In his brilliant dissertation, “Property and the Power to Say No,” Karl Widerquist cites an exchange that occurred between Union soldiers and a group of newly emancipated people in Savannah, Georgia. When asked what they needed to secure their freedom:
“The group chose at its spokesman Garrison Frazier, a Baptist minister who had purchased the liberty of his wife and himself in 1856. Asked what he understood by slavery, Frazier responded that it meant one person's ‘receiving by irresistible power the work of another man, and not by his consent.’ Freedom he defined as ‘placing us where we could reap the fruit of our own labor, and take care of ourselves;’ the best way to accomplish this was ‘to have land, and turn it and till it by our own labor.’”
There’s a remarkably clear and clear-eyed understanding of freedom and unfreedom from people who had undeniable first-hand knowledge of slavery.
Many people, when they hear the phrase “wage slavery,” take offense to the idea of comparing the horrors of chattel slavery to the quite often banal insults of wage labor. But the thing that defines slavery isn’t “bad working conditions;” it’s the absence of the power to say “no.”
And both Douglas and Frazier were quite clear: wage laborers are as unfree as they were as slaves.
2/6
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:a73bad11-7004-43f2-a02d-5ed151078476
#WageLabor #WageSlavery