"The neo-Luddism or doomerism in some left circles today risks missing the procedurally generated forest for the trees. Thinking through changes to the economy and work brought about by automation, we ought to ask ourselves a series of questions while we prepare to pass judgment: Who controls and benefits from these changes and could the public put such technologies to good use? Are these developments aimed at supporting or enhancing our individual and shared humanity, or do they diminish it? Do we need this or that change? And above all, can we responsibly plan for and control these developments in a way that maintains social, political, and cultural standards, expectations, and needs?
With technological development, the details matter. The Left should not be reflexively anti-technology, but rather skeptical of how technologies are developed, deployed, and controlled — and for whose benefit. An automated society in which states and worker-owned enterprises harness the marvels and wonders of technology to serve public ends while meeting individual needs is entirely consistent with the good life. Indeed, carefully constructed, this society could be far closer to utopia than dystopia — and far better than the world we inhabit today.
But getting there requires structural changes in how we organize the economy, which requires the hard work of organizing, mobilizing, setting political priorities, reforming institutions, and winning political power. That work, machines will never be able to do. That work is, and will remain, ours."
https://jacobin.com/2026/05/robots-ai-automation-workers-planning
#Robots #Automation #Robotics #AI #EconomicDemocracy #Capitalism














