#statstab #518 Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to
Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing

Thoughts: An appropriate paper for today.

#pvalues #teaching #history #pedagogy #nhst #fisher

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00031305.2018.1537891

#statstab #517 Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research

Thoughts: Do your findings generalise? What does that mean?

#design #causalinference #theory #generalisability

https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/isre.14.3.221.16560

#statstab #516 Is there a boxplot variant for Poisson distributed data?

Thoughts: People like their canned visualisations, but you need to think what question you are answering.

#poisson #boxplot #sqrttransform #dataviz #r #outliers #distribution

https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/13086/is-there-a-boxplot-variant-for-poisson-distributed-data

Is there a boxplot variant for Poisson distributed data?

I'd like to know if there is a boxplot variant adapted to Poisson distributed data (or possibly other distributions)? With a Gaussian distribution, whiskers placed at L = Q1 - 1.5 IQR and U = Q3 +...

Cross Validated

#statstab #515 Confounded dose-response effects of treatment adherence: fitting Bayesian instrumental variable models using brms

Thoughts: A nice tutorial on how to think about confounding, Simulating data, and making inferences

#brms #bayes #IV #guide

https://rpsychologist.com/adherence-analysis-IV-brms

Confounded dose-response effects of treatment adherence: fitting Bayesian instrumental variable models using brms

Something that never ceases to amaze (depress) me, is how extremely common it is to see causal claims in RCTs, that are not part of the randomization. For…

#statstab #514 A puzzle of proportions

Thoughts: "Two popular Bayesian tests can yield dramatically different conclusions"
Model specification is important.

#bayesian #bayes #bayesfactor #nulleffects #proportions

https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9278

#statstab #513 Some thoughts on checking the R session

Thoughts: Maybe we stop using rm(list=ls())? Setting up a good environment isn't always intuitive.

#rstats #r #coding #reproducibility #guide

https://blog.djnavarro.net/posts/2026-01-06_sessioncheck/

Some thoughts on checking the R session – Notes from a data witch

More precisely, some thoughts on an R package I might send to CRAN, and I’d appreciate comments and criticism

Notes from a data witch

#statstab #512 Standardised mean difference estimators {shinyapp}

Thoughts: Calculating the correct SMD can be challenging, and most software are quite bad at it. Use this shiny app instead!

#cohend #SMD #hedgesg #heterogeneity #effectsize

https://effectsize.shinyapps.io/deffsize/

#statstab #511 Seven Myths of Randomisation
in Clinical Trials

Thoughts: Randomization is a very powerful tool for inference. Closest we have to magic in research. But it's also misunderstood.

#randomization #experiment #inference #design #bias #science

https://www.methodologyhubs.mrc.ac.uk/files/9214/3711/9501/Plenary-_Stephen_Senn.pdf

#statstab #510 A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check

Thoughts: Another paper to consider when "removing participants who failed our manipulation check"πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

#manipulationcheck #estimand #experiment #design #bias #guide #assumptions #missingdata

https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.5

A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check | Political Analysis | Cambridge Core

A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check - Volume 27 Issue 4

Cambridge Core

#statstab #509 Effective sample size

Thoughts: ESS often reported for bayesian models, but is it really understood?

#brms #rstats #r #bayesian #ess #diagnostics

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/11/27/effective-sample-size/