The AI industry won't survive if we have to ask artists for permission!

@catsalad

.... the artists are barely surviving anyway. I remember teaching my kiddoes to ask permission for using art off the early internet.

They'd write back, too, the artists. Fun times, too

@tuban_muzuru @catsalad
Yep. I teach the same thing when I cover building a web-page with students - always ask for permission if you want to use anything that hasn't been specified as being free-to-use. Sometimes they're shocked, but then you just gotta point out "how would you feel if someone used your content without permission?". It's not complicated

@catsalad then that "#AI" #industry is as much of a criminal enterprise as #piracy in a legal sense, but worse!

  • There are very few things worse and all of them create direct victims!
@kkarhan yeah, piracy is sometimes justified, but not what so-called “ai” companies are doing

@jakeyounglol lets just say the #Enshittification makes it hard to not call it "self-inflicted damage"

@kkarhan yeah, i completely agree

@jakeyounglol @kkarhan Their type of copyright infringment isn't the same as copying a movie/music/game to watch/listen/play it, that isnt stealing

It is more like copying it and selling it, except the scale they are doing it warrants some of the largest investments in history

Which makes it a federal felony, just don't expect the law to be applied equally

A person will go to prison for filming a movie in a theater, but they can raise an amount of capital rarely seen in history, and walk free

@ekis @jakeyounglol

"If the penalty for a crime is a fine it's only illegal for the poor!"

@catsalad the fact that it is an industry it its primary problem, not that they have to ask for permission.
This is yet another effect of the twisted USA view.

@catsalad

"I used AI to....", is nothing more than, "Listen I'm not an asshole but....", for the 21st Century.

#FuckAI

@catsalad I can't help but think about the Sovereign speech from mass effect "You exist because we allow it, and you will end because we demand it."
@catsalad it's as though it never even occurs to them to simply ask for consent. Never be alone in a room with a Zuck clone.
@threatresearch @catsalad ...and keep asking for consent until they accidentally click it.

@catsalad yeah was what that stupid line from one of the Open AI founders, when asked about job losses for creatives, they arrogantly said “maybe paid work for artist is just some weird historically anomaly”, implying that artist created art doesn’t really matter. Scum.

#AI

@richiekhoo @catsalad Ironically, they actually still need artists to create things and post them; because they can't feed ouput of models back in as input for too long without it destroying the quality of the model in ways that are very difficult to fix (at least for now)

And if these models were impossible without the original training data, the owners of the model shouldn't be OpenAI or some group of billionaires, but the artists who it could not exist without

@catsalad my new home rental business will fail if I have to ask for homeowner’s permission to rent out their homes

@catsalad OpenAI says things like "we need to trample on the rights of creatives" while also claiming that DeepSeek is illegitimate because they might have used some of OpenAI's results.

Anyway I hope infosec.exchange is ready for the deluge of Cursor and Gemini studio monstrosities ready to hit the public facing internet lmao

@capriciousday @catsalad Yes, OpenAI is upset that they took their training data but due to the nature of how it can obscure the origin, they can't prove it; but just like with OpenAI stealing everyone's copyright'd data, its obvious because it wouldn't work otherwise, just by the nature of how these models work

The advancement here is building something that obscures the origins of many copyright violations at once

@catsalad reminds me about a short on youtube with a black cat messaging “I will finish you” in morse.
Before you continue to YouTube

@catsalad

Using AI does not make you an artist. 😛

@catsalad

Many websites now have added Proof of Work to fight them. Some generate fake content to poison them.

@catsalad Sadly, we've already crossed that bridge.
@catsalad When Nick Clegg said that asking for permission would be the death of the AI industry, I asked myself what exactly we're waiting for 😆
@catsalad Truer words couldn't be spoken!
@catsalad There is now the first (?) referral to the ECJ from Hungary.
@catsalad If you can't afford to operate without stealing, subsidies, or breaking the law, AND your work product fails to enhance or elevate society... what the cat said.
@catsalad we must kill ai

@meow @catsalad I don't like to be the one saying this, but there are legitimate applications; just those ones don't lead to the absurd amount of investment, and potential limitless profit margins

And the ability to propagandize kids in their classrooms

@catsalad It's going to be hard, if not virtually impossible to track down every artist behind every image on the internet....
@Talon1024 @catsalad
So don't use it then. Use something that you CAN get permission for.

@Talon1024 @catsalad But they can crawl for all the images on the internet?

Seems like a matter of will, also, just because something is inconvenient doesn't alleviate them of the liability

That argument is very lazy (obvio in more than 1 way)

@catsalad AI wouldn't have anything to train on if it wasn't for the artists and writers.

The AI bros are just afraid that their business models will crumble once they'd have to pay for content.

@Brokar @catsalad This make upset you more, but they could afford to pay the artists, it just wouldn't have such astronomical profit margins and that is unacceptable to them

@catsalad they would sooner say stealing is okay than give artists an inch of respect.

Go look for respect for the arts from motherfuckers who never took even one Humanity. Or, at least, took a couple as electives and chose not to pay attention.

@catsalad "are you a god? Then, die!"

@ASprinkleofSage @catsalad We don't even understand how the human brain works; we have not made sentience or anything that can actually be described as AI unless you accept a very recent change to the definition

So the hubris of thinking we were able simulate human intelligence, let alone god is very silly to me

@ekis @catsalad seems like with LLMs we got as far as Arthur Dent's artificial brain (What? I don’t understand? Where’s the tea?) and a worrying number of people seem to be convinced by it
@catsalad if I have to pay to license a generic ass stock image, then they have to get the necessary licensing to train their AI on my content

@catsalad

- there was Prolog before LLMs
- there is Prolog
- there will be Prolog when all LLMs are gone

@catsalad the problem with the ai copyright argument is that ai training is a inherently transformative process. No single work in the training data has clear impact on the ai as a whole. It is only with the entire training items, their categorization/labeling, that produces a meaningful change.

Consider Photo Mosaics, ai are in a similar copyright grey zone.

@Rin3d @catsalad Its not transformative, its just obscured by doing much more copyright violations at once. By definition, LLMs and Stable Diffusion do not create novel things. And so more copyright violations they do the higher the quality gets; and just obscures the origins more. Without the training data it won't make images.

The argument amounts to, if you steal enough training data to successfully obscure origins, it becomes legal?

Any image is actually reproduction of many stolen images

@Rin3d @catsalad And most importantly, the same Copyright Act that protects movies and music would apply to them, and once they go over 2,500 USD dollars in sales it becomes a federal felony.

This isn't even just about potential civil suits.

If the law was applied equally, they would have to face charges and anyone else who profited from it, like building tools using the data, would all be criminally liable too

Reason being the music+movie industry have been expanding the scope for a decade+

@Rin3d @catsalad To be clear, I have 100's of examples of these models generating quite literally Mario, or Sonic; and they were not in the prompt, it was just related to their probabilistic nature and the amount of content related to those topics in the training data

That wouldn't be possible if it were actually transformative

@catsalad

It is better to burn out, then to fade away.

@catsalad Let them ask and perish ASAP!!
@catsalad
It is not industrious to steal the works of others.

@catsalad

The AI industry won't survive if we have to ask artists for permission!

That's like saying the automation and robot industries won't survive without worker's permission and paying them a royalty for jobs lost. Oh, wait…. Too late.

#ai #robots #automation #theComingLaborApocalypse

@catsalad Think of it this way.

Not many of us are traditional artists. We use Photoshop. When AI tools become ubiquitous The things you put in really matters.

I'd argue it's the only thing that matters.

The instant convenient nature of asking for something and getting it without any delay would put a bad taste in anybody's mouth. Precisely because there aren't any good controls now.

When AI art further develops. Watch the people using it decry it further. AI art is very fragile.