@crmsnbleyd @f4grx @nixCraft The biggest issue with open source phone OS'es currently (at least to me) is that they're incredibly lacking in terms of hardware support. Not even the "feel free to install, but if you've got weird hardware you're on your own", but rather, the line currently tends to be "if you do not own one of these 17 specific devices, you cannot run this OS. Period."
It's hard, I've owned my phone since like 2021, I don't intend to upgrade for several more years, but I don't like the way Android is going currently either. But if the hardware isn't supported for FOSS, there's not much I can really do.
@riverpunk @f4grx @nixCraft you're in the same boat if you want to buy an iOS phone ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯
I do wish the device support was wider. I would love to be able to know enough to port something to my phone.
@crmsnbleyd @f4grx @nixCraft right but that's kind of my point, isn't it?
Like, we're not gonna unfuck ourselves from digital hell by just like, making the "correct" consumer choices. it might help, but the world we exist in is so incredibly biased to make it difficult to run these FOSS OS'es for mobile.
The proper solution is necessarily going to have to be a structural one, something systemic. I don't like the way that the common refrain to all problems caused by unregulated capitalism as it intersects with tech is always just "switch to [Linux/Graphine/etc]", when clearly the problems are far deeper entrenched than that. I want people to think first about the systems, and only secondarily about small scale ways they can alleviate some of those systemic pains.
@pluralistic has a great blog post about enshittification being a systemic issue rather than an individual choice problem: https://pluralistic.net/2025/07/31/unsatisfying-answers/
@riverpunk @crmsnbleyd @f4grx @nixCraft I have wondered if the solution to obscurity and complexity would be to make the manufacturer liable for return or repair of a product which "does not function as described."
That description is hard (NP hard) for phones.
Of course, if the source code is released, and it is reasonably legible and well engineered, that's the full description.
In the end, we have to get politicians to push on a few, appropriately simple, and hard-to-avoid pressure points if we are going to fix the situation.
@crmsnbleyd @f4grx @nixCraft postmarketOS is the only true alternative here, if it supports your devices. Graphene and Lineage are still android, and still depends on AOSP which google constantly undermines.
Tho yeah if you want something consumer grade Androids advantages are all just gone at this point.
@nixCraft This is a good idea BUT
Alternatives exist like #lineageos #grapheneos and a bunch of others that will allow you to actually own your device and it's data, that will allow you to sideload apps until your heart is content, that will empower you to screw Google.
If you continue to not be able to sideload because of #Google, use that as motivation to explore these #opensource alternatives. #SetYourselfFree
@Rastal @nixCraft I use both, but there are critical apps like bank apps, which are required as 2FA by the banks, that do not work on those :((( Seemingly here in France there's a legal 'loophole' to put the onus on the bank, but I'm not sure that applies everywhere.
Yes, alternatives exists (like Linux for Windows), and they're really good, but they do not cover all cases :(
This is on a wrong layer.
We were able to install any app, because Google let us.
We shouldn't need their agreement in the first place.
If we do not control the OS we do not control the apps. This new policy is just a side effect.
@nixCraft s/sideloading/installing please. Enough with doublespeak.
We want to keep the ability to INSTALL APPS ON OUR PHONES.
@nixCraft The feedback and public consultation periods in the EU ended on October 24. The cited website doesn't reflect this yet.
You can still send feedback to Google. I doubt it will change their position.
Alternative Android-based OS are good, but they also face the restricted market access to the needed developer resources (see their development blogs etc. for more info). Therefore, consumer protection and competition authorities are the right bodies to be addressed here.
@nixCraft this is all niice but even if y'all can stop google now, they'll try again in a year!
The only sustsainable way forward I see is to have a mobile OS, be it something new, postmarketOS or an android fork... where the entire ecosystem is not controlled by a mega corp!
"Sideloading" is the new jaywalking, a term invented in the early 20th century to criminalize pedestrians by car makers.
@nixCraft The dependency on big tech is one of the reasons for me not to use banking apps at all. I use a separate TAN generator to create security tokens for me. For this to work I also needed to order a girocard from my bank; it costs about 12 bugs per year.
Since the Visa debit card which the bank pushes forward doesn’t work with the TAN generator.
Girocard is a German specific, I know. Unfortunately I’ve no idea about the availability of similar services in other countries.
@nixCraft
There’re also concerns that #LineageOS and other open source phone operating systems cannot support all hardware devices.
For me, 99% of all devices aren’t eligible at all for human rights reasons. For me, human rights come before performance, features and so forth.
The only manufacturers being considered for me are @Fairphone and @shiftphones. Maybe there’re a few others.
(I’m not involved in those companies at all, I’m just a user.)
@nixCraft Even if they comply, that’d be a short term and weak solution.
The only real solution is helping and donating to postmarketOS, and fight for laws that obligate companies to allow us to unlock the bootloaders on our devices before more of them start to block this. Preferably they should also allow for relocking using the users own keys. Apps should also be forbidden from requiring stuff like safetynet or google approved devices.
I wonder if this would affect phones using either LineageOS or GrapheneOS.
Also, from an earlier article (see link), I wonder if development of such alternatives may become more difficult.
In March 2025, Google announced that it was moving Android development to a closed environment. Now, it has made some changes to the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) that could signal the […]