This will upset some, but it needs to be said.

People keep asking when the right will wake up and denounce their worst reactionaries.

It’s not same scale, but progressives have a similar challenge. When will we stop letting our most reactive, anonymous people define us?

I’m a progressive. So much so, I ran for congress on universal health care, working class economics, addressing structural racism, and legalized marijuana and sex work.

The difference isn’t in our ideals, it’s in our behavior

2/ I do not know a single person doing actual work on the left that it's at their wits end about the crazies.

I do not know a single person doing actual work on the left that doesn't have some degree of trauma from abuse by our own side.

Here’s the truth. Your behavior has destroyed the mainstream perception of progressives. We’re not seen as champions of the working class.

We’re seen as a bunch of self-righteous assholes. You are in the business of dividing us over the most petty nonsense

3/ Every single person on the left I know with actual power I know is tired of your bullshit. I’m inviting you to grow up.

There is not going to be a moment where you scream and people on the right and center have an epiphany and realize you are right and they are wrong.

If you are serious about change, you have to work for it. The same way every other successful progressive movement in history has worked for it.

4/ You say you want a glorious revolution, but it's the normie Democrats showing up to canvas and phonebank. It's why they win.

Another thing. We need to learn to let things go. Every difference in perspective is not a crisis. We amplify every minor disagreement like it’s a moral failing.

Politics is about addition, not subtraction. We have to work with people who see the world differently.

5/ My hands are not clean on this. I've certainly done my share of reactionary, non-constructive bullshit on Twitter.

But, I also think that gives me credibility to publicly say, "This is not working. We have to do something different."

And here’s why I’m speaking up now.

I think you are vulnerable.

6/ People are tired of the drama, the bullshit, the moral indignation over small differences. This is the moment we can have a culture shift if people speak up.

The left has always had to work twice as hard as the right. We have to be twice as strategic, and we’re punished twice as hard for mistakes.

Our Twitter activism culture is cancer. And I am done being bullied into silence over it.

@briannawu This is mastodon....
@JPellat @briannawu Still applies, since many folks on Mastodon also are / were on twitter. We know what she's talking about AND she's making a good point here.
@briannawu we used to be Big Tent and welcomed every one in, those days seem gone and there are so many small tents claiming to be the one true tent. Each day that passes the Overton window moves further to the right and we lose more ground. :( you’re spot on in your assessment.

@matt_crognale @briannawu

Precisely. It's the Overton Window. To the rest of the world, a lot of the "left" in the US seems to be moderate conservatives cosplaying as progressive, because the window has been dragged so far to the right that people that would formerly have identified as centrists are utterly adrift.

@briannawu OK. That is a statement worth thinking about. Thanks.
@briannawu From a high level point of view this all sounds great. But then the rubber hits the road when everyone draws a different line in the sand. One person's small difference is another person's red line. Who gets to define where that line is?
@ReflexVE @briannawu Drawing red lines doesn't work. As an activist, you need to differentiate between what is the work you want to accomplish, and what are your emotional needs that you need to get help with. Red lines are part of the emotional needs bucket, not the work bucket. Of course we need to not traumatize each other, but that cuts both ways. Red lines can both be legitimate emotional needs, and also traps for well-intentioned other participants. E.g. https://theintercept.com/2022/05/08/maryland-campaign-brandy-brooks-progressive-accountability/
The Implosion of a Democratic Socialist Campaign

Brandy Brooks, an equity consultant running for Maryland office, was well-positioned to resolve a harassment complaint by a campaign staffer and friend. Mediation was successful — but it fell apart anyway.

The Intercept
@ReflexVE @briannawu That is not to say that your emotional needs aren't valid, but work is work, and expecting your co-workers to be your primary resource for satisfying your emotional needs, and feeling betrayed when they fuck up, which they inevitably do because we are all human, weakens the organization. So it's really important to keep the two separate to the degree possible.

@abhayakara @briannawu A red line is something like "Are we going to defend trans folk or are we going to sacrifice them to gain aceptance for lgb folk like we did for generations?"

That's not an 'emotional' need, it's a red line.

Or how about whether or not we'll let unrepentant sexual harassers like, say, Al Franken, back into party leadership?

Again, not emotional, it's a red line.

@ReflexVE @briannawu I will probably be crossing a red line by saying this, but if you have a bunch of TERFs who will help you with something you and they both care about, and they don't insist that you agree with them about their TERF awfulness, do you work with them on the thing you mutually agree on, or do you not, because they are assholes. That's what I mean when I say red lines are problematic. The world is full of assholes who give a shit about some of the same things you do.
@abhayakara @briannawu I will never ally with anyone who dehumanizes others. Full stop. If your cause requires the assistance of TERFs, racists, homophobes, fascists etc, it's time to rethink your goals and strategies. Working with them, even for noble goals empowers and legitimize them.
@ReflexVE @briannawu Forget about allying with them. Would you try to get their vote if they didn't demand that you agree with them?
@briannawu @abhayakara no, as a decent human being I would never court the bigot vote. Is that a serious question for you???

@ReflexVE @briannawu The TERF problem is a really big problem, and I honestly don't know what to do about it. What's going on in the UK is horrifying.

Would I try to connect with those people who are currently TERF voters and change their minds? Hell yes. Would I pretend not to disagree with them to get their vote? No. Not worth it.

@abhayakara @briannawu There is no outreach worth it aside from education. I wouldn't court the vote of racists bit I would certainly attempt to educate them on that topic.
@ReflexVE @briannawu Franken's behavior was disgusting. He shouldn't be elected to public office again. Not because I don't believe in atonement or forgiveness, but just because it isn't a smart idea. I don't expect him to get a nomination again, but if the Democratic party tries to help him to get one, that would definitely be inappropriate.

@briannawu @abhayakara A smart idea? Vs taking sexual harassment seriously especially when the harrasser has done nothing to admit much less atone?

Finding your choice of wording revealing...

@ReflexVE @briannawu Revealing of what? I said I find his behavior disgusting. I still think it's quite possible that the Democrats might push him as a candidate again. That speaks to my disgust for the Democratic leadership, not my support of doing such a thing.
@briannawu @abhayakara You keep speaking of these issues in strategic rather than moral or ethical terms. That is the issue I am having with your responses. Doing the right thing is always more important than winning.

@ReflexVE @briannawu This is exactly the problem. Look, suppose Trump is running against somebody who's got a strong voting history of supporting Big Pharma and the banks, but is generally likely to do a lot less harm than Trump.

Morally, voting for him is indefensible if your morality is all about appearances. But if what you care about is results, then voting for him is really not even a choice.

@ReflexVE @briannawu It is a rare privilege to get to vote for a politician who isn't problematic. I haven't gotten to do it very often. If voting matters, we have to be very careful about how we think about "morality" as it relates to voting.
@briannawu @abhayakara I gave my red line. Nobody who dehumanizes. It's a pretty low bar. Have only once not had a candidate to vote for.

@ReflexVE @briannawu I think you're fooling yourself. How many candidates have you voted for that approved increases in the military budget? Approved importing goods from countries with really bad human rights records? Approved invading sovereign countries because they were evil?

I've almost never gotten to vote for a candidate I was sure wouldn't do that. Even Becca Balint had to kowtow to the military. That's dehumanization: saying it's okay to kill someone you disagree with.

@briannawu @abhayakara You are inventing a strawman to argue against. I have been very precise about my red lines. None of those are it. Furthermore the issues Brianna raises are not those either, honestly.
@ReflexVE David, it's precisely this kind of divisive unpleasantness that she's talking about. You're not trying to find common ground with me. You are trying to find reasons that I'm wrong. Everything that I say, you find some way to make it sound like I'm a terrible person, and not someone with his own valid viewpoint that might be different than yours. You can't build coalitions this way. I am not even remotely your enemy, but you're treating me like one.

@abhayakara Your 'common ground' started with the assertion that red lines are inherently emotional, as opposed to logical, ethical or moral, then proceeded to invent a scenario where I could achieve some progressive goal by allying with TERFs but not agreeing with them, and followed up by suggesting that if there is a common goal they should be appealed to on that basis.

The only way you appeal to a group unified by hatred of something is to...agree with or decline to oppose that hatred.

@abhayakara @briannawu Trump dehumanizes large swaths of the population. The other person isn't ideal but isn't a fascist. Easy choice.

@briannawu I feel like there's a big overlap between people in technical/engineering fields, whose strength and important skill is to find any miniscule issue and inconsistency in a system and people who try to apply this to a movement/a political group that should be working together for a common goal.

But in this case, getting rid of inconsistencies doesn't make the system (group of people) stronger, but instead weakens it by dividing it into ever smaller incompatible sub-groups.

@briannawu 💯 the recent furore that led to the admin of the .lol server closing the place down is a classic example of this

@COMPU73E

The "furore" where the admin planning to emigrate to Thailand told users to kill themselves because they posted spoilers for fascist propaganda? (Blood libel and so forth is still regarded as such propaganda.) And then decided to close the instance? Is it a furore because it doesn't affect you personally?

I don't like identity politics but the people in power are pursuing genocidal agendas on such lines so I have to pay attention.

@briannawu

@Homebrewandhacking @briannawu way to prove my point, my guy 👍🏻

[edit] oh I'm blocked now. Literally a perfect example of the type of person the OP was referring to

@COMPU73E
Not a guy. You clearly are OK with antisemitism being propagandised to people.

Doubtless you think you are immune due to your "superior intellect". :) Just goes to show the propaganda about Jewish people and trans people worked very well on you.

@briannawu

@briannawu Thank you for this thoughtful thread - you make so many great points. Clearly both sides are trapped in an endless loop of outrage. I blame social media, where one can spew hate easily without consequences. Thankfully, Mastodon seems to be a forum where more thoughtful conversations like this can thrive.
@briannawu I'm a natural contrarian anytime I see someone being a smug asshole, and I find myself getting irritated and argumentative with online folks on the left even though I agree with most of that platform (maybe not the stuff about flaying your landlord).

@Jackthelion
Eh. It's harmless rhetoric from a powerless group, just like the RadFems were until US money started flooding their coffers. When billionaires start funding the antilandlord movement then they'll be a problem.

It's the smug "both siders" that annoy me personally. Real "apples with M16s" stuff.

@briannawu

@briannawu

By all means, fuck Twitter culture and everyone who possibly can do so and survive should get off there immediately.

But there are always going to be outliers on whom someone can hang a hat. Someone’s going to have a mental illness, for god’s sake. I think it’s more about how to handle that than trying to think we can be respectable enough for the other side to stop demonizing us. That’s their entire MO. They demonize the least powerful among us, and they are quite adept at it.

@briannawu I'd only add that the real work is done locally. If even a fraction of our passion went into consciousness raising activities and uplifting the awareness of the people immediately in our lives and around us, there'd be a lot more folks working with us rather than standing by idly.

I bring my activism into the work I do and within my own sphere of influence by being visible and working to uplift others rather than worry too much about what others on the internet think.

@briannawu This is an interesting post but i find it rather Vague on what its actually about which is a pity.

I Think an important question is what you mean by small differences and who gets to define that. for people not affected by a form of oppression it could be easy to ignore certain differences of opinion as they literally cant See the Problem.

We do need to take that into Account.

@briannawu get back to me when biden does literally a single thing to materially stem the tide of violent anti-trans attacks, both legislative and physical
@briannawu Pettiness and minor differences need to be clarified. People are right to feel moral indignation at leftists and progressives who apologize for the USSR, or idealize modern-day China, or think letting people cross borders freely is a Koch conspiracy, or think formal oppression outside of class struggle is a distraction from class struggle. Any social movement which accepts these positions should fail.
@briannawu the oppression Olympics were founded and continue to be promoted by people who benefit from keeping the majority from unifying against the major causes of thier pain.

@briannawu Thank you. Some pragmatism is, unfortunately, required.

I think we agree that the world is not as it should be, and that our societies have a long way to go. I don't pretend to have many solutions, but I do see some of the problems in out path.

We cannot accomplish change when divided and pushed to the fringes. Change will likely be incremental, and will require a critical mass of mainstream support. We cannot afford to alienate potential allies.

@briannawu Thank you. This is precisely what needs to be said. Precisely.
@briannawu Having been raised among plutocrat conservatives, I can, lamentably, endorse this, as far as those elites: they will not change their minds. The wealthy right have breathtaking self-confidence, and belief both in their rights and abilities to defeat progressive economics.
There will be no '90s president-movie moment where clever rhetoric defeats them. Hard work is the only way to cripple them, politically.

@briannawu this reeks of self-hatred and respectability politicking

We could be perfectly behaved and the mainstream portrayal would be the same. They hate our values, not our behavior.

And why assume all leftists seek electoral change? Not all do.

@jason @briannawu

This is my genuine concern here. I have seen them do this with the most non-radical things.

“We could be perfectly behaved and the mainstream portrayal would be the same. They hate our values, not our behavior.”

Did you watch the Twitter hearings the other week? There was no both sidesing that. I just don’t see it happening.

Have you seen the controversies over Jira? 🫠