If there are going to be climate-justified subsidies for owning electric cars, there should be subsidies for not owning cars at all.

@humantransit

Absolutely. We already have them--public transportation is already subsidized--but IMHO they should be free to the rider.

https://www.wired.com/story/free-public-transit/

The Case for Making Public Transit Free Everywhere

From Spain to Germany and Luxembourg to Estonia, more and more countries are experimenting with fare-free transportation.

WIRED
@nobilis @humantransit It should not be free, because you cannot subsidize not using public transportation (or using it less). Instead of subsidies, the Polluter pays principle should be applied. All forms of transports should be pro rata taxed based on pollution.
@bart @nobilis @humantransit 👍 Don't tax citizens and then give it back to those not harming the environment. Tax activities that harm the environment. People will find creative ways for people to do all the things they love (travel, heat lots of living space, have fun toys, etc) without damaging the environment.
@humantransit public transit should be subsidized even more than EVs.
@humantransit Case in point. My country provides a 4700 USD subsidy for purchasing EVs. This amount of money would pay for full public transit coverage in the capitol city (buses, trams, subway, light rail) for a single person for 18 *years*. It defies logic.

@humantransit

The first would be free public transit!

And I want a subsidy for an e bike!

@chu @humantransit any kind of bike should be subsidized. But I would settle for a tax rebate of €2000/ yr for any person over 16 that does not own a car.
@chu @humantransit IMO vastly more important than being free/low-cost, the service's quality should justify itself to the users -- availability and quality also drive demand! Many people choose to drive a car because public transport is unreliable or don't go where they need/want to go.

@o_andras @chu @humantransit Yes. This, 100%. For most destinations in the UK, it's cheaper for me to drive than to take a train, even if I'm alone. When there are two or more of us, it's not even close. Driving is also much more reliable.

I want that fixed, and I'm prepared to pay more tax to make it happen.

@mike @o_andras @humantransit

In Canada, there's a transit penalty. It takes longer, is not reliable, and costs a fortune.

Taking the train to Ottawa from Toronto cost me $700 for my family of four last year. It would have been cheaper to rent a car.

But my federal government insists they are the most pro environment party. My prime minister marched with Greta Thunberg no less! (Then approved an off shore oil well within weeks).

@chu @o_andras @humantransit Sadly, I don't think much of that is unique to Canada 😠
@mike @o_andras @chu @humantransit Price or Speed or Ease-of-Use, pick at most two.
@bdatlrides @o_andras @chu @humantransit Except that the promise of public transport really is all three — price through economies of scale, speed through use of infrastructure better than regular roads (bus lanes, train tracks); ease of use is where where is some justification for falling down, but things like the London tube show it can be done right.
@bdatlrides @mike @chu @humantransit which of those two would you say Switzerland ticks?
@o_andras @mike @chu @humantransit For the area of Switzerland I visited, which is near Zug, from what I recall, it was ease of use and price?
@bdatlrides @mike @chu @humantransit unexpected! I was in Genève and would classify as ease-of-use + speed, at least. I don't know about price because tourists staying in licenced lodging get a free pass for the duration of the stay (although it's 100% an honor system so...)

@o_andras @bdatlrides @mike @humantransit

I don't know where reliability fits into the equation but I think it's even more important than speed. I can handle the trip being an extra 20 minutes as long as I know it's coming

@chu @o_andras @mike @humantransit Good point... then would reliability translate into overall travel time/speed?

@bdatlrides @o_andras @mike @humantransit

Not sure. But I'll give you an example. In Switzerland I took something called a "post bus" to a middle of nowhere town. It was an hourly bus, but you could set your watch to it.

Frequency and reliability matter so much.

If I could wasn't on vacation, hourly won't do. That's too much bending my life and day around. But the reliability made me rethink especially considering how far it was from anything. In Toronto, you often wait 20 minutes for the bus that says 10. People drive because it's subsidize compared to transit.

Why take transit when it's cheaper to park the car?

So it's not just a matter of price either. It's price relative to other options. Nobody takes transit as a family. It'll run as much as $28 Cdn for four when parking is often free.

@chu @humantransit I'm ok with no subsidy, what I need is a path to do my errands on that isn't shared with two ton masses of metal driven by tired and stressed people

@humantransit if you have your driving license taken away by doctors then you qualified for disabled rail card (1/3 off train and tube) and free off peak bus use. If you choose not to buy a car, have never had a license or don’t drive for any other reason: full price

If you have no intent ever of driving you could consider declaring yourself unfit to drive (sleep apnea, perhaps) just for the discount. Though if your bus service is FirstBus it’s hard to justify the effort

@humantransit Uk perspective, obviously. It’s just ironic that the system gives people who are medically unfit to drive -myself included- more support on public transport costs than people who choose not to drive
@humantransit Someone needs to pay me $500/mo not to drive or mine crypto.
100% serious
@humantransit As an electric car owner, I approve this message!
@humantransit yeah, that would cover my yearly check-up of my bicycle! Or new walking shoes.
@humantransit I'd rather have higher registration fees for all cars and have them somehow tied to impact on roads and environment. A smart car that gets 35 mpg and weighs a ton should not cost as much to register as a 1-ton pickup that gets 11 mpg and weighs 5 tons. The cost of a hybrid could work on the same formula and a full electric would have to have a different structure.
@humantransit And while I'm on this soapbox, municipalities should not be allowed to (or should be discouraged from by voters) lump all "transportation" into the same bond or mill levy on a ballot. I vote against them all because they don't even tell me how much is going for bike lanes & public transit, but I fear if enough of us did, we'd be destroying the village to save it. Better still, don't pay for roads out of the general budget, pay for it out of the registration fees.
@humantransit @breadandcircuses never owned a car, so getting a kick, etc. I think not owning a car at all should at least get you a free public transport pass. Very reasonable I think, especially since I also still pay taxes for car infrastructure I never use.
@xerge @humantransit @breadandcircuses Also, your not driving resulted in less cost because less wear and tear on roads. Not to mention all the social and environmental costs associated with cars.
@xerge @humantransit @breadandcircuses this! Plus you should be getting good pedestrian infrastructure too!
@humantransit my city had at least some if you got rid of your car, which I found nice
@humantransit "Not paying insurance/title/registration/maintenance" is a pretty good one, I dare say.
@humantransit
Would love me a bicycle subsidy.
@humantransit @jmichaelward who exactly will be lobbying for that and how will they get to the meetings?
@humantransit @Catfish_Man I’m an EV owner and I approve of this message

@humantransit @Catfish_Man
Brah, we’re still trying to stop oil subsidies 🤪

https://fortune.com/2023/08/24/fossil-fuel-subsidies-1-3-trillion-record/

But hey… I know where we might find 1.3 trillion to get started!

Governments pledged to end fossil fuel subsidies. Instead, they’ve doubled down since 2020, hitting record $1.3 trillion

Since the war in Ukraine, government support for fossil fuels has surged. When implicit subsidies are counted, the total is $7 trillion.

Fortune
@humantransit “here’s $10,000, go buy a bike that wouldn’t look out of place in the Tour de France”
@humantransit Yeah, just send money to the car producers to not produce vehicles. It's the most carbon neutral way to keep the industry.
@humantransit We have some subsidies for bicycles, though you don't have to give up the car altogether to qualify. But I don't know how effective they are - I sort-of get the impression that the bicycle subsidies will mostly be attractive to middle class already-cyclists who are quite happy to get a cut price better bike.

@humantransit You already save money by not owning a car at all.

Despite giving subsidies, governments still get money from EV owners. Taxes on buying them to begin with, fuelling to a lesser extent, etc.

And depending on the country those subsidies are quickly dissappearing. In the UK there's practically none with the last one dissappearing.

@humantransit Absolutely!

Reminds me a couple of years back here in The Netherlands where drivers who would frequently drive a certain busy highway got paid if they stopped using that highway, while I, who never used it in the first place, never got a penny!

@Africano @humantransit

Totalmente de acuerdo. En España te dan ayudas a la compra de un vehículo (hasta 7000 euros si entregas el viejo y 9000 euros si lo achatarras) pero no te dan ayudas por achatarrar un vehículo sin comprar otro.

@humantransit
How would that help to subsidize a crucial decarbonization industry?

@humantransit +9001%

I think people should be offered #FreePublicTransport if they have no driving license and/or no #car in their possession...

Personally, I'd make any subsidies basically antiproportional to MGW/Net Weight ratio, Capacity, Deadweight and price, to incentivize not #SuperUselessVehicles, but #PersonalLightVehicles.

  • This should then get the highest subsidies for people choosing a bike or pedelec, followed by (cabin) scooters and like #SmallCars like #KeiCars, capping the subsidies at 3500kg MGW / 1500kg Dead Weight so that even edgecases like families with a lot of children are not completely empty-handed.

Ideally also #UsedVehicles are eligible as most people just can't afford a new one and incentivizing #Repairability, #UseLonger & #ReUse as well as #Upcyclibg over new production is more envoirmentally friendly.

Personally whilst I'd wish every village hat 24/7 15min cycle public transport access, I also acknowledge the unavoidable edgecases, which is why I propose #PersonalLightVehicles:

  • Since energy needed for transporting is (in ideal cases!) mass × speed ^ 2, and since we can all assume that a Vmax ≥ 130km/h is deemed the lower limit of what would be seen as acceptable to flow in traffic globally, keeping mass low & minimize drag aka. 'air resistance' in terms of design should be mandatory...
GitHub - KBtechnologies/PLV: Personal Light Vehicle - Specification

Personal Light Vehicle - Specification. Contribute to KBtechnologies/PLV development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
@humantransit AFAIK, most public transit is subsidized, no?
Federal Government increases bicycle allowance for commuters

"More cyclists on the way to work means fewer traffic jams, more fit workers and fewer CO2 emissions," said the Belgian Mobility Minister.

@_noelamac_ @humantransit i was just thinking about this - but in theory for the US, didn't know it was reality elsewhere

@humantransit In the red states they tax us for having an EV and not paying gas tax. I guess non-owners should see the same?

#BadLogic
#DumbAllOver

@humantransit That's, essentially, what should go into public transport making it cheaper/free.

@humantransit

I'd like to cash in my chit for 50 years of not owning cars, please?

@humantransit
> If there are going to be climate-justified subsidies for owning electric cars, there should be subsidies for not owning cars at all

I think those are called subsidies for public transport, active transport infrastructure etc ; ) But it sure would be nice to get the same percentage discount when buying a bike, especially an e-bike.

@humantransit
Agreed. There should also be subsidies for:
Not flying
Not using Generative AI
Not using crypto
Not having an air conditioner

A lot of us po' people would be doing alright if we actually got rewarded for our environmentally friendly lifestyles.

@humantransit In Ontario we call it Fee and Dividend. Car less people get same carbon rebate as everyone else, despite that they didn’t have to pay any Fees on gasoline.
@humantransit Free bicycles for people with no registered vehicles. Free registration for motorcycles. Tax the hell out of cars and trucks. Subsidize mass transit.
@humantransit well said. But also, there needs to be some way of accepting that some of us (eg. me, bus driver, having to get to work before the bus can get me there) should be recompensed for having a car that rarely does 60 miles in a week. Since I get free bus travel as a perk, it makes even less sense for me to drive when bus is possible. Oh, at my usage, it's going to be a while yet before electric vehicle makes economic sense.
@humantransit
Yes, the government should reimburse us 100% of the cost of the car we aren't buying