Threads is the most fun, most interesting new product of the year, and no one in the E.U. can use it, or will be able to use it anytime soon, because their own elected officials passed a law that effectively bans it.

Nice job. Have fun over here in the library.

@gruber ah yes, damn those EU lawmakers for… *checks notes* …creating laws around privacy. How dare they 🙄 Next you'll tell us they trying to protect human rights or something, the fools!
@stroughtonsmith @gruber “We tried to invent the Torment Nexus but now the EU is going on about some European Human Rights court and saying the mind shredder feature is illegal?! This hardly seems fair to our shareholders”.
What would ever have happened to my privacy without a cookie acceptance banner on every website. @stroughtonsmith @gruber

@party @stroughtonsmith @gruber I highly doubt the cookie acceptance requirement is what’s preventing Threads from launching in the EU. The cookie banners may be an unhelpful outcome of GDPR, but the fact that GDPR is preventing a Meta product from rolling out in my mind is proof that GDPR actually is protecting people.

I’d happily take useless acceptance banners if they came along with useful regulations and restrictions about what companies can do with data about me. #privacy

This is why I love this platform, everyone has a great sense of humor. @emc @stroughtonsmith @gruber
@party @stroughtonsmith @gruber sorry if I missed the sarcasm. @gruber’s apparent disregard for privacy regulations triggered me.

@emc Cookie banners are separate from GDPR. What GDPR asks for is a legal basis for processing user data in general.

Cookie banners are necessary only for privacy-invasive shit, not for functionality the visitor expects (e.g., sessions, shopping carts). Ditto, GDPR consent is only necessary if it's not required by the functionality the users/clients ask for, most commonly privacy-invasive shit.

People complaining of banners miss the forest from the trees.

@party @stroughtonsmith @gruber

@emc case in point: open any #Mastodon instance. Witness no cookie banners and no GDPR consent form. Also, notice no trackers blocked by uBlock Origin 😉

Back in the day, hackers seemed to care more about freedom and privacy. That spirit seems to be dying, replaced by the normalization of US-flavored spying on a massive scale.

I still remember Snowden's revelations or the Obama administration claiming non-citizens have no rights. Well, the EU reacted.

@party @stroughtonsmith @gruber

@party @stroughtonsmith @gruber That cookie banner that does not work correctly when my ad blocker is enabled.
@stroughtonsmith @gruber plus hating EU laws is only allowed for EU citizens, as per directive 2005/372/c
@sbesselsen @stroughtonsmith @gruber Glad to comply - after #brexit I immediately stopped hating any EU laws 😢

@stroughtonsmith @gruber Steve on point!

These are the moments when I don’t understand my American friends’ affinity for Wild West capitalism…

John, that same EU guarantees me that I have free healthcare in any EU country. If I break a leg in Germany or Spain, I’ll be treated the same and will not pay for it.

@michael @stroughtonsmith seems right in brand for someone who made a living out of corporate fanboyism
@michael @stroughtonsmith @gruber yeah, wow, it’s almost as if those are two different policies with different trade-offs.

@michael @stroughtonsmith @gruber Take note, it makes only sure that you will be treated like a local.

Interestingly, how healthcare is handled is more or less up to the MS.

Thus the Irish have a healthcare system that is a mix of the European and a bit of the US one, forcing anyone above an income threshold to get a private insurance. (Which can lead to long waiting times when existing preconditions are uninsured.)

@stroughtonsmith big agree. just gonna leave this here.
@stroughtonsmith @gruber It's almost as if Meta created the problem and could've chosen not to if they wanted.
@stroughtonsmith @gruber I’m flummoxed by this Gruber toot… wtf?
@john @stroughtonsmith @gruber usually agree with most things Gruber but this one makes no sense to me
@chechoribero @john @stroughtonsmith @gruber I’m not sure this involves Grindr, though? Unless I’m very, very misinformed about what that is?
@allintensiveporpoises lol it was a typo, already fixed it tho!
@chechoribero I figured—just giving you a hard time!
@stroughtonsmith @gruber Don’t worry they don’t care for human rights.
@stroughtonsmith @gruber thanks Steve for writing a perfect version of my thoughts. We can discuss about the "quality" of the policy, but at least they're trying. Ah, and by the way, privacy IS a human right
@stroughtonsmith @gruber sadly I don’t think EU lawmakers are driven by privacy. That’s just their good excuse to try and have Europe catch up. GDPR has been mostly a bureaucratic facade. Don’t even get me started on the cookie banner…

@pfernandes @stroughtonsmith @gruber You’re permeating the lies of surveillance capitalism. Europe isn’t catching up to anyone; GDRP is a strong, world-leading protection of privacy. And the cookie banners exist only due to malicious compliance by the surveillance capitalists.

https://icosahedron.website/@bitbear/110096967238156119

#surveillance #capitalism #cookie #banner #gdpr #privacy

Asbjørn Ulsberg (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image @[email protected] @[email protected] The popups aren’t required, though. As long as the cookies are needed for the site to function, and are not used for data harvesting, analytics, or similar, implicit consent is fine. The consent only needs to be explicit if the site is harvesting its users. https://blog.getadmiral.com/cookie-consent-law-in-eu-us-uk-and-other-countries

Icosahedron

@pfernandes @stroughtonsmith @gruber

I have been in the room when tech teams have had a good hard look at their databases, and set expiry polices on old tracking data. Why? GDPR compliance.
The knock-on effects in data leaks that never happened is large.

Characterising GDPR as merely bureaucracy and cookie banners is shallow and wrong.

@anthony_steele @stroughtonsmith @gruber again, sadly, I have seen a lot of paperwork, procedures and goodwill but little enforcement, gross violations by governments/lawmakers, banks, telecom companies, you name it. All the paperwork is being produced but behind the scenes it’s another story.
GDPR, CCPA, etc.. are undoublty important but imho educating the end users and leading by example is even more.
@stroughtonsmith @[email protected] Won't someone please think of the poor billion-dollar, multinational corporations?! (/s)
@stroughtonsmith @gruber that’s not the only way to look at it. Products can compete. Some will handle data differently than others. Customers can choose.
@stroughtonsmith @gruber or they’ll make sure that people can actually use mobile data in other EU countries without going bankrupt. Babarians!
@stroughtonsmith @gruber The EU is a fun-sucker for doing the bare minimum to protect user privacy, but also TikTok should be banned-by-legislation, is, and I say this as a voracious Daring Fireball reader for almost two decades now, an absolute dogshit take.
@stroughtonsmith @gruber i usually agree with @gruber but this is one of his worst takes 🤮
@stroughtonsmith @gruber Sounds suspiciously like that 'pesky legislation' standing the way of submarine 'innovation'.
@toon @stroughtonsmith I don’t think that Ana old holds water. Submarines: lives at stake. Threads: not. Also, at a technical level, Meta’s engineering and backend scale are best of breed.
@gruber @stroughtonsmith legislation and regulation are not only useful and worth upholding when lives are directly at stake. Laws to regulate banking, vehicle emissions, and, yes, the use of sensitive personal information, all have a place in creating a fair society. Many companies seem perfectly able to abide by those laws, too. Not sure what the technical acumen of Meta has to do with this. It doesn't grant them a free pass, in any case.
@gruber @toon @stroughtonsmith Meta has destroyed and cost orders of magnitudes more lives than all submarines combined.
@stevenodb @gruber @stroughtonsmith not directly, though, and even then, I don't think that 'people are getting killed' should be the determining factor to decide whether a law/regulation is beneficial.

@toon @gruber @stroughtonsmith Sorry for taking us further off topic.

What’s interesting to me is that John seems to have a bigger problem with the EU than Meta. A company that has shown repeatedly it cares more about profits than the privacy and wellbeing of its customers.

I sincerely wish Threads never arrives in the EU. Some may be excited by this new toy, you know who’s excited most? Zuck. That should give anyone pause.

@gruber @stroughtonsmith
Standing with @toon and @stevenodb here : https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/16/podcasts/the-daily/facebook-sri-lanka-violence.html

True, engineering and backend scale can be state-of-the-art - yet typical ethics behaviour is to stop marvelling at those once you see it used for malpractice.

Privacy in the EU is a feature, not a bug.
Could be a cultural thing - but therefore not to be thought lesser of. I'm sure we can delve up topics to reciprocate !

Listen to ‘The Daily’: When Facebook Rumors Incite Real Violence

A wave of violence largely directed at Muslims in Sri Lanka, fueled by inflammatory Facebook posts, provides a stark view of social media’s real-world consequences.

The New York Times
@aertsbe @gruber @stroughtonsmith @stevenodb Yeah, the 'oh you silly backward Europeans' attitude is a bad look.
@gruber I've been following your work since 2007, love the site and the podcast. I really don't mean this in a dickish manner: how do you reconcile Facebook “A criminal enterprise” and Threads?
I guess you can find the EU's too anal about privacy AND find that Facebook's criminal. But why make that point on the back of the Threads launch. Facebook will fuck its users. It's in their DNA. https://daringfireball.net/linked/2020/04/04/facebook-nso-group @toon @aertsbe @stroughtonsmith
Facebook Wanted NSO Spyware to Monitor iOS Users

Link to: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/pke9k9/facebook-wanted-nso-spyware-to-monitor-users

Daring Fireball
@gruber This post was re-shared today, I thought it was a recent event. But the question stands. @toon @aertsbe @stroughtonsmith