@realcaseyrollins @tomw
You want to believe that.
Honestly, it's a probability calculation around the expected value.
If the costs of a crash are lower than the costs of lowering the probability of such a crash, it makes no business sense to try to lower the probability of the crash.
That's why you need regulation with punishment damages if you care about making things safe.
In most jurisdictions on this planet the costs of a human life are a joke (and that includes most Western countries).
I'm ready now.
@tomw It depends. Virgin Galactic has killed two staff when one of its vehicles crashed, and the safety of its (not-quite-)spaceplane has certainly been questioned.
On the other hand, SpaceX has been doing space tourism with the same launcher and capsule that NASA has been flying its own astronauts, so it meets NASA's safety qualifications.
@tomw @lisamelton maybe from some new entrants but you need approval to launch that isn't needed for sea ops and most rockets and capsules that could be used are angling for NASA contracts sonate held to a mich higher engineering standard.
There will be some fatal accidents, for sure, but nothing as janky as this "sub"
Ditto for manned Mars landing.
Guess so. Mission to Mars, with Musk on it…
All this stuff seems a perversion…
@tomw Well, it varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but the cost of human life locally is “criminally” about 15-20 years (life for murder which normally equals to 15-20 before they kick you out, that's basically the max.), “civilly” at about €1000-€10000/head damages.
With these numbers in the back of your head, what are the probabilities of customer death that you must be willing to live with to run a profitable business?
But there are many who will feel perfectly save on a space ship en route to mars with Elon on board, because he is a genius.
Golgafrincham Ark B for billionaires?