Statement from the Founder – 6 June 2026

I am increasingly concerned by what appears to be a growing lack of transparency and accountability from major technology platforms when restricting access to users’ accounts.

After finally regaining access to my LinkedIn account following a lengthy verification process, my account was once again restricted. The only explanation provided by LinkedIn Trust and Consumer Support Consultant, Ramesh S, was:

“Your account has violated the LinkedIn User Agreement and Professional Community Policies. Due to the number and/or the severity of these violations, your account will remain restricted.”

No details were provided regarding which policies were allegedly violated, what content or actions gave rise to the decision, when the alleged violations occurred, or how I might challenge or understand the basis for the restriction.

As someone who has consistently used LinkedIn over the years for professional networking, advocacy, and discussion of workplace abuse, racial inequality, retaliation, and broader concerns about surveillance and repression, I find the absence of any meaningful explanation deeply troubling. What differentiates my LinkedIn activity from many users on the platform, and who decides that?

At a minimum, due process and basic fairness require that individuals understand the allegations being made against them. Vague assertions of policy violations without evidence, context, or specificity create the impression of arbitrary enforcement and make it impossible for users to defend themselves.

I cannot currently determine whether this restriction is the result of error, automated decision-making, malicious reporting, or something more concerning. However, when viewed alongside other recent disruptions affecting my communications and online presence, it raises serious questions that deserve answers.

If technology platforms are to play such a central role in public and professional life, they must be transparent, accountable, and willing to explain decisions that can significantly affect a person’s reputation, livelihood, and ability to communicate.

I continue to seek clarity regarding LinkedIn’s decision and remain committed to speaking out about political persecution, workplace retaliation, and the importance of protecting civil liberties in both physical and digital spaces.

Your support and vigilance concerning these matters are appreciated.

— Nikki Adebiyi
Founder, Bounce Black

#activism #ai #bullying #coordinatedHarassment #covertRetaliation #education #employmentLaw #essentialServices #freeSpeech #harassment #humanRightsCrisis #humanRights #life #LinkedIn #mentalHealth #mobile #network #news #O2 #officialStatement #oppression #organisedHarassment #persecution #politicalPersecution #politics #repression #retaliation #socialMedia #statement #surveillanceState #systemicOppression #technology #UK #UnitedNations #Vodafone #workplaceAbuse #workplaceBullying #workplaceRetaliation

Workplace retaliation in Los Angeles tech firms can be subtle but legally significant.

Employees who report issues may face exclusion, demotion, or sudden scrutiny. California law provides strong protections, but success depends on documentation and timing.

#EmploymentLaw #WorkplaceRetaliation #LosAngeles #TechIndustry

Retaliation doesn’t always mean being fired.
It can be subtle—schedule cuts, write-ups, or exclusion after raising concerns.

California healthcare workers are protected by powerful laws. Know them.

#WorkplaceRetaliation #EmploymentLaw #HealthcareWorkers #California #EmployeeRights

Retaliation is one of the most common employment law violations. Sudden demotions, schedule changes, or increased scrutiny after an HR complaint could signal illegal conduct. Know your rights and act quickly. #EmploymentLaw #WorkplaceRetaliation #CaliforniaLaw #WorkersRights

Retaliation does not have to be dramatic to be illegal.

Healthcare workers in Pico-Robertson may experience subtle changes like reduced shifts, exclusion, or increased scrutiny after speaking up.

These patterns matter under California law.

#WorkplaceRetaliation #CaliforniaLaw #EmployeeRights #HealthcareWorkers #LegalHelp

Workers at Amazon, UPS, and similar workplaces have strong protections after reporting discrimination or safety concerns. Retaliation can include termination, reduced hours, or hostile treatment. California law provides remedies including back pay and reinstatement. #EmploymentLaw #WorkplaceRetaliation #California #WorkerRights

Even executives at major firms can face wrongful termination or retaliation. California law offers strong protections, but documentation and timing are critical.

#WrongfulTermination #EmploymentLaw #ExecutiveRights #CaliforniaLaw #WorkplaceRetaliation #Whistleblower

Retaliation in influencer marketing and digital media workplaces often appears as exclusion, reduced hours, or sudden criticism rather than termination. California employees are protected under FEHA, Labor Code 1102.5, FMLA, and ADA.

#WorkplaceRetaliation #EmployeeRights #CaliforniaLaw #FairfaxDistrict #EmploymentLaw #FEHA #Whistleblower #FMLA

If you reported unsafe working conditions in Pomona and your employer retaliated, you may have a legal claim under California law.

Retaliation can include termination, demotion, reduced hours, or hostile treatment.

Learn your rights and act within strict deadlines.

#EmploymentLaw #WorkplaceRetaliation #Pomona #WorkerRights #CaliforniaLaw #Whistleblower #LaborLaw

Employees in Culver City media companies, including Sony Pictures, may still pursue retaliation claims under California law even if they are unionized.

FEHA provides powerful protections when you report discrimination or harassment. Documentation is key.

#WorkplaceRetaliation #SonyPictures #CulverCity #EmploymentLaw #FEHA #CaliforniaLaw #EmployeeRights