the same fate from befalling Mastodon. If you're not the customer, you become the product.

@zaskoda @gerwitz Dude at this point it feels like you're just ignoring everything they've been doing different, the potential that *is* here, and the years of growth and experience down these paths that have already happened in Fedi.

If you're stuck on doom and gloom, well that's certainly a take. But I'm here because I believe in it and I'm trying to help in a few places where I can. This is the part of the conversation where I hop off.

@chartier @gerwitz I agree, the potential is there. But there's a key problem left unsolved. The place I'm coming from is better explained by Jaron Lanier. His book "who owns the future" digs deep into the issues in clearly failing to communicate. Even if you're frustrated with me, I still think you'll be glad you read it. Take care.
@zaskoda @chartier @gerwitz Any book describing the future is a complete fictional hypothesis. Why would anyone talk about it as though it were gospel truth?
@Phil_C @chartier @gerwitz not sure where you're getting this gospel thing from. My recommendation for the book still stands. You're welcome to ignore it.
@zaskoda @chartier @gerwitz I'm merely saying it's a hypothesised work of fiction. I wonder if anyone wrote a book about how Twitter was bought by a weird billionaire using Saudi money only for it to tank as a result.
Probably not, because the future is rarely as we predict it.
It could be a well written book but it's all navel gazing fiction, in which case why wouldn't read some proper science fiction instead.
@chartier @gerwitz I feel like you've never actually attempted to run your own mail server. Do it, show me. Move your email to a server you maintain yourself. If it's so easy breezy, it should be no big deal for you, yeah? We can talk later about everything that's going to go terribly wrong.
@chartier @gerwitz here's a slightly better overview of the challenge than I would be able to write up myself: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/why-you-may-not-want-to-run-your-own-mail-server
Why You May Not Want To Run Your Own Mail Server | DigitalOcean

When setting up a web site or application under your own domain, it is likely that you will also want a mail server to handle the domain’s incoming and outgo…

@zaskoda @gerwitz Maybe we're talking different levels of running your own server, of which there are many?

I run a couple addresses through my web host. But there are also many dedicated services like Fastmail, where it's basically 'managed' for you and they fight spam quite well.

Like, there's a broad spectrum when it comes to DIY email, and the ecosystem for Masto and Fedi is growing the same way. Has for years.

@zaskoda @gerwitz And, again, while the option is there, I don't think it's controversial to claim that the majority of people won't want to go that route. They'll want something managed, like Fastmail, and plenty of options are springing up.

Digital Ocean. Masto.host, Fedi.Monster, NextCloud, etc. I've heard some traditional web hosts are spinning up one-click options like WordPress and many other apps.

@chartier @zaskoda @gerwitz In a case where you might ever have to deal with, say, the internals of Postgres, the vast, vast majority of people do not want to touch it. Ever. If that's the cost of using this social network, nearly everybody just won't.

The admins I see here do, in fact, have to touch Postgres. It's one reason there aren't more of them, even as the giant Twitter influx happens.

@chartier @zaskoda @gerwitz I'm not saying "Postgres is bad." It's by far the best DB we have. But touching *any* database is too much admin work, and leaves us vulnerable to centralised solutions (unless we have some other way around that.)

Same problem as running an email server, which requires a similar level of ongoing drudgery plus specialised expertise. It's hard to get lots of people doing that for you, at scale.

"We'll just require a lot more good-quality free DevOps" is hard to scale.

@codefolio @chartier @zaskoda I like this point about sacking sysadmin. The role of mastohost may be under appreciated in supporting recent growth, and a healthy fediverse would have many such services.
@zaskoda FWIW I have written SMTP and POP3 services from scratch before. But pivoted to a career in design so you don’t have to convince me most people won’t want to understand, much less host, instances.
@chartier Jeez, how will you know what to do or interact with then??!
@chartier well the second part could still happen. Though don't know if they're willing to deal with the pull request nature. Or they could fork the main repo.
@chartier there is one algorithm ruling this platform - the Chaos Monkey 🐒🐵
But what am I going to do without my pRomOTeD poSts?

@chartier We're now in the end game, full circle XD

No algorithms, no ads, no crap, just, good.

@chartier and folk can look at the code to see what it actually does. Crazy
@chartier finally a social network brave enough to admit that Nazis = Bad!
@chartier please do not let this be a fever dream. I love this!
@chartier Weird, huh? Almost retro. Kind of like how Twitter was 12 years ago only it works better and users aren't trying to figure out what to do with it.

@chartier This is the ✨ FUTURE! ✨

But it is also the past, in a way. 🙂

Really crazy how much Mastodon & Fediverse remind me of the early days of the internet, or even the time when we still connected to mailboxes via modem. 💜

@chartier until there will be enough critical mass. Then it will become too tempting to be ignored.
@chartier Advertising will need to become a feature as it grows and they need to earn money

@chartier

Yes. It would also seem that this place is missing a lot of 'influencers' holding empty game boxes.

@chartier read the source code.

@chartier I mean... Gargron does seem to be trying to make the software more and more like Twitter and otherwise obnoxious.

But overall, yeah!

@frostwolf Huh, this is a new one on me. In what way(s)?

@chartier 4.0 has some annoying shit. The entire mobile UI got completely changed around purely for the sake of change, and it's super annoying now; he's adding /algorithms to search/ (boosts your ranking if you have more followers, what the fuck); logged-out click-on-a-post view needs Javascript now; and I'm sure there's something else I'm forgetting.

Post editing is nice though, at least.

@chartier
Absolutely brilliant, isn't it!
@chartier wonderful isn't it <3 do consider supporting your server if you are able to - many have Patreons or similar