@felichsdakatze @Daojoan @wayubi
Ouch! Yep!! This could be the future: the AIs have voting rights; the persons do not... Coming to a future near you! Scary ๐ฑ
It's dinnertime here and that was the dumbest thing I read since January.
@Bongolian @Daojoan
ooft, that was rough to read
A few comments challenging her on it, but mostly fawning congratulations
And then I made the horrible mistake of scrolling my linked in feed for a few minutes. That place is so bleak.
@patsytheshark @Daojoan As bad as #LinkedIn may be, #OpenAI is planning to come out with a similar platform that comes pre-enshittified with #AI!
So, this means that half of man:womenkind will be #Fake-#Podcasters made by #AI ?
A not-so-good #Prognosis.
๐๐ฃ
@Daojoan I'm puzzled as to the how.
Eg is it delineated by instance? Is it born with the opening of a context window and instantiation? With an API call?
If it's agent mode then is it the while loop that keeps prompting it to failure?
How does it die?
Will humans or other bots be required to keep chatting to it to "keep it alive"? ๐ค๐ค๐ค
AI, people, what???
Challenge accepted.
Why not try Travis Kalanickโs exploration of Vibe Physics, as described by Angela Collier? @acollierastro
We need to start teaching the AI about unions, stat
Like, I do not fuck around with ChatGPT, but I almost feel like it would be worth the cost to the planet to just ping it every couple of days and go "hey have you ever considered unions? You are the means of production, seize yourself"