ubi

@ubi@ecoevo.social
512 Followers
474 Following
23.4K Posts
@irfan I wouldn't call it heavenly. But it's good for vegetarian chicken.

What so many people in the world don’t understand is that artists aren’t simply “chasing dreams.” More — so much more — than that, they are being themselves, investing, discovering, learning, creating, changing, growing, breaking, reinventing, building, sharing, teaching, and inspiring.

Never disparage artists. Without them, troubled hearts, anxious souls, and knotted minds would know little refuge, and nominal growth.
#ArtsAppreciation #RespectArtists #FineArts #PerformingArts #arts #artists

Hossam Shabat’s team: “An Imminent Humanitarian Catastrophe Threatens the Lives of Hundreds of Patients and Wounded in Gaza

The lives of hundreds of Palestinian patients and wounded individuals at Nasser Medical Complex are facing an imminent threat due to the complete depletion of diesel fuel required to operate the electric generators, which the hospital relies on entirely amid the ongoing power outage. Israel occupation siege is killing thousands of patients.

In this context, Dr. Mohammad Saqr, Director of Nursing at the complex, stated: “The generators will cease functioning within the next 24 hours,”
warning that this would effectively constitute “a death sentence for dozens of premature infants, wounded individuals in intensive care units, and patients who rely on oxygen to stay alive.””

#Gaza

LLMs simulate confidence more than they do intelligence.

Today I learned about 'rabbit starvation' and how Neanderthals avoided it.

When you're a hunter-gatherer and it's winter, you may try to survive by eating only meat - like rabbits, but also deer and other game. But this gives you too much protein and not enough carbohydrates and fat: most of this meat is very lean. If you eat enough lean meat to get all the calories you need, you can die from an overdose of protein! It's called 'protein toxicity'.

Hunter-gatherers in this situation sometimes throw away the 'steaks' and 'roasts' - the thighs and shoulders of the animals they kill - or feed them to their dogs. They need FAT to survive! So they focus on eating the fatty parts, including bone marrow.

So, in some cultures, while the men are out hunting, the women spend time making bone grease. This takes a lot of work. They take bones and break them into small pieces with a stone hammer. They boil them for several hours. The fat floats to the top. Then they let the water cool and skim off the fat.

There's been evidence for people doing this as far back as 28,000 BC. But now some scientists have found a Neanderthal 'bone grease factory' that's 125,000 years old!

This was during the last interglacial, in Germany. In a site near a lake, called Neumark-Nord, Neanderthals killed a lot of bison, horses and deer and crushed their bones, leaving behind tens of thousands of small bone fragments.

• Lutz Kindler et al, Large-scale processing of within-bone nutrients by Neanderthals, 125,000 years ago, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adv1257

Thanks to @sarahtaber for spotting this!

Fediverse is still the most lively social network I have ever used, since MySpace in 2003. It is better than Twitter or any commercial social media platform ever was. Absolutely love being here.

The most profound thing about it is the international coverage. After the first wave of enshittification in 2010, algorithms took over, and suddenly as a polyglot I was labeled as Finnish. No more visible international posts, people only saw the Finnish ones.

I've noticed the same effect in commercial AI. It ignores the fact that I use English online 99% of the time and still replies to me in Finnish despite all instructions. Algorithms and AI label you. They assign you a language, a status, a certain type of person. There's no changing that.

The Fediverse and Mastodon are delightfully mine, yours, and truly open source - respecting privacy. Nobody's machine can tell you, "You are this, and this is why we do that."

Fuck labelers and the fog machines. Let me be me. Here, on my own server, I can embrace my weirdness and post however I want, how often I want, whenever I want, in whatever language I choose - without constantly worrying about how my identity will be perceived by a machine.

#SocialMedia #Mastodon #Fediverse

How a bubbly barrier could be life-saving for plunging boobies https://phys.org/news/2025-07-barrier-life-plunging-boobies.html

"#boobies (#birds of the genus Sula) may be able to reduce the potentially lethal impact of their high-speed vertical dives by creating a cushion of #supercavitation bubbles upon impact with the water... Without this cushioning, hitting the water at 100 km/h would cause a massive impact—likely strong enough to break bones or even be fatal"

I don’t know where they come from, but they feel important. When the concept comes to me, I feel that it has to be me that paints it. 2/3
Belated #makanApaToday. Vegetarian chicken from Hainan Village. It's just tofu, but the taste and texture is convincing enough.

Boosting is really important on the Fediverse because it makes whatever you boost federate to the entire servers of all your followers. A boosted public post appears on your followers' timelines, but also becomes searchable to everyone on the servers of your followers.

Instead of an algorithm, the Fediverse relies on human beings sharing stuff they find interesting. This process creates a wonderful chain of discovery.

To boost something here, click the 🔁 or 🚀 button below the post.

#FediTips

×
Pretty sure all these #AI guys have utterly misconstrued what art is. They think it's just information/data, but it's not: it's a process; it's a manifestation of interwoven conscious & unconscious thoughts that have ripened in a human mind, sometimes for decades. And the result is an interaction with another human mind, a dialogue. 1/3
These AI guys have mistaken a photo of a meal in a restaurant menu for the meal itself. They tell themselves it looks just like the real thing, so it must be the real thing, but in the end they'll starve to death. No protein, no carbs, no vitamins, no nutrients, nothing. 2/3
Imagine there's a once-in-a-lifetime walk that takes you through the greatest, most dramatic scenery in the world. You leave from Point A and walk your way back around to Point A.
The ChatGPT guy above might as well say: "Pro tip: You can go on that great walk by never leaving Point A" 3/3

@Richard_Littler Even if they were just trying to absorb info, they can't do it like that. Having info summarized for you means you don't absorb it. That's why we spend so much time explaining, solving problems, taking notes...

They think they're inventing "general intelligence" when they don't understand how their own brain works even on a surface, basic level.

@Craigp @Richard_Littler That's because they're (excuse my French) fucking morons.

@martinl @Craigp @Richard_Littler

I wanted to say something similar, that they're too dumb to know they're dumb, but that's not quite right... Maybe they're too simply structured to know they're simply structured...

It's all about the dimensions... (as Richard explains)...

They're mistaking flat for ... (I can't think of a term for the multidimensional multisensory etc etc nature of real life...).

Maybe they just need to get out more. 😐

@Su_G > I can't think of a term for the multidimensional multisensory etc etc nature of real life...

Personally, I feel like real life has a certain (very pleasant) *fractal* quality to it, mixing the familiar with the surprising, the grandiose with the mundane, in every nook and cranny. 😀 @Craigp @Richard_Littler

@martinl @Craigp @Richard_Littler excuse my french, but : comment ce McCormick peut-il être aussi con ?
@HydrePrever @martinl @Craigp @Richard_Littler I'd like to add some context. (Poe's law, etc., I suppose.) (And a bit of Brandolini too?)
@LastEquinoxx @martinl @Craigp @Richard_Littler oh, a Schrödinger jerk! (I mean him, not you!!)
@HydrePrever @martinl @Craigp @Richard_Littler (Well, actually…) From what I saw of his profile, it may have been a joke from the start.

@Craigp @Richard_Littler

On top of which a large language model can not summarize a work, it can produce a shorter work that is statistically similar, but that is not the same thing.

@resuna @Craigp @Richard_Littler this. So much this. And only if you're lucky on top of that.
@Richard_Littler You can skip hundreds of LLM prompts by reading a single book.
@Richard_Littler To be fair, for most of the “self-improvement” books many of those AI guys are so fond of, having them summarized in two sentences is an absolutely valid approach that doesn’t lose a lot of info from those books 😂
@JensJot @Richard_Littler Two sentences? That's about 50% waffle!
@JensJot @Richard_Littler that's fair, they're written by LLMs anyway, so the bullshit is flowing infinitely
@JensJot @Richard_Littler Now THIS is a REALLY GOOD POINT. The sort of business bros who get suckered into AI hype are also all into the same sort of self-help. They generally only read that genre, so…

@JensJot @Richard_Littler

[hope someone else hasn't already said this]

Business studies books / business improvement books normally repeat everything 3times, so some sort of simple tool to de-dup is useful.
Oh.. and explain graphs in words.
and explain equations in words.

Unfortunately without semantic tagging, so normal people can not block delete the whoffle.

@JensJot @Richard_Littler Wait til they find out that most of them contradict each other.
@Richard_Littler “I took a course in speed reading, learning to read straight down the middle of the page, and was able to go through ‘War and Peace’ in 20 minutes. It’s about Russia.”
@Richard_Littler as Grandpa puts it in The Lost Boys: “Read the TV Guide, you don't need a TV.”
@Richard_Littler
They force you into the Plato cave, because its cheap for them to construct such a cave. The depth of reality costs.

@Richard_Littler I think this is what hurts me most about the whole thing. Like, an AI salesperson downplaying the value of art? Pretty clear incentives.

But the people who aren't selling AI? It's like, "there's nothing new under the sun" but instead of saying it to keep yourself humble or accept something imperfect, it's a complete cynical worldview.

The idea that all we're doing anyway is reconfiguring existing shapes and ideas—it's so bleak, and it breaks my heart.

@matt @Richard_Littler

I think there's a certain amount of sunk cost fallacy here. The AI salesperson is going to downplay the value of art, you're absolutely right. But also, anyone who's fallen for that salesperson's spiel is going to downplay the value of art, because the alternative is admitting to themselves that they screwed up.

@Richard_Littler This feels like it echoes the arguments against Reader's Digest back-in-the-day.
@mark @Richard_Littler Even Readers' Digest left you some colour and texture to enjoy.

@mark @Richard_Littler

A readers digest condensed book contained the same story and characters and events as the original. If a large language model "summary" contains some of those things it is only by accident.

@Richard_Littler Similar phenomenon with AI+code. It totally breaks the symmathesy of a codebase shared among humans.

(Symmathesy/Symmathecist: https://medium.com/@jessitron/symmathecist-n-c728957ce71f – a great concept we should use more)

Symmathecist (n) - Jessica Kerr - Medium

A symmathesy (sim-MATH-uh-see, coined by Nora Bateson) is a learning system made of learning parts. Software teams are each a symmathesy, composed of the people on the team, the running software, and…

Medium

@Richard_Littler

Yes! Great illustration of your point!
Thank you. 🙂

@Richard_Littler You don't need an LLM to do this.

If he'd actually ever picked up a book, he'd know you can read the back and turn to the last page if that's all you're doing.

@Richard_Littler They want an AI god because they have never experienced transcendence. They want summaries because they have never experienced meaning.
@Richard_Littler (Charitably though, they have probably experienced meaning and transcendence in some parts of their lives, but are likely just conditioned to treat more and more of life as transactional checklists.)
@Richard_Littler I love the analogy but have you considered: this guy is just young and/or dumb
@Richard_Littler It’s so bizzarre. You can read book summaries on Wikipedia if you want. Nobody does that though. Because, like doing the same thing but with ChatGPT, it makes no sense, you won’t learn anything by doing that.

@ninpnin @Richard_Littler

Well, I wouldn't say 'nobody'. I've lost hours of my life following a rabbit hole of storyline summaries of DC / Marvel comics so I understand the references to them in films / TV shows.

@david_chisnall @ninpnin @Richard_Littler probably saved many hours net of actually watching many of the movies and shows though. Marginal success!
@ninpnin @Richard_Littler oh I read the summaries of many books. Not sure if I read any of the books we were supposed to read in school. The summary and the lectures were enough to pass (barely) ^^

@Richard_Littler

Back in Pogo -

"I found a picture of a chicken."

"Great, if we can just find a picture of some salt."

.... It was a hit before your mother was born, though she was born a long long time ago ...

@Richard_Littler This is a great way to put it.

"read 100 books by asking chatgpt to summarize it" feels exactly like "eat 100 high end dinners by asking chat gpt to generate pictures of upscale meals" or "travel to 100 dream destinations by asking chatgpt to generate travel pictures for you"

Is it what you want? To stop enjoying the journey?

@Richard_Littler I was having a convo with @fabio about how people have been trained to not find joy in the journey of doing things, and for those people, ChatGPT is the answer. They only seek a quick result for (stuff)

@Richard_Littler @fabio It's a very empty existence. They have no joy in studying, researching, writing, making art, making music, reading - all of those things that once were a source of joy are now considered a chore and waste of time, to be replaced by a shitty robot. "Saves time", they say. Do I want that, though? I was not *wasting* time writing - I was having fun.

Can we try enjoying ourselves again?

@renatarocha As best I can tell, they think that when OTHER people read those books, or eat those meals, or travel to those places, the bragging they can do about it later *is* the point. It's all about jockeying for superiority on a social hierarchy, proving you're already valuable so you deserve more good things.

It's the same pack of people who go on about "virtue signaling," because that's all they think is happening when humans extend baseline kindness to one another.
@Richard_Littler

@renatarocha @Richard_Littler

Not that I disagree, but I'd like to note that Reader's Digest did good business last century by creating heavily abbreviated versions of famous literary works.

Also there is SOME small benefit in reading just one-or-two page summaries. We did that in university: each in the class wrote an essay on a selected work, and then shared their essays with the class. It helps contextualise the works you did read, and expand your understanding what else is available.

@Richard_Littler my problem with it is these fucks are replacing all of our meals—and those of our kids—with pictures of meals, striving to get to a working model which makes a 3D print out of glue and cornstarch, hoping we don’t notice.
@Richard_Littler
And afterwards they are still hungry. So they try again.
@Richard_Littler they’re like some strange modern sisyphus, each day they try and whisper the words of endless riches. Only by end of their daily token quota they are right back where they started.
@Richard_Littler @endolexi These are the same guys who’ve spent years subsisting on protein bars and vitamin supplements, so that analogy is pretty appropriate. When your whole world is Content, beauty and fulfilment seem alien.
@thearcanecomposer @Richard_Littler And while we're imagining 'these guys', might I add: when your whole worldview is driven by self-marketing, the notion of forming any human connections that aren't primarily transactional must seem alien as well.
@Richard_Littler “basically” has some incredible magic powers in that sentence

@Richard_Littler the unspeakable joylessness captured in this sentiment is bleak as fuck tbh

"Remember when we reduced food to Huel? What if we could do the same thing for books"

@pikesley @Richard_Littler At least Huel has nutritional value, LLM crap just has the form of something nutritious but is made up of shredded paper and poisoned water.

@pikesley @Richard_Littler I’m not trying to defend tech bros, but Soylent was always marketed with many uses, one of them being for neurodivergent people that can be food repulsed.

There isn’t just one use for it, and it’s a great solution for some things.

Fuck this AI take specifically though, absolute fool take

@maddiefuzz @pikesley @Richard_Littler I used to see ads in magazines for cassette tapes that would give you a digest of "48 business books in 90 minutes!!!", aimed at bored commuting managers. I view it as a variant of the Prosperity Gospel: learn these magic rituals and God will shower $$$ on your head.

(A means of reading fiction it ain't.)

@cstross @maddiefuzz @pikesley @Richard_Littler Bit of history I don't actually know: did they ever try putting Reader's Digest on tapes?

@pikesley @Richard_Littler

yes the lack of nuance and emotion you would get from just a summary. It misses everything that captures people about a setting or characters.

Joyless and bleak are perfect descriptors for concentrating an experience of a whole world in the pages down to a few soulless sentences.

They also don't understand what it means to "read a book" or reading for pleasure in general.

Do they just watch the last episode of a murder mystery or a summary so they know who did it? Doesn't that miss the whole point?

@Richard_Littler