Perhaps I am some kind of dangerous computer radical these days, thinking that one should be able to buy or make a computer, install one's choice of OSs and software, create a local user account, and get on with one's affairs, privately and without interference.
Quiet enjoyment of one's computer.
* No age or ID verification
* No jumping through hoops to install software, or third parties restricting the software that one can run
* No third party accounts
Y’know @neil one of these days you’re going to wake up and find you’ve become a revolutionary anarchist, relatively speaking.
Same here. My opinions remain fairly constant, but the Overton Window almost keeps rushing past.
> you're going to wake up and find you’ve become a revolutionary anarchist
Wow. I sound *sexy*.
@RandyNose @neil https://youtu.be/P5mtclwloEQ
(I remember when this came out in 1991, people were wondering whether the video might be hinting at queer sexuality. And yeah, maybe??)


This was drawn to my attention today by commentator John Boxall. It was in The New Statesman in 2023: In 1962 I was a Conservative. I believed privilege could only be justified by service, high taxes on very high incomes were necessary to prevent an entrepreneurial economy becoming a rentier economy,...
@Bishopjoey @jannem @slothrop @neil
The more the world shifts right, the harder I feel I need to push in the other direction.
Free healthcare, UBI, no billionaires...

@neil There is exactly one person who gets to decide what happens in my computer. Me.
If you want to run things in my world, you play by my rules and only my rules.
Wait Shit. Am I'm turning in to a conservative, I want things to remain how they were twenty years ago... Is this is what they meant about getting more conservative when you get older?
conservatism in my opinion is about “keeping the systems that control others in place”.
This sounds like you wanting to keep control over your systems in place.
Similar sounding, but completely different.
A 2018 comment by one Frank Wilthoit defined conservatism sublimely:
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:
There must be in-groups whom the law protect[s] but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288
Give the world's dangerous slide into extreme right politics, and fascism, using your computer like it's 1999 is seen as radical and anarchist.
Welcome to being radical and anarchist by being the same socialist you were in 1999 😂
Edit: If you think Windows is bad, try setting up a Mac without linking your identity to the device.
Pro Tip: Buy the device with cash and never give the salesperson your email address or mobile number. Good Luck 😁👍
@neil I have never used my full name when setting up my user on a personal Linux device.
I generally give computers hostnames that do not identify the devices type.
My email addresses to do not include my name nor parts of my name.
My online usernames are unique per site and do not contain references to my real name.
Not that this helps much with device fingerprinting as it is today but I feel I have to try to do something.
Every act of resistance counts.
@neil It is a war on general computation. Cory Doctorow observed that about 15 years ago.
Skews the balance of power even more towards platforms.
Computation is power!
@neil and I've been really disappointed by people who I generally respect coming back with the argument "you're not a parent are you? Do you know how hard it is to stop a kid from breaking out of parental controls when the goal is to join their friends on Roblox or whatever?"
I do get that. But it seems like the classic "we have a social problem here. Let's not try to fix it with tech"
@neil
I believe a distinction is necessary between using a computer as a personal tool and using it as a means of communication or for economic activity, which require adulthood and other forms of accreditation to operate in the market or in society at large
and it may be necessary to assume legal responsibility for economic activities
> I believe a distinction is necessary between using a computer as a personal tool and using it as a means of communication
I don't!
"using it as a means of communication or for economic activity, which require adulthood..."
We had phone boxes where you could communicate with anyone without proving you are an adult. Long before that, we had (and still have) post boxes, where anyone can post a letter to anyone else without having to identify themselves.
The idea that communication is an activity which suddenly needs identification of all participants just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Age restrictions on the potential victims - while the perpetrators are free to download the tools for abuse from the various app stores.
@neil it's sad and disturbing that this has become a radical position.
My first computer, in the early 90s, was a pizza-box Mac (LC II). It was ... alright, but it was too limiting - very little internal space and limited (expensive) options for configuration or upgrade. I had sold my game systems so I could buy it (with help from my parents - I still couldn't afford the whole thing on my own).
It was the only Apple product I've owned.
I ended up selling it later and buying a used system from family friends. An Intel 286 in a massive desktop chassis. That system saw many changes over the years to both it's hardware and OSes (dos/windows/various Linux distributions). It was certainly a PC of Theseus - only the original chassis remained.
The experimentation and learning, the tinkering, the ... magic smoke. It helped make me who I am today.
This experience should be available to everyone now. I hate that things have become so integrated, locked down, and gated.