Proto Himbo Derpopean

@guyjantic@infosec.exchange
595 Followers
766 Following
8.8K Posts

Antifascist. Pro-people. Love me some music. Sometimes I make it. Love photos. Sometimes I take them. Love my kid. Always & forever.

Academic who likes academia as a friend.

I'm sure my employers disagree with much of what I post.

he/him or whatever, as long as it's not insulting

Citizen of USA & Canada

Alt-text: Gimme a minute after I post before reminding me; I often post from my phone then switch to my laptop to type the text.

I sometimes obscure my employers (to protect me, not them)

Rushing aroundin these days that I know
I don't wanna get downI don't wanna stay low
But when the doom starts torattle my brain
what I'd do to have youin my arms again
what I'd do to have youin my arms again
@FritzAdalis These are examples from different assignments. haha. However, the possibility exists, because many assignments are data collection and analysis projects, with each student in a 3-6 person team assigned specific tasks. It is definitely possible for, say, the regression results table to be solid but the interpretation to be painfully bad, or for the results to be good but the discussion to seem like it's referencing a fever dream.

This semester I feel like Jekyll & Hyde:

"This is amazing. I'm really impressed with the extra work and creativity here!"

"Unfortunately, you didn't actually do most of the assignment..."

"Wow, that's an insight I've never had. Great work."

"At some point, didn't you think that having no data and no results might lead to a less-than-optimal project?"

etc.

#professor #teaching #quotidian

I manage a #sonasystems service and I am also the "brand administrator" for #qualtrics in my department. There's an issue with confidentiality; I wonder if some #research or #survey person knows a way around it:

SONA's "Qualtrics integration" instructions describe how to set things up so research participants can click the entry for a study on the SONA page and be taken to the corresponding Qualtrics survey, then--when finished with the survey--be redirected back to SONA with an anonymous record of their participation in Qualtrics.

The problem is that it's not anonymous. Not even a little. Not if you're both the SONA person and the Qualtrics person, which is probably the case in many institutions.

SONA does indeed replace the research participant's name in the URL info string with an "anonymous" ID number. That number is sent back to SONA for purposes of giving the research participant credit in SONA.

This process is only anonymous if you don't have access to both SONA and the Qualtrics survey: SONA gives a random (?) 5-digit ID number to each participant and send that to Qualtrics, which uses it to populate an embedded data field called id. Then at the end of the survey Qualtrics sends the same ID number back to SONA.

I'm looking at SONA and Qualtrics. Qualtrics gives me the "anonymous" ID number of every participant sent from SONA. SONA has the ID number paired with names in a fairly easy-to-access dashboard view for users with the roles "PI", "administrator," or (I think) "researcher".

So every student researcher doing "anonymous" survey projects can see the exact responses on surveys for each student participant, by name. It's not hard. I don't think any of my students is savvy enough to see this and pair the two values, or that they care, but this is Very Not Anonymous.

Is there some way around this where SONA-Qualtrics integration works, and is also actually anonymous, even if someone (e.g., me, the SONA administrator) has access to both the Qualtrics data and the SONA system?

[edit: Since finding this, I've been just deleting the ID data from the Qualtrics data when downloading. However, it's not an option to delete the embedded data variable until all data collection is finished ForEver, so the possibility of identifying participants who were promised anonymity remains until then; I can manage this for my students, but not for other faculty, and of course this all depends on my honesty. I do not want anything like this to depend on my honesty.]

#security #anonymity #confidentiality

@autistics

wrapping presents is satisfying.

rectangles more so than awkward shapes, but oh the folding techniques or tissue paper bagging for efficient materials use... the ribbon placements, the reinforced taping of bows, the colorful and varied methods for the ordering of chaos.

“Bark! The Herald Angels Sing” #PetsHolidaySongs #HashtagGames

RE: https://mstdn.social/@TomSullivan/115737925037249746

We have always been at war with Venezuela.

#politics

@cory We are in the precise 0.0001% of human history when this sentence makes any sense to anyone.

I'm thinking there's a fun research project here, if someone hasn't done it already: measure (this is a sticky but fun part) community enthusiasm or buy-in or financial support or something for a variety of extracurricular (or quasi-curricular activities at American high schools. My hypothesis would be that the more the activities embody direct competition, ritualized violence (or the real thing), and interpersonal domination, the greater the support will be, with men's dominance/aggression sports getting far more support than women's. Further, I suspect both of these effects will vary regionally, with parts of the US that have had high violence rates since forever (one explanation is Nisbett & Wilson's #HonorCulture hypothesis), showing the effect more strikingly.

There would be a few factors to control for, as well. I'd need to work with some people who have experience in this to know what those would be.

I would predict that, on average, the ranking of support etc. would be something like

Highest ranking: direct quasi-violent competition sports:

  • Football
  • Hockey/La Crosse
  • Basketball
  • Next: more stylized violence/domination

  • Baseball, I guess?
  • Tennis
  • Next-to-lowest: team competitions without direct confrontations

  • Track & field events with multiple people directly competing at once (e.g., 500m, etc.)
  • Swimming
  • Lowest: Individual competitions, no direct confrotation/competition

  • Track & field events like pole vault javelin, shot put, etc.
  • I'm probably missing tons of stuff, but this is an interesting #research idea

    At my kid's HS choir & orchestra concert. This school has a regionally-recognized #music program with at least half a dozen vocal and instrumental groups. They regularly send kids or groups to state competitions, have dozens of kids score extremely high on regional or state juried performances, and pull in hundreds (small town) of paid attendees to their frankly amazing middle school and high school musicals. 80% of students are in a musical group or course.

    Sports are ho hum: rarely any regional or state competitiveness, and when that happens it is more often for tennis or volleyball than for the Big Sports.

    And when you walk into the lobby and down the halls--including outside the auditorium where the concerts and rehearsals happen, there is literally zero recognition of music achievements. These spaces are dominated by the "athletic wall of fame" with glossy photos of coaches and big-sports athletes going back 50 years and life-size photo posters of the basketball team, baseball stars, etc., rotated out for fresh new professionally made posters every few months.

    You can see some of the music program's successes if you can find your way down half a dozen twisting hallways to the #choir, #band, and #orchestra rehearsal rooms.

    I think this is a slice of the USA's problems on display in thousands of schools every day. It is like pulling teeth to get a community to consistently support arts and other enrichment education for large numbers of students, but just try to pry apart a town's death grip on a tiny number of strong boys (always boys) playing ritualized violence and dominance games, often at the clear expense of academics.

    #education #musicEducation

    People use ad blockers to protect their computers from scams and malware because Google and other ad companies have failed to do so. They put profit above everything else. I can't believe this guy is on a mission to kill Firefox by the end of this year. People who use ad blockers are also less likely to buy your product if you bug them too much. I can't believe Mozilla has fallen to this level, where the CEO openly issues soft threats for a product that has little market share left.