DuckDuckGo's AI-free search saw nearly 28% more visits in the week following Google's insistence that people love AI mode. Is anyone surprised by this result?
DuckDuckGo's AI-free search saw nearly 28% more visits in the week following Google's insistence that people love AI mode. Is anyone surprised by this result?
@Mustardfacial @nixCraft thats a great question and I have no answer.
I believe the existing aosp still works, i have lineage with fdroid and there is no google in it at all.
@Mustardfacial @nixCraft the general public does not care. facebook and tiktok come preinstalled on most phones so they have little interest for apps except banks and shit. They have no idea what a browser is so they will only use the preinstalled chrome and thats it.
Companies will register with google to make their apps and they wont care either. They already do that for apple dev.
Only power users matters. And I think we're already fine. Play store will still be available through aurora.
@Mustardfacial @nixCraft TBH, I dont care if people loose access to uber et al.
And also they wont, because companies will definitely make sure that the apps stay available.
@Mustardfacial @[email protected] @nixCraft Heard of RIM? Blackberry? Does anyone care now? Nothing lasts forever.
HarmonyOS is alive and well. Alternatives exit. The world doesn't have to follow US tech and increasingly it won't.
@Mustardfacial @f4grx @nixCraft I was able to install custom ROMs and all that stuff when I was 12 - 13 years old. I just read instructions and of course expect bricking my phone and have to fix it, but yeah.
Still a headscratcher that technology has improved a ton but most people remain dumb with it. Idk.
I found over the years it's not really worth talking things like these to someone who doesn't really "get it" cos you're pretty much talking to a wall at that point, lol.
@Mustardfacial @f4grx @nixCraft the phone manufacturers used to make their own OSs, and some still maintain their own variants of Android; if Alphabet stops updating Android, the phone makers will update their own forks and/or form an association to collaborate on continuing the base OS.
(They could do so anyway, if and when they decide Google isn’t serving their interests anymore, which might be more likely than Alphabet going under)
Google will not die, at least not without a new kid on the block eating their lunch.
Being assholes will not drive users away as long as your product is better (actually or percieved as) than the competition.
So, if Google dies entirely, it will be because all of their products have been killed off by competing products.
Any product still good enough to be a contender would be bought up by someone else or (more likely) be spun off into a new company.
So, I seriously doubt that Google will die, but it may very well face the same destiny as Microsoft, who was absolutely untouchable on the desktop OS market back around the time when Windows 95 and 98 came out.
Yes, there was OS/2 and Mac OS, but they were niche players. Today, the world is completely different because of mobile devices, and none of them runs a Microsoft OS. Microsoft is now just "a" operating system provider, not "the" operating system provider.
My guess is that Google could end up in the same situation as Microsoft once the dedicated AI-companies start eating into parts of their business.
Oh, and make no mistake. LLM is here to stay.
It will not be the do-all-end-all tool that some wants it to be, but it is definitely a tool that has its uses as e.g. a dedicated knowledge management tool internally in companies.
@shaedrich @Mustardfacial @nixCraft
I didn't explain that very well. My point is, that back in the day Microsoft had a stranglehold on just about everything IT, at least for desktop use. Their Windows operating system was THE way to interact with the internet, multimedia and work.
Then came the mobile platforms, and suddenly Microsoft could no longer operate as if they owned everything. Windows was still king of the desktop, but a huge amount of users did not use a computer at all - they used tablets and phones with non-Microsoft operating systems, and they were now the majority of users.
Internet Explorer is probably the best example of what that meant for Microsoft. In the old days there was IE, and it was the browser your website had to be compatible with. It was slow and not very good, so along came Chrome and started eating Microsofts browser marketshare.
IE was still the king, but now you had to test for two browsers. Microsoft could still do things their way, at least to a point.
Then came Android and Chrome for Android, and suddenly Chrome was so far ahead that Microsoft lost the ability to operate independently. The result? - the end of IE and a surrender to the Chromium engine.
I am almost certainly that Google will face a similar downfall in the AI market.
@shaedrich @Mustardfacial @nixCraft
Right! I had actually all but forgotten about Mozilla and Firefox, but yes - there was a time when they were significant players as well.
@shaedrich @Mustardfacial @nixCraft
True - I was probably talking about Alphabet instead of Google, to be honest.
@nixCraft The thing is, I actually liked G+, it was a pretty decent platform all things considered. But oh well, I think other platforms had beaten them to punch, and you go where the people are (at that time it was FB which wasn't as awful as it is now).
But the FORCE EVERYONE TO USE IT tactic is never ever going to work because users have choices (somewhat limited) but they do have choices.
@Sablebadger @nixCraft Google disabled the search modifier "+" in advance of launching G+.
It enshittified the search syntax that used to exist in Google search.
Up to that point you could search for a specific term using +searchterm.
Also IIRC if you wanted to search for a specific phrase you could do +"specific search term as a phrase"
As well as (AFAIR) +specific +search +term +as +a +phrase.
@nixCraft grep the binaries (main and support libraries) of your fav internet browser for "google" I bet it comes up more than a few times.
This isn't good.
@lycanmatriarch @nixCraft
If you are able to, try changing your search engine to:
Or disable Javascript and you get an html version of DuckDuckGo - caveat, I do not know if the html version of the page also tries to filter out AI slop.
I just checked with Netsurf browser and on typing in https://duckduckgo.com the browser gets redirected to:
@StarkRG @nixCraft Try noai.duckduckgo.com
While I was installing a new version of LinuxMint on my remaining elderly parent's laptops recently I changed to the noai version of DuckDuckGo in all of the browsers that I installed.
My elderly parent is very thankful as it cuts out a lot of confusing elements in the standard AI enabled DuckDuckGo search page.
@StarkRG @nixCraft If you mean using the standard DuckDuckGo page with AI features turned off, this falls down if you then search in a private browsing session.
The AI features (in my experience) are all enabled in private browsing mode even if you turned them all off in a standard browsing session.
As I often search in private browsing mode this became quite tiresome after a while.
AI features stay turned off in a private browsing session when using the NoAI version of DDG.
Here
Try this
Leads to this: https://noai.duckduckgo.com/
I mean, goddamnit people, I just went to fucking --> Google <-- and searched for "NOAI DuckDuck" and got exactly that
Maybe y'all oughta try thinking and doing something new for a change
cc @nixCraft
"Its AI features are on by default; it's just they can still be disabled."
You mean to tell me that people are incapable of thinking and learning new things?
Shocking if true
Which it's not...
Here
Always use this link as your starting point: https://noai.duckduckgo.com/
cc @nixCraft
weights.bin fuckery), I run it inside a sandbox.weights.bin fuckery… A quick (DDG) search indicates Google may not have finalized the location of the file and that location may have shifted since the initial kerfuffle. Looks like you may need to wholly disable Chrome's AI extensions, instead (of just nulling the Chrome-installed file's original location). If they are still figuring out where to place it, I wonder if they're at least cleaning up the prior placements before trying to write further 4GiB files?Small search engine @marginalia reported 10x more traffic after google started force feeding AI as well.