#statstab #499 SIMPLICITY AND COMPLEXITY IN ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS

Thoughts: I dislike this paper, but I don't mind sharing views that disagree with my own. Effective communication matters.

#analysis #critique #critical #ANOVA #ttest #simplicity #communication

https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[56:SACIED]2.0.CO;2

#statstab #485 Bayesian ANCOVA and the ATE

Thoughts: Still grappling with the implications of using the causal inference approach to randomized experiments. But it's interesting.

#ATE #causalinference #ancova #ANOVA #rstats #estimand #counterfactuals

https://solomonkurz.netlify.app/blog/2025-07-20-within-person-factorial-experiments-log-normal-reaction-time-data/

#statstab #481 Getting over ANOVA: Estimation graphics for multi-group comparisons

Thoughts: Complex designs are harder to visualise, but with Estimation Statistics you get some perks over simple bar charts.

#design #estimationstatistics #ANOVA

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.26.701654v1

Possibly the worst #crime perpetuated by a #mathematics and #computerscience university degree is teaching that #statistics is boring.

Studying #psychology taught me that #factoranalysis and #ANOVA are super neat.

Today, I've been looking at and implemented rank-biased overlap (and distance) and #PERMANOVA (permutational ANOVA) to compare groups' (partial) rankings of preferences. The computer scientist in me is horrified, no longer at the statistics, but at the computational complexity.

Due to a recent discussion with colleagues on whether and when to use #LinearMixedModels (#LMM), I wrote a blog post comparing LMM to other approaches using simulated data. I thought, it may also be useful for others working with hierarchical data structures in #neuroscience and beyond.

๐ŸŒ https://www.fabriziomusacchio.com/blog/2026-01-31-linear_mixed_models/

#Python #Statistics #DataScience #MixedModels #Statsmodels #ANOVA #ANCOVA #GLMM #regression

In another network, senior author Adam Claridge-Chang publicly added this insightful and pungent commentary:

"Here's a dirty secret about ANOVA: it tests a null hypothesis that nobody cares about. When you run a one-way ANOVA, you're testing whether "all group means are equal." But even if you reject this hypothesis, you learn nothing about which groups differ, in which direction, or by how much. So you embark on a second analytical step: multiple two-group comparisons. A modest six-group experiment suddenly requires testing 15 hypotheses. To manage this multiplicity, you apply corrections like Bonferroni, which undermine your statistical power. What you posed as a focused research question has sprawled into a complex web of subsidiary tests, forced by the ANOVA ritual."

"Our new preprint, "Getting over ANOVA: Estimation graphics for multi-group comparisons," makes the case for a better approach. Estimation statistics encourages you to compare each test group to a single control, focusing on the effect sizes that actually matter. A six-group experiment focuses attention on just five effect sizes with confidence intervals, showing magnitude and precision directly."

"The preprint introduces estimation methods for a range of multi-group designs: repeated-measures experiments, 2ร—2 factorial designs, binary outcome data, and mini-meta analysis for internal replicates. Each can replace data-analysis practices used in thousands of studies every year."

#ANOVA #statistics

"Getting over ANOVA: Estimation graphics for multi-group comparisons", Lu et al. 2026 (Claridge-Chang's lab)
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.26.701654v1

"Data analysis in experimental science mainly relies on null-hypothesis significance testing, despite its well-known limitations. A powerful alternative is estimation statistics, which focuses on effect-size quantification. However, current estimation tools struggle with the complex, multi-group comparisons common in biological research. Here we introduce DABEST 2.0, an estimation framework for complex experimental designs, including shared-control, repeated-measures, two-way factorial experiments, and meta-analysis of replicates."

Grateful to Adam Claridge-Chang for leading and pushing on this. There's institutional-wide need for change in the biological sciences when it comes to statistical handling of data. And quite the memorable acronym, #DABEST ...

#statistics #biology #ANOVA #DABEST

#statstab #462 Factorial Plots

Thoughts: Not the most modern of plots, but nice to have a guide on what to show based on your design.

#plots #dataviz #ANOVA #interaction

https://www.processma.com/resource/factorial_plots.php

Factorial Plots | ProcessMA

Factorial Plots can be used to help you visualise how the response relates to one or more factors.

#statstab #461 Interpreting Ordinal and Disordinal interactions

Thoughts: Interactions are not simple things. Their shape can determine many things (including sample size and effect size)

#design #ANOVA #interaction #effectsize #ordinal #crossover

https://www.jolley-mitchell.com/Appendix/WebAppOrdinalInteraction/WebAppOrdinalInteractions.htm

RDE Ordinal Interactions

#statstab #460 {permuco} permutation tests in linear models with nuisances variables

Thoughts: Supports ANOVA, ANCOVA, t-tests and more.

#permutation #randomization #ANOVA #rstats #r #pvalues #ancova #ttest

https://jaromilfrossard.github.io/permuco/index.html

Permutation Tests for Regression, (Repeated Measures) ANOVA/ANCOVA and Comparison of Signals

Functions to compute p-values based on permutation tests. Regression, ANOVA and ANCOVA, omnibus F-tests, marginal unilateral and bilateral t-tests are available. Several methods to handle nuisance variables are implemented (Kherad-Pajouh, S., & Renaud, O. (2010) <doi:10.1016/j.csda.2010.02.015> ; Kherad-Pajouh, S., & Renaud, O. (2014) <doi:10.1007/s00362-014-0617-3> ; Winkler, A. M., Ridgway, G. R., Webster, M. A., Smith, S. M., & Nichols, T. E. (2014) <doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060>). An extension for the comparison of signals issued from experimental conditions (e.g. EEG/ERP signals) is provided. Several corrections for multiple testing are possible, including the cluster-mass statistic (Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) <doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024>) and the threshold-free cluster enhancement (Smith, S. M., & Nichols, T. E. (2009) <doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061>).