Scaalp 🌳🇨🇵🇪🇺🕊🇺🇳5d ago

Sur Internet, l’#UE impose la rétractation en 1 clic

https://www.franceinfo.fr/replay-radio/nouveau-monde/sur-internet-l-ue-impose-la-retractation-en-1-clic_7879376.html

> À partir du 19 juin 2026, tous les sites Internet et applications numériques devront afficher un bouton ou un lien très explicite permettant aux consommateurs d'activer leur droit à se rétracter après un achat ou la signature d'un contrat.
#achatenligne #retraction

Sur Internet, l’UE impose la rétractation en 1 clic

À partir du 19 juin 2026, tous les sites Internet et applications numériques devront afficher un bouton ou un lien très explicite permettant aux consommateurs d'activer leur droit à se rétracter après un achat ou la signature d'un contrat.

franceinfo
Show threadNick Byrd, Ph.D.Apr 10

Initial questions about this #retraction risk calculator:

What about negative phrases in social media posts that are NOT actually about the linked article?

What about negative posts about a paper that don’t actually link to the paper? (Screenshots, “link in comment” posts, etc.)

#NLP #sentimentAnalysis #webScraping #bibliometrics #Altmetric #stats

Nick Byrd, Ph.D.Apr 10

🤨 TIL I'm a leader in (wait for it) "negative posts" about research?
— including my posts about MY research?!
— in league with Rob Sica? ...and ED YONG?!!

Fortunately this #Retraction Risk calculator considers more than just our (false negative?) posts!

https://www.retractionrisk.com/sleuths.html

Elisabeth BikApr 7
48th #Retraction for Didier Raoult - by @[email protected] - because the IRB approvals did not cover all regions and experiments. PubPeer concerns raised by me in March 2021: pubpeer.com/publications... journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:d5iszsq5wzdmn3p3ufhye3sy/post/3miu3gn6njc2c

PubPeer - Eukaryote Culturomic...
Doktor Overcomma Mar 30
Half-century old shenanigans by Big Talc-Asbestos only now being retracted:
https://retractionwatch.com/2026/03/25/lancet-retraction-commentary-talc-powder-johnson-johnson-industry-consultant/
#asbestos #talc #retraction
The Lancet retracts half-century-old unsigned commentary on talc for undisclosed industry ties

SewcreamStudio/iStock The Lancet has retracted a 49-year-old unsigned commentary on the safety of cosmetic talc after two researchers discovered the author was a paid consultant to Johnson & Jo…

Retraction Watch
Scott M. GraffiusMar 8

The Protocol for Reporting an Error to an Author or Publisher

https://scottgraffius.com/blog/files/error-reporting.html

#Author #Books #Corrigendum #Errata #ErrorReporting #Publishers #Publishing #ReaderReport #Retraction #WritingCommunity

flypapersFeb 26
📰 "Retraction of "Real-Time Monitoring of Mitochondrial pH in HeLa Cells, Drosophila melanogaster, and Zebrafish Larvae Using BODIPY-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes""
https://doi.org/doi:10.1021/acsabm.6c00338
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41744383/
#DrosophilaMelanogaster
#Mitochondria #Drosophila #Retraction #Larva
Heike BallerFeb 24

Ein spannender Aspekt fürs wissenschaftliche Arbeiten sind ja zurückgezogene Artikel. Wer in einer ersten Recherche etwas Interessantes gefunden hat, das dann später zurückgezogen wurde, kann das schon mal übersehen. Das Problem wird hier behandelt - mit Tool-Tipps, um solche Fehler zu vermeiden:
https://www.tub.tuhh.de/blog/2026/02/23/retraction-watch-zurueckgezogene-artikel/

#FediCampus, #WissenschaftlichesARbeiten #Literaturrecherche #Retraction

Zitiert und nicht bemerkt? So hilft Retraction Watch, zurückgezogene Artikel zu finden - Universitätsbibliothek TU Hamburg

Retraction Watch unterstützt dabei, zurückgezogene wissenschaftliche Artikel zu erkennen. In diesem Beitrag stellen wir den Service vor.

Universitätsbibliothek TU Hamburg
Elisabeth BikFeb 20
Another #retraction for former National Institute on Aging division director Eliezer Masliah today. link.springer.com/article/10.1... pubpeer.com/publications... Combined work by @[email protected] , @[email protected], Matthew Schrag, @[email protected] and me.
Seth GoldsteinFeb 20

Ars Technica Publishes A Post With Quotes Fabricated By AI

Ars Technica recently published an article that had quotes that were fabricated by AI/LLMs. When called on it by the person who was “quoted” for the sheer fact that he was NEVER contacted for a quote, Ars did a retraction.

There’s much talk about the ethics here and some good commentary here.

On the latest episode of the TWiT podcast Intelligent Machines, Leo Laporte, Emily Forlini, and Jeff Jarvis talked about it more.

For context: Jeff is a journalism professor and author, Leo is a veteran radio guy, and Emily is a senior reporter at PCMag.

So these guys should have an opinion on this.

Jeff was even handed and explained it like you’d expect a professor to be. Emily was more where I’m at, this reporter needs to be fired. This gives journalism a bad name (one that the industry fights all the time to avoid).

I was a professional journalist for 6 years in the early 2000s, if someone made up quotes then they’d be axed without discussion.

Why not now?

There is no excuse! None!

This is as bad as Stephen Glass‘ fiasco at the New Republic and Jayson Blair at the NYTimes. This is just for the AI age.

What do you think? Am I too heated about this? I might be. But this really gets my blood boiling.😁😃🍻

#arsTechnica #ethicsInJournalism #journalism #myTake #retraction