40% des gains de productivité de l'#IA sont perdus en correction d'erreurs https://mstdn.fr/@Grrr/116476012646291703 #correction
[via Ponos] https://ponos-job.eu/thread/chxfhp3s1aahori0jhnnwf9ys
40% des gains de productivité de l'IA sont engloutis par la correction d'erreurs https://www.cio-online.com/actualites/lire-40-des-gains-de-productivite-de-l-ia-sont-engloutis-par-la-correction-d-erreurs-16984.html
Claims on Exercise for Long COVID Were “Overly Assertive,” Agree Meta-Analysis Authors
By David Tuller, DrPH *This is a crowdfunding month at UC Berkeley. If you’d like to support my work, the link is here. I posted two days ago that a Lancet journal, eClinicalMedicine, had just published a letter of mine, as well as an unsatisfactory corrigendum to the study I had criticized. That study, “Effects of therapeutic interventions on long COVID: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” from Tan et al, reported “high-certainty evidence” in favor of exercise interventions, and suggested they “should be prioritized.” My letter challenged that perspective. The corrigendum related to just one concern I had raised, and I found it unsatisfactory. As it turned out, the record wasn’t complete. I had assumed the corrigendum was, in effect, the response to my letter. But at some point since then, the journal posted a direct response to my letter from the meta-analysis authors, in which they thanked me for my observations, among other remarks. Here is one passage from their response that jumps out: “We must acknowledge that certain expressions used in our writing, such as “high-certainty evidence” and “should be prioritized,” may have come across as overly assertive and could potentially lead to misinterpretation by readers. It would indeed have been more appropriate to phrase these as “evidence of moderate certainty” or “may be considered a preferred option.” We deeply appreciate your valuable feedback regarding these less precise formulations. Your comments contribute significantly to the rigor of academic discourse.” I’m glad the authors agree that they should have toned down their language, although their substitute phrasings are still too positive, in my view. What I find especially perplexing is that they had an opportunity to fix these conclusions with the corrigendum—and they didn’t. As it stands, the article continues to assert that there is “high-certainty evidence” for exercise …God does not seek to harm us…
Christians often say that praying for patience will bring trials to test us, but I now see that's a lie...https://thedignityofman.net/2026/04/26/god-does-not-seek-to-harm-us/
UPDATE: The image is from Israel and not England, the original poster on BlueSky deleted the post after I mentioned the origin of the image.
Thanks to @2legged here is the link to Cnn article about it:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/23/middleeast/police-detain-jewish-man-kippah-israel-palestinian-flag-intl
(NOT)England today:A Jew was arrested because of his Kippah
That’s what the police did before giving it back to her.
This is just insane.
#UK #Antisemitsm #isra el #Palestine #Fascism #Israel #Correction #CNN