We built an entire civilisation around the idea that more information would make us wiser.
We have more information than any humans who ever lived.
We are not wiser.
We built an entire civilisation around the idea that more information would make us wiser.
We have more information than any humans who ever lived.
We are not wiser.
@Daojoan Yup. Cue one of my favourite Douglas Adams quotations, from Last Chance to See (1990):
"It's easy to think that as a result of the extinction of the dodo we are now sadder and wiser, but there's a lot of evidence to suggest that we are merely sadder and better informed."
@Daojoan We should be wiser with artificial data, like AI and ultra-processed foods that diminish every generation's capacity, for deciphering the lesser, from the greater.
Ignorance truly is, the ultimate enemy.
@Daojoan well put. Information is just a tool and doesn't define wisdom at all. We still need to contemplate it's use, act upon it, and habituate that action to become wise.
In the age of LLMs it's easier than ever to jump straight to an "I sound wise" solution without the slightest modicum of depth and the result. Aristotle pointed to this same problem in Nicomachean Ethics when he discussed craft labor and Phronesis and drew the same conclusions.
Maxxed out Int, forgot to raise Wis.
Actual wisdom: "Know how to recognize fascists, so you can fuck them up"
@Daojoan This is the main thing I'm wrestling with as I work to contiinue loving humanity honestly.
It's relevant to note that the information age is still very young however. There's a huge proportion of the population still who grew up without it.
We are unquestionably wiser*
The fact that a relatively small number of bad actors have used the tools of information to build obscene wealth and power for themselves doesnโt negate our wisdom, but it does expose the vulnerability of our social structure which, I think, is based on an assumption that the many good people can/will stop the few bad.
So wiser, or better informed, doesnโt necessarily mean we automatically have a better society.
*In my opinion. Not claiming to be the sole arbiter of wisdom, etc.
@Daojoan That really isn't the fault of the people reading the information. No-one made the caveat 'you have all this information, but you need to avoid everything eye-catching, engaging, or anything that speaks your language to find the truth'.
It's entirely the fault of the parasites abusing the free-information paradise to spread brain rotting dark pattern ruled social spaces and political brainwashing.
noise vs. sound
signal to noise ratio
Because we do not want to.
the original vision was the #internet would usher in a golden age of knowledge, and therefore enlightenment
the problem with easy connectivity though is it does not only connect people with knowledge bases
it also connects people with each other- in regards to the pridefully ignorant and bigots, and it connects them with propaganda and disinfo bases
@benroyce
Right in the beginning there, it really did
I recall the joy of reaching out directly to researchers and experts, and get real info right off the minds of the people doing the stuff.
It was the kind of jaw-dropping thing where you could ask about Fresnel zones in a microwave data link that you were experimenting with in an underground diamond mine in Africa, and OVERNIGHT, some guy in Kiruna would send you info.
For a moment, it was magical
And then the AOLers arrived
i did the same
thing is you can still reach out like that
but now you have to cut through a ton of cruft first. and the knowledgeable you eventually find are more reticent to reply, considering the mountains of bullshit they are dealing with as well
I kind of agree - except that it wasn't the AOLers that spoiled it, but the moneygrabbers.
The internet as it was in the early days is still there, but the slop created by the moneygrabbers has buried it.
LLM slop is just the latest kind of slop.
I could go on, but the basic problem is that whenever someone tries to make money out of a service, enshittification is guaranteed.
The moneygrabbers followed the AOLers like rats follow roaches
When the AOLers arrived, the tone shifted, there was more bluster, more flamewars, and soon it was hard to get to real info because of all these loudmouths running around and being sex pests
Then the grifters arrived, because that's where the herd of prey had gone, and soon your email and messageboards were filled with ads and come-ons that drowned out the guy in a research lab in Finland
"For a moment, it was magical --
And then the AOLers arrived"
Plot for a horror movie
@Daojoan There's a cognitive bias in the base idea.
It's like saying someone died of thirst while adrift in the ocean, and desuming water isn't that important. Or that drowning results in water being always dangerous.
What is relevant is how information management has been shaped, and the methods and capacity we have for assimilation, as with water.
We are suffering from 'Information Overload'. Excess of anything is bad.
@Daojoan Some of us probably are.
But the problem is that even if most people could never recognise wisdom.
Actually, it could be argued that we have always know this problem, and thus went to great lengths to form complex systems of accredition that serve to point people towards real wisdom.
Then we tore it all down in a decade.
We also have more slop, bullshit, lies, and billionaires. Coincidence? I think NOT!
free speech is not enough when the systems we use mean most people are having their attention hijacked. when the wealthiest can interrupt us with whatever they choose and our lizard brains get played by algos like we're constantly in the supermarket checkout lane and surrounded by tabloid content.
the endless info/opinion/art environment of the web requires an attention management system that works for us. the best I've got is we do it together ala fedi etc.