Furthermore, if you just decide not to take payment for your work, in #nonquant #econ, you can just call that investment.
That's actually what you're doing when you volunteer anyway, isn't it?
With #nonquant, I'm not talking about everyone quitting your jobs and installing my software and suddenly utopia.
#nonquant is a way to look at what people are doing every day and why, and how the world works, without talking about money as though it's more than what it is: overhead.
So there is one big plus side of #nonquant #econ. Work that is invisible to classical economics (domestic work, for starters) becomes first class economic activity.
Next, I can say that in a nonquantified economy, potentiation of value can be recognized as investment.
Boom. Education, infrastructure, and preventive health — WHOLE SECTORS crudely shoehorned into the quantified economy — get promoted to their rightful top priority.

We present a new solution concept called evolutionarily stable Stackelberg equilibrium (SESS). We study the Stackelberg evolutionary game setting in which there is a single leading player and a symmetric population of followers. The leader selects an optimal mixed strategy, anticipating that the follower population plays an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) in the induced subgame and may satisfy additional ecological conditions. We consider both leader-optimal and follower-optimal selection among ESSs, which arise as special cases of our framework. Prior approaches to Stackelberg evolutionary games either define the follower response via evolutionary dynamics or assume rational best-response behavior, without explicitly enforcing stability against invasion by mutations. We present algorithms for computing SESS in discrete and continuous games, and validate the latter empirically. Our model applies naturally to biological settings; for example, in cancer treatment the leader represents the physician and the followers correspond to competing cancer cell phenotypes.