*If* what the "AI" [1] grifters say in their sales pitches were true [2], and their LLMs are good at writing prose, summarizing other text, and writing code, then it follows that you should be able to do this:

"<LLM-agent>, write an LLM prompt text that will cause a code-generating LLM to create a Gmail clone, including server-side code and client-side user interface."

Then feed that to CopyLot or whatever, and out pops a Gmail clone.

[1] Bovine excretory corollary to Sturgeon's Law: if an article about "AI" doesn't use scare quotes on (at minimum) the first use of the term, it is guaranteed grifter salesbabble, not actual human thought. If scare quotes *are* properly used, then it's only 90% likely to be grifter #salesbabble.

[2] It isn't.

#grifter #AI #LLM #grift #BS #bullshit #ScareQuotes #corollary #SturgeonsLaw #agent #AgenticAI #agentic

Time to be a bit silly. Yes, it is time for #TisTimeForTorturePrincess.

I don’t think there’s any way around it at this late stage of social media development, but it IS kind of a pity that #hashtags can’t include #scareQuotes such as “Tis time for “Torture”, Princess”

I also have to share this because there was "Propane" in scare quotes on a sign and I HAD TO.

#propaneAndPropaneAccessories #HankHill #scareQuotes

Well, that seems a little passive-aggressive PowerShell, damn.

#PowerShell #Success #AirQuotes #ScareQuotes #Scripting

I am so tired of search engines "deciding" I don't care about the terms I've searched for even when using the advanced syntaxes, quotes, +, -, site:, inurl:, etc.

Why ignore my input?
Why do they all produce the same results?

Anyone have a "good" search engine recommendation?

#search #SearchEngine #ScareQuotes #frustration

I miss Altavista and its plain-old boolean operators for search. I can even craft/tune a search that returns pages I "know" are out there.