This is unpopular opinion, but for Firefox to live, Mozilla, as it currently operates, needs to die.

They forgot their core user base hates cloud and AI features. They want a simple browser that connects to web servers and displays pages. Meanwhile, executive are getting fat salaries and bounces while begging users for money on AI and other privacy intrusion projects like adding perplexity directly to Firefox. They lost their vision long time ago.

The Perplexity AI will track users for targeted Ads while showing some Gen AI content when you search for something.

The whole point of using Firefox on Linux, or even Windows/macOS or mobile, is to avoid tracking and to maintain safety. How hard is that to understand? Why do they have "tech bro" style executives at a non-profit? They are treating it like a Silicon Valley app where you do everything to collect money. It makes me sick seeing how they are ruining their reputation.

The reason why the old IE versus Firefox match was won by Firefox is because it just did one job: "connect to a web server and display pages," and nothing else. Then these execs hijacked foundations for personal gain, and now here we are in 2025. It is messed up.
@nixCraft and Firefox had cool developer tools (als plugin first, AFAIR, later simply integrated). This made it the "goto tool" for Web-Developers.

@Reinald I kinda wish they'd continued to call the web developer console "firebug" though πŸ₯²

@nixCraft

@nixCraft is this about the integration of artificial intelligence in web browsers because I have not really been following these developments other than a lot of people switching browsers.

is Mozilla considering the same thing?

@XaetaCore @nixCraft Mozilla is experimenting with AI, question is, if they try to force it on the users.

Best practice is, that you use the Fork "Waterfox"

@calvin_thefreak @nixCraft I mean the moment that they tried it isn't there nothing to stop someone from just forking?
@calvin_thefreak @nixCraft it seems that you have already answered my question :)
@XaetaCore @nixCraft just saying "Waterfox".

@XaetaCore @calvin_thefreak @nixCraft The problem with forking is that maintaining something as big and complicated as a browser takes significant effort. Maintenance is not sexy work. If Mozilla keels over, the forks can no longer depend on the upstream doing the heavy lifting.

I do not think a world with just one browser would be a nice prospect.

Keep in mind that, much as I hate what happens in the Mozilla board room, I'm not under any illusions regarding the competition. Especially if you see that most browser makers are unwilling and quite likely unable to make their own engine, so there's only a handful in Mozilla's league. If I ran Mozilla, I'd be hellbent on turning out a code base that would put chromium to shame, but alas, that is not how the dice rolled (and I'd prolly make a lousy manager too).

@bertdriehuis @XaetaCore @calvin_thefreak @nixCraft

The problem is Devs keep forking these monolith projects instead of making the micro-kernal of browsers, where you can plug in any credential system, or bookmark system, etc NOT using proprietary plugin formats.

All the browser should manage for credentials is sending the webpage url to the cred system, and the cred system providing a list that the browser interprets into a dropdown on whatever form for autofill.

Monoliths = pain in the ass

@bertdriehuis @XaetaCore @calvin_thefreak @nixCraft Would not be surprised if firefox ends up dying and its role is taken by GTK and Qt webkits based on de-googled Chromium
@calvin_thefreak The question is also if they can do it everywhere, e.g. against the EU Digital Act and GDPR. @XaetaCore @nixCraft
@calvin_thefreak @XaetaCore @nixCraft I'm using fennec for Android and I like it a lot. :)
@djdiskmachine @XaetaCore @nixCraft yeah, Fennec and Waterfox is one of the best combos.
@nixCraft Firefox sole purpose now is to exist on Google's money, so Google can show it's not a monopoly. They can dance naked and have 0 developers, nothing would chage. They could have made a good browser, but no.

@nixCraft 100% agree

I would like to add that a substantial part of the funding for Firefox is coming from placements, mostly Google for beeng the default search engine.
Alphabet is interested in keeping Firefox alive only so that they dont get slapped on the wrist for having a monopoly with Chrome. They certainly dont want Firefox to be any better.

As long as there is no more ethical funding source i dont have much hope for Mozilla going in a better direction.

If there was just something like the EU putting money into things that could make it more indipendent from large american AI-enshittifying billionaire companies...

@sco_tty The #EU is putting money in #OpenWebSearch but it takes time to develop it: https://openwebsearch.eu/
They are also investing in #openSource solutions: https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/eu-oss-catalogue

#search #EuropeanAlternatives

Welcome - OpenWebSearch.eu – Promoting Europeβ€˜s Independence in Web Search

OpenWebSearch.eu – Promoting Europeβ€˜s Independence in Web Search

@NatureMC @sco_tty

That is cool thanks for sharing it. However, I couldn't find anything regarding the developement for a web browser. That is a shame.

@alper_yeg That's because not everything must be made by the state. πŸ˜‰ Search for #EuropeanAlternatives or follow @european_alternatives to get more European stuff before you cry about a shame.

We have two browsers made in Europe, @Vivaldi (Norway) and Mullvad (Sweden): https://european-alternatives.eu/category/web-browsers Mullvad VPN which can be combined with the browser is also on Mastodon @mullvadnet

@sco_tty

European web browsers | European Alternatives

A web browser, also called internet browser, is an application that allows users to access the World Wide Web.

European Alternatives

@NatureMC @european_alternatives @Vivaldi @mullvadnet @sco_tty

I am not crying about anything. Let me rephrase to make it clearer, I wish there would be a browser engine developed in the EU. I am living in the EU and support EU developed tools. Additionally, I am aware of the alternatives.

@alper_yeg @NatureMC

There is a browser engine being developed in Europe, it's called Servo and it's being built by Igalia.

https://linuxfoundation.eu/newsroom/servo-web-rendering-engine-joins-linux-foundation-europe

People from Igalia are already contributing a lot to the development of other engines like Chromium, Firefox and WebKit.

https://www.igalia.com/technology/browsers

But Servo is not ready yet, it'll take some years (?). They are accepting donations though: https://opencollective.com/servo

Interview about Servo: https://www.igalia.com/chats/servo

Servo web rendering engine joins Linux Foundation Europe

Servo, the independent, modular, and embeddable web rendering engine written in Rust to nurture a stronger European open source ecosystem .

@ueeu

This is great! I will check it def out. I hope this will then be integrated into other or even new web-browsers.

@NatureMC @alper_yeg @european_alternatives @Vivaldi @mullvadnet

To be fair, both Vivaldi (based on Chromium) and Mullvad (based on Gecko) are great browsers, but none of them develop a browser engine of their own nor can they afford to deviate too far from their upstreams without causing much more maintenance work.

This will only keep going well as long as the engines themselves are not enshittified (remember Chromiums change from Manifest V2 to V3 and implications on Adblockers?)

@sco_tty @nixCraft Mozilla hasn't really changed direction in the last couple of years, they're still headed right down the toilet. The only difference I can see is the speed at which they are falling.

I have my doubts that they've reached terminal velocity yet... tho one can hope that there is a chance for them to figure out the parachute and even reverse course!

(My Β£0.28 would be on not tho imho)

@nixCraft

I've said this before, but I'd happily pay $5/month for a maintenance fork of the current Firefox ESR that focuses only on security, bug fixes, and maybe performance.

*But only* if the people doing it are reliable and have the in-house resources to do this stuff correctly. That's the problem.

This is what I use for banking, so maintainers *must* have top-tier security people and testing infrastructure or I won't trust them.

@suetanvil @nixCraft Mullvad is such a fork.

@suetanvil @nixCraft That fork of the ESR would immediately fall out of support from websites, including banking, as soon as another ESR comes out.

We’re in the Internet Explorer era again. #lang_en

@nixCraft I wonder if it can be hijacked back.
@nixCraft Just use forks such as Floorp or Zen. Even LibreeWolf is also better. I tried Zen few days ago and went through their whole privacy policy. It's really good.

@tasinone @nixCraft

After reading this I installed Librewolf:
- On Win 10 (so far) it seems great
- On Win 11… not so much. Had to immediately uninstall, not ready for primetime.

Disappointed.

@ArdentArchivist @nixCraft Sorry to hear that. I do not use Win11. I don't even use the official Win10 πŸ˜… You might wanna check ZEN browser. It is new in the field. But I warn you that it is different from all other browser and you not like it. You can check youtube review.

Personally, I use Vivaldi, Brave, and Floorp.

@tasinone @nixCraft

Cheers, I’ll take a look at those. πŸ‘πŸ‘

@nixCraft yeah just make a plain generic secure and fast browser and let the forks fork it with different features.
@visnudeva @nixCraft I think that's the approach @servo it trying to go with, but I'm not sure I got that right and it's way too early for viable forks to even exist yet

@jnk @visnudeva @nixCraft Given how much progress @servo has made in the last couple years (https://servo.org/wpt/), it's really the project I'm watching out for a future alternative.

Of course WPT tests may not be an accurate measure of how far you are from a fully usable & secure drop-in replacement browser, but given how fast Servo progresses with orders of magnitude less resources than Mozilla, there seems to be quite some scaremongering in "Firefox would die if Mozilla lost its 500M$ revenue" (not entirely surprising considering how much of that money is poured into execs pay & satellite features users don't care about).

WPT Pass Rates - Servo aims to empower developers with a lightweight, high-performance alternative for embedding web technologies in applications.

Servo is a web rendering engine written in Rust, with WebGL and WebGPU support, and adaptable to desktop, mobile, and embedded applications.

Servo

@gendx @visnudeva @nixCraft @servo oh I'm definitely keeping an eye on them, and I really hope many potential browser developers are too!

IMO Mozilla needs to survive juust enough time for this to mature a bit more, then they can f^ck right off πŸ‘‹

@nixCraft

It's about where the money is coming from. If we really want a community-directed browser, it'll have to be community funded.

Otherwise, the sponsors will get what they ask for.

@nixCraft oh welp.. Time to get another throw-away account.

Thx for sharing!

@nixCraft

Perplexity is optional.

@nixCraft konqueror and Epiphany haven’t disappointed in 20+ years
@_XCM
Interesting!
Can you please tell something about their ability to show the latest CSS-features?

@nixCraft
@fasnix @nixCraft
Konqueror struggles with CSS3, but epiphany fares better on that side.
@_XCM
Thx, good to know!

@nixCraft
@nixCraft I agree on all your comments. What should we use until Mozilla dies though? 😞
@nixCraft
'Embrace, extend, and extinguish'? 🀷
Who knows...

@nixCraft

Very concerned to read this, and equally outraged.
BUT is this a stealth addition, no trace or mention of it in the Settings? Because I just updated on one machine and did a fresh install on another: locked them down like I normally do, and there is no hint of anything AI anywhere in those settings. Nada. Zip. Zilch.
Which would make it even worse!

Is Perplexity something that is coming down the pipe, not yet spewed forth upon the masses? Or is it out in the wild?

@ArdentArchivist @nixCraft It'll just be another option in the list of default search engines, and yeah, in the pipeline still as far as I can tell.

Separately, Perplexity are making their own browser that will have lots of spying. but that'll be a Chromium fork.

@ArdentArchivist @nixCraft Agree with though, Firefox will be better managed by someone not Mozilla, who don't seem to get what their own software is for at all.

@pre @nixCraft

Good to know. I’ll tell it to take a flying fornication right along with Bing, eBay, Google etc.

πŸ‘πŸ€£πŸ‘

@nixCraft β€œnon profit” is a tech bro way of saying β€œwe’re lying about where our profits go”
@nixCraft
Firefox: We're not just ruining our product, we're also ruining our reputation!