@cR0w Honestly... this probably ties back to ownership and accountability in some really weird ways.
If the computer system was someone's domain under which they had control and accountability, would they feel antsy enough to enforce a switchover? Or to start a switchover project?
@schrotthaufen @cR0w the more one-sentence, plain english you can get, the more it will land. you have to be authoritative and matter-of-fact about it.
"look. you can trust them, or you can trust your staff. if you trust them, youre screwed when they fuck up. if you trust your staff, you have someone whos job is on the line. the person who job is on the line will care more about their work than some random cloud engineer"
@Viss @schrotthaufen @cR0w I’m a fan of pitching it as quality control. Outsourcing something (including outsourcing your hardware and hypervisors) is saying quality just isn’t that big a deal to you.
There’s a reason Apple started designing their own processors, and Facebook started designing their own network equipment. There’s a reason Netflix runs their CDN nodes on their own hardware. They care about the quality, so they bring it in-house.
@cR0w Okay, seriously, there's something I _really_ don't understand.
In the 90s, a startup would just run from a computer under a desk. Colocation would come when you expanded, and you'd rely on DNS.
It was orders of magnitude cheaper than cloud hosting is now.
Why does everyone pretend that you _have to_ use cloud hosting?
@cR0w The most confusing thing lately is hearing at work how we're one of Microsoft's bigger AI customers like it was something to brag about.
Why would you be proud of being scammed harder than others?