@gruber Not sure if you used Texts, but it asks for accessibility features to control your screen and then uses that to automatically click a system pop up asking for elevated permissions to see your messages data. I get why they thought that would be more seamless for the user, but it left a bad taste in my mouth.
Really wish these apps didn’t feel so awkward.
@matt this was my idea. we ask for accessibility first and automate certain permission prompts, all to reduce the number of clicks in the onboarding experience and make it as low friction as possible. i now realize this can feel jarring. with a future update, the auth screen will tell you this is going to happen before it does.
also, accessibility is primarily needed to make imessage work on macOS, since that's the only kosher way of making it work without asking for your apple ID/password.
Why doesn’t Apple ban electron apps?!
Or at least provide users a way to systemically disable it?!
Jesus, what a dumpster fire.
@nyquildotorg @gruber @kraigschmidt ah, that makes sense, it was just confusing to see that statement on Electron iOS in the context of 'webapps pretending to be real apps use a lot of resources'
Edit: And I should add that, again, the android ecosystem of repackaged webapps looks just like the iOS one, despite not having the browser engine restrictions
I wasn’t jesting at all. Don’t get me started on the DoJ and DMA. I’m brutally angry.
I want Apple to be *more* restrictive, not less.
I want the wall of the garden to be higher and stronger.
Apples not perfect, but they care more (which is to say, at all) about the user experience than anyone else, because that’s the business model they’ve chosen.
There are examples everywhere even with their success Apple *still* can’t persuade companies to do the right things for UX…