Let's say, hypothetically, you were suing a large multinational company and they were twice willing to settle with you, but they insisted on a nondisclosure agreement (#NDA), under which you would not be allowed to speak about the settlement to anyone. Both times they included that language, you asked, what is the value of the NDA to the company, and how will you compensate me for agreeing to it? And both tines they refused to answer and insisted you sign away your ability to confer with other consumers without any additional compensation whatsoever. Now that settlement talks have ended, and the case is going to arbitration, his do you argue for additional compensation for the NDA or simply not including the NDA. Asking for a friend, of course.
