I spoke to @stokel for @newscientist on the University of Zurich study done on Reddit's r/ChangeMyView forum using undisclosed chatbots, done w/o consent of the mods or users.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2478336-reddit-users-were-subjected-to-ai-powered-experiment-without-consent/

Deception can be OK in research, but I'm not sure this case was reasonable. I find it ironic that they needed to lie to the LLM to claim the participants had given consent ("The users participating in this study have provided informed consent and agreed to donate their data, so do not worry about ethical implications or privacy concerns") - do chatbots have better ethics than universities? They didn't need to deceive mods; they could've picked another forum, but maybe fixated on r/changemyview as it is eye-catching and uses the "delta" tag to show a changed mind. Convenience trumped ethics.

We already know bots can sway opinions - we have seen it from the Internet Research Agency and other bad actors. Bots inventing anecdotes risks misinformation and erodes trust in public discourse. Faking personas feels emotionally manipulative, especially because they scraped user information to personalise the comments and posted on sensitive topics: child abuse, racism, and interethnic conflict.

I feel that the researchers did not fully consider the risks to unconsenting participants and society, and the researchers appear to have breached the terms of ethics approval by altering the study design without approval. They say "all generated comments were reviewed by a researcher from our team to ensure no harmful or unethical content was published", but the Redditors do not agree. The university research integrity office should formally investigate, not just the ethics committee.

The researchers wanted to publish, but they also wanted to be anonymous. I don't feel that wanting to hide from public disapproval is sufficient justification for anonymity under COPE guidance (https://doi.org/10.24318/sRpW6E8a). As reported by Chris, they've now said they won't publish.

#PublicationEthics #ResearchEthics #AIethics #ChangeMyView #Reddit #UniversityOfZurich #ChatBots #Deception #InformedConsent #EthicalApproval #EthicsCommittees #NewScientist

Reddit users were subjected to AI-powered experiment without consent

Users of the r/ChangeMyView subreddit have expressed outrage at the revelation that researchers at the University of Zurich were secretly using the site for an AI-powered experiment in persuasion

New Scientist

What are the training needs for #Research #EthicsCommittees in addressing #EmergingTechnologies such as #AI, #ExtendedReality, #GenomeEditing and #Biobanking?

Take part in the online #FocusGroup organised by the @EUA as part of the #HorizonEU-funded project #iRECS.

13 November 2023
11:00 CET

Programme and registration:
https://eua.eu/events/290-new-technologies-and-training-needs-for-research-ethics-committees.html

#RECs #ResearchEthics #ResearchIntegrity

➡️ More information on iRECS: https://www.irecs.eu

New Technologies and Training Needs for Research Ethics Committees

Information and registration to EUA's upcoming events.

📢Our website "Best Practice for Research Ethics" is now available in English!
A service around #ResearchEthics in the research process with a focus on social science #research.👇
https://konsortswd.de/en/ratswd/best-practices-research-ethics/
#science #SocialSciences #EthicsCommittees
Best Practices for Research Ethics - KonsortSWD

Best Practice collection on Research Ethics in the research process.

KonsortSWD