I still think it’s backwards that mass shooters owning assault weapons is considered a right while their victims’ healthcare is considered a privilege.

@Strandjunker Only in the US of BS-A..

At this point the world kinda thinks laws in the US are made against the people instead of for

@stux @Strandjunker i wonder why they would think that

hmm 🤔

hmmmm  

hmmmmmm  

HM. 

@Strandjunker

If you think of politics in terms of sadism, it becomes a little clearer.

@Strandjunker Nobody is saying the government should buy the mass shooter an assault weapon.

Rights in the American sense are negative - things that society cannot do to you. Taking away your assault weapon was included in that list, because the British tried to do just that and it kicked off the American Revolution.

Yes there should be subsidized health care for the poor, but that is not a "right" in the constitutional sense.

@mike805 @Strandjunker You’re saying they cannot arrest you for speaking your opinions out loud? The right to free speech. Gone.
@MrInappropriate @Strandjunker In the UK the right of free speech is definitely gone. In the USA that dispute is not yet settled.
@mike805 @Strandjunker No, they did not. The right was listed specifically for those who were enlisted in a well-organized militia because at the time we had no standing army. If you’re not in the army, you really don’t have that ‘right’. Now, get off the toilet, you’re stinking up the timeline.

@Catawu @Strandjunker Oh I'm going to take a dump on that particular timeline whenever and wherever it appears.

The Minutemen who showed up at Lexington and Concord were volunteers with their own weapons.

However, most of the gunpowder was kept in a public magazine so peoples' houses did not blow up.

The Redcoats arrived to confiscate that, there was a standoff, and the rest is history.

There was no list of people who had that right. All able bodied men were potential members of the militia.

@mike805 @Strandjunker All able bodied men were trained and in a well-regulated militia. People like to forget that part, that the weapons were for and only for WELL REGULATED MILITIA… those who were fighting against the Brits. We had no standing army at the time. Now, wipe your ass and get the fuck off my timeline.

@Strandjunker

What's an "assault weapon"? Not a rhetorical question.

@LevZadov @Strandjunker

In the parlance of the gun debate
and bear in mind that includes people who are gun experts as well as not, an "assault rifle" is one which allows the user to fire multiple shots at multiple targets before targets have time to react.

Otherwise, you get into inane arguments about magazine capacity, range, reload mechanism, demons in the end of the barrel...that kind of inane gaslighting.

#2A #gundebate

@n_dimension @Strandjunker

Words have meanings.

An assault rifle , by definition, has a selector switch that can select for full automatic. If a weapon cannot fire full automatic it is not an assault rifle. It's something else.

I have a 12 Gauge pump action shotgun which allows the user to fire multiple shots at multiple targets before targets have time to react. It's not an assault rifle. It's a much different device.

I've never shot anyone with it. I never needed to. I popped a trunk lid once and asked if they *wanted* trouble. That was enough. They didn't.

I didn't even have to brandish it. They didn't know what was in there. Just the possibility was sufficient. That's the power of firearms.

@LevZadov @Strandjunker

Aaah....and you went there...

The demons at the end of the barrel are only relevant in cases where holy emperor decreed heretics as the valid targets only.
(The gaslighting bit of my comment)

@n_dimension @Strandjunker

That's not gaslighting. That's the truth of the matter. Gaslight, by definition, means a very specific form of lying. I didn't lie at al. I told the truth. Ergo, it's not gaslighting.

Accusing me of something I didn't do, on the other hand, *is* a lie. Stop lying about me. Stop lying about guns. Stop lying about the English language. Words really do have meanings.

@LevZadov @n_dimension @Strandjunker Oh honey, I hope you are being paid well to come on here and troll in a way that someone thinks will stop people from speaking against gun ownership of assault weapons. Pull out that little dictionary, the one next to your little dick, and lecture us all one more time.

@[email protected] @n_dimension @Strandjunker

I do not tolerate ad hominem attacks in my timeline. This person is blocked.

@LevZadov @n_dimension @Strandjunker So, you were only pretending to be incredibly stupid so you could split hairs on definitions of weapons of war in the hands of civilians!
@LevZadov @Strandjunker Yeah, you just landed on the planet, right?

@Catawu @Strandjunker

This person insulted me, and in a childish manner no less. They're blocked.

@Strandjunker I have been told that having assault weapons everywhere would make it harder for authoritarians to take over and rob us of our rights. I would very much like that to be true.
@Lyle @Strandjunker
The plan doesn't seem to be working as intended. Like, not at all.
@Strandjunker Both can be consider as right, although health is more fundamental as humans right, owning a firearm does not automatically make you a psychopath.
@Strandjunker It’s a very American mindset. “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to be charged for every breath they take”
@Strandjunker Two of the main reasons I choose not to visit the USA.