We need to separate “tech” companies from videogames. This level of ghoulishness is insufferable. This is not progress in visual tech. This is defacing of an art form by people with ugly souls.
We need to separate “tech” companies from videogames. This level of ghoulishness is insufferable. This is not progress in visual tech. This is defacing of an art form by people with ugly souls.
@wombatpandaa They are, in fact, repeating marketing nonsense from Nvidia without challenging it. On every platform they sell this as the future of in-game lighting, they talk about how this doesn’t artificially change anything in game, and that it somehow restores the original creative intent that gamedevs were unable to implement themselves.
But thanks for letting me know that this doesn’t pass your threshold for shilling.
@wombatpandaa Hey, I appreciate that you've reached out! It seems that DF themselves have somewhat walked back their tone from the video and the article, and the team is split in opinions and concerns.
I'm sorry if my own response was too harsh. This crap makes me very upset and angry, and I do not feel there is a lot of space for the middle ground anymore.
@yurisizov wait wait wait wait wait wait wait
DLSS changes the model's design??????
worse of all, it looks like ai slop
@yurisizov besides everything…
I can’t imagine trying to design the scene to look like the creative vision if you have a toggle to change the appearance so dramatically!
@DKesserich They’ve been disappointing for a long time, yeah. And I can’t really tell if this is them cowardly making sure Nvidia doesn’t blacklist them (like they do with honest reviewers), or if they are genuinely completely apathetic to the art form rendering tech is supposed to be made for.
Either way, games are like empty benchmarks for them. Not something to be appreciated.
@yurisizov so anyone can soon slopify/yassify any game at the very cheap cost of just a whole nother highend graphics card! 🧟
That's one way to try to increase your sales, I guess... 🤦♀️
@JigenD Why? And why does it matter what you think is qualified to be the end result of someone else’s creative process? Open the article, if you will, there are screenshots from other games, including the new RE. Even if you are somehow an authority on what constitutes finished art, I’m sure that example will be sufficient.
But like… What the fuck is wrong with you? Hell!..
@yurisizov The idea that everything that already exists is pure and complete and perfect and new things are to be shunned and hated isn't a new one, but it is a bad opinion to have.
There's some objective problems with the tech they showed off, and some imagined ones by the community, unfortunately. I probably wouldn't call it 'good enough' to get the DLSS title, but I also think it is objectively improving the fidelity 80% of the time.
@JigenD @yurisizov this has nothing to do with "complete" or "incomplete". you're assuming the point of art is to just keep iterating towards some weird ideal perfect realism bullshit.
the issue is that this is just replacing actual art with auto-generated slop bullshit, leaving no room for actual artistic intent in the first place.
@joshg @yurisizov There is objective truth here. Correct lighting is better, anti-aliasing is better, correct shadows are better, and lighting that illuminates polygons correctly is better.
No artist intended these incomplete aspects of real time 3d game graphics.
These are objectively more complete, and to not have them is incomplete.
@JigenD
Then all those games where you shoot Nazis or Gangsters or whatever, will be revamped in real-time to shoot women with blue hair, or Black dudes raising cardboards asking for justice.
There is an issue at stake here.
And I mean, why stop here?
Let's apply this filter to all Pixar animations, anime, cartoons, and so on. These can surely be rendered in a more realistic way, after all. It's not like anyone cares about intellectual property or art any more.
And someday, those guys will have nice glasses and, with a click, they will apply a filter on the woman they are having sex with. And they will have reached their goal.
2/2
@yurisizov worse even: #nvidia did a crudged-up version of #SLI in that the #DLSS5 was done with a SEPERATE #RTX5090…
WHO THE FUCK IS THEIR ADRESSABLE MARKET WITH THIS SHITE???
That's awful.
@yurisizov A slap in the face to artists and designers. "Fuck your artistic intent, pore count is the only measure of aesthetic appeal"
This has nothing to do with lighting technology either, what are they on about
It looks like fucking trash, how could they possibly think this would fly?
Investors who’ve poured trillions into anything related to so-called “AI” demand a return. Companies are under intense pressure to deliver that return. Many will fail. It means companies will resort to, stoop to, desperate, thoughtless attempts at lock-in in pursuit of profit. I think this latest nVidia news is a play for consumer and game industry lock-in, even though the public smells the enshittification right away.
@yurisizov the old "tech problem": just because it's an interesting engineering challenge doesn't mean you need to solve it.
paired with the old "sales problem": some idiots will pay for it, right?