> For everyone calling Meta (Ray-Ban) AI Smart Glasses “revolutionary”...
> And for everyone considering buying a pair...
>
> Think twice.
>
> Meta Platforms doesn’t sell glasses. It builds data pipelines.
For everyone calling Meta (Ray-Ban) AI Smart Glasses “revolutionary”... And for everyone considering buying a pair... Think twice. Meta itself states: “in some cases, Meta will review your interactions with AIs, including the content of your conversations with or messages to AIs, and this review can be automated or manual (human).” Let that sink in. To “train” the AI, real people are reviewing your footage. The see what you see, what you say, where you are. Not hypothetically. In practice. Reports suggest workers are exposed to highly personal moments: “We see everything, from living rooms to naked bodies.” This isn’t just smart tech. It’s a level of access into your private life most people wouldn’t knowingly agree to. Meta Platforms doesn’t sell glasses. It builds data pipelines. So ask yourself: Are you buying a smart product... Or volunteering your life as training data? Source: Investigations by Svenska Dagbladet and Göteborgs-Posten, also covered by the BBC. Links are in the comments for those who are interested in the articles
RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@brucelawson/116243807011110029
Re: Pokémon Go training data.
Well there were very strong hints in the terms of service even early on, and a large part of why I stopped playing the game after the first month or two… Wish I still had the links that convinced me.
I hate that basically everything I started to “wear a tin foil hat” about over the past 10 years has since been proven to be abused by corporations... “You are the product” etc etc.
Si la IA generativa es solo una «herramienta», ¿para qué necesitan las tecnológicas a profesionales que la entrenen con emociones humanas? Al registro masivo de datos biométricos y a la emulación de emociones le falta un buen acopio de muestras de ADN para completar su objetivo de suplantación ¿verdad?
Where did you think the training data was coming from?
When the news broke that Meta's #smartGlasses were feeding data directly into their #Facebook servers, I wondered what all the fuss was about. Who thought #AI glasses used to secretly record people would be private? Then again, I've grown cynical over the years.
#privacy #TrainingData #meta
https://idiallo.com/blog/where-did-the-training-data-come-from-meta-ai-rayban-glasses
Why would you want to hide the #trainingdata ?
(but to be fair, which company has been transparent about that?)
Michael Geike (@MichaelGeike)
Anthropic이 중국 AI 연구팀들을 상대로 Claude 출력물을 대규모로 수집해 경쟁 모델 학습에 사용했다며 혐의를 제기한 내용. 대상에는 deepseek_ai, Moonshot AI, MiniMax가 언급되며 수만 개의 가짜 계정·수백만 건의 상호작용이 사용됐다는 주장으로 데이터 수집·학습 윤리와 법적 문제를 제기함.
🚨 AI Showdown: Anthropic vs. Chinese AI Labs @AnthropicAI claims @deepseek_ai, Moonshot AI & MiniMax copied Claude by harvesting outputs at scale. The allegation? Tens of thousands of fake accounts. Millions of interactions. Used to train rival models. At the center:
Ansh Nanda (@anshnanda)
작성자는 Claude Code가 @theo의 YouTube 콘텐츠로 학습된 것처럼 느껴진다고 언급하며, 특히 AWS나 GCP 등 전통적인 클라우드 제공업체를 전혀 추천하지 않은 점이 가장 놀랍다고 평가함. 전반적으로 Claude Code의 추천 성향(클라우드 미추천)이 @theo 콘텐츠 영향으로 해석되는 관찰임.
Unofficial PetaPixel Bot
Paul Melis
Nathaniel Daught
Nia Soler
PrivacyDigest
Taran Rampersad
sayzard
Richard R Lee