Why Mounties paid 5 informers to spy on Dene leaders: Inside a secret surveillance operation
Dene leaders believe the RCMP Security Service in the 1970s broke into their office in Yellowknife, bugged it, stole and leaked material while aiming to discredit them via Operation Checkmate, a national disruption program.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/dene-nation-rcmp-security-service-files-9.7139036?cmp=rss
Why Mounties paid 5 informers to spy on Dene leaders: Inside a secret surveillance operation
Dene leaders believe the RCMP Security Service in the 1970s broke into their office in Yellowknife, bugged it, stole and leaked material while aiming to discredit them via Operation Checkmate, a national disruption program.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/dene-nation-rcmp-security-service-files-9.7139036?cmp=rss

@briannosek.bsky.social

A word of caution on my end. It relates to something I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_v1

There is a striking resemble to things recommended and backed by Big #Tabacco vs #Science some decades ago.
Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

Here a quick summary:
"Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
(1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
(2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
(3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
Shockingly, in 1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

OSF

@UlrikeHahn
We as researchers are just super naive. If you ask me, those things go back to Big #Tabacco vs #Science
Ironically, they demanded what we in #OpenScience demand nowadays, but with a very different aim... :(

I touch upon that in a recent #preprint on open data: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hk786_v1

"Long before today’s #Open #Science movements, the Executive Committee of the Sound Science Coalition (1994; cited in Ong & Glantz, 2001) published guidelines that align with what Open Science practices advocate today. For example:
(1) The study design should inform about all hypotheses,
(2) after the study was conducted, the data should be analyzed as described in the study design, and
(3) if the data does not support the hypotheses, no further analyses are necessary.
Shockingly, in #1994 these recommendations were motivated by the fact that parts of the #tobacco industry aimed to #discredit research and researchers on a large scale, with the goal that it could not be legally established that smoking increases the risk of lung #cancer (Drope, 2001; Muggli et al., 2001; Ong & Glantz, 2001). Along this line, one may accuse researchers as having been naive to the vested interests aligning with scientific rigour by non-researchers."

Qui est Progressif #Media, cette société liée à #Vivendi qui cherche à nuire à #Reporters Sans Frontières ? - L'Humanité

https://www.humanite.fr/medias/cnews/qui-est-progressif-media-cette-societe-liee-a-vivendi-qui-cherche-a-nuire-a-reporters-sans-frontieres

> Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF) accuse l’agence de #communication, Progressif Media, de mener une « vaste campagne de #discrédit » à son égard. Dans une enquête, l’ONG de...

#Progressif #Medias #ProgressifMedia #Progressif_Media

Qui est Progressif Media, cette société liée à Vivendi qui cherche à nuire à Reporters Sans Frontières ?

Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF) accuse l’agence de communication, Progressif Media, de mener une « vaste campagne de discrédit » à son égard. Dans une enquête, l’ONG de...

L'Humanité
Ein älterer, aber relevanter Artikel zeigt, wie diese Kommunikationsmuster schon lange zur Strategie gehören – auch gegenüber Veteranen.
Lesenswert zur Einordnung:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1057181
#Trump #Discredit #NarrativeControl #Veterans #USPolitics #Spin
Deny, divert, discredit: Trump turns to his scandal playbook once again

President Donald Trump is turning to what's become a tried-and-true pattern of defending himself against scandal in the latest controversy over a whistleblower's accusation that he made a disturbing promise to a foreign leader.

NBC News

Das Verhalten der #Trump Administration in der #Signal Affäre wirkt wie eine #Fallstudie zur Trump-Krisenkommunikation: deny, divert, discredit. Erst wird abgestritten, dann abgelenkt, schließlich diskreditiert. In der schnelldrehenden Kommunikation dieser Administration laufen die Taktiken oft gleichzeitig. Die aktuellen Angriffe auf #TheAtlantic sind Teil einer klaren #Discredit #strategie.

#USA #Politik #Medienstrategie #Krisenkommunikation #Propaganda #Kommunikation #desinformation

🔥The US government-funded a ‘private social network’ which posts personal attacks on pesticide critics 🔥

In 2017, two United Nations experts called for a treaty to strictly #regulate #dangerous #pesticides, which they said were a “global human rights concern”, citing scientific research showing pesticides can cause cancers, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s and other health problems.

Publicly, the pesticide industry’s lead trade association dubbed the recommendations “unfounded and sensational assertions”.
👉 In private, industry advocates have gone further.👈

⚠️Derogatory profiles of the two UN experts, Hilal Elver and Baskut Tuncak, are hosted on an online private portal for pesticide company employees and a range of influential allies.

Members can access a wide range of #personal #information about hundreds of individuals from around the world deemed a threat to industry interests,
including the US food writers Michael #Pollan and Mark #Bittman, the Indian environmentalist Vandana #Shiva and the Nigerian activist Nnimmo #Bassey.

🆘 Many profiles include #personal #details such as the names of family members, phone numbers, home addresses and even house values.

The profiling is part of an effort – that was
💥financed, in part, by #US #taxpayer #dollars
– to #downplay pesticide dangers, #discredit opponents and #undermine international policymaking, according to court records, emails and other documents obtained by the non-profit newsroom Lighthouse Reports
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/26/government-funded-social-network-attacking-pesticide-critics?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Revealed: the US government-funded ‘private social network’ attacking pesticide critics

Network includes derogatory profiles of figures such as UN experts and food writer Michael Pollan, and is part of an effort to downplay pesticide dangers, records suggest

The Guardian
George Santos won’t seek reelection following ethics report

Republican Congressman George Santos of New York says he won't run for reelection in 2024 after a scathing House Ethics Committee report on his conduct cited “overwhelming evidence” of lawbreaking. The Ethics panel says it has referred its findings about Santos to the Justice Department. Shortly after the panel’s report was released, Santos blasted it in a tweet on X as a “disgusting politicized smear” but said he would not be seeking reelection to a second term. A renewed effort to expel him has been launched. The committee said Thursday that Santos’ conduct warrants public condemnation, is beneath the dignity of the office, and has brought severe discredit upon the House.

AP News

We can’t fight the Republican party’s ‘big lie’ with facts alone

🔺Why do seemingly serious people repeat crazy political lies? 🔺

This was the question the American anthropologist and political scientist Lisa Wedeen explored when she studied the Syrian dictatorship in the 1990s.

She was struck by how people who were usually rational in private would repeat the utterly absurd slogans of the regime, such as claiming that the dictator Hafez al-Assad was the greatest chemist in the world.

“From the moment you leave your house, you ask: what does the regime want?,” a Syrian explained to her. “The struggle becomes who can praise the government more.” The bigger the lie you uttered, the more loyal you were.

🔥“The regime’s power resides in its ability to impose national fictions and to make people say and do what they otherwise would not,” Wedeen concluded. “🔥

👉This obedience makes people complicit; it entangles them in self-enforcing relations of domination, thereby making it hard for participants to see themselves simply as victims of the state’s caprices.”

👉💔I was reminded of Wedeen’s research when the US Congress finally selected a #speaker after weeks of chaos.

Their choice, Congressman #Mike #Johnson of Louisiana, is best known for ardently supporting ex-president Donald Trump’s baseless claims that the 2020 election, which Trump lost to Jo Biden, was rigged.

Johnson was the head of the committee to question the integrity of the election. He constructed spurious legal arguments that tried to #discredit the vote, though his proposals were thrown out by the US supreme court. He raised the unfounded theory that the voting machines used in the election were #tampered with.

This claim is so groundless that Fox, the network that supported the allegation, had to pay nearly a billion dollars in a settlement with Dominion, the company that makes the machines.

Many of the Republican representatives who supported Johnson’s candidacy have admitted both publicly and privately that the elections were, in fact, not falsified.

Yet when journalists faced a gaggle of Republican congressmen and questioned Johnson’s record on this blatant lie, his colleagues jeered and he mockingly said: “Next question” – as if the facts were irrelevant here.

🔸Along with Wedeen’s Syrian example, I’m reminded of the Czech dissident and playwright Václav Havel’s essay The Power of the Powerless, where he tells the story of a greengrocer in communist-era Prague who puts up pro-regime posters in his shop window.
The greengrocer doesn’t believe the communist slogans; the people who make the slogans don’t believe in them; and the people who read them don’t believe in them.
👉But as long as everyone plays along, the system continues. It’s the act of not believing and yet pretending, rather than of fervently believing, which is the power of such systems.
♦️Your will is corroded: you are made into moral mincemeat that can be shaped any which way by the leader.♦️

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/commentisfree/2023/oct/29/you-cant-fight-the-republican-partys-big-lie-with-facts-alone?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

We can’t fight the Republican party’s ‘big lie’ with facts alone

Agreeing to Donald Trump’s claims about the ‘rigged’ 2020 election ensures your fealty by making you complicit

The Guardian