This will upset some, but it needs to be said.

People keep asking when the right will wake up and denounce their worst reactionaries.

It’s not same scale, but progressives have a similar challenge. When will we stop letting our most reactive, anonymous people define us?

I’m a progressive. So much so, I ran for congress on universal health care, working class economics, addressing structural racism, and legalized marijuana and sex work.

The difference isn’t in our ideals, it’s in our behavior

2/ I do not know a single person doing actual work on the left that it's at their wits end about the crazies.

I do not know a single person doing actual work on the left that doesn't have some degree of trauma from abuse by our own side.

Here’s the truth. Your behavior has destroyed the mainstream perception of progressives. We’re not seen as champions of the working class.

We’re seen as a bunch of self-righteous assholes. You are in the business of dividing us over the most petty nonsense

3/ Every single person on the left I know with actual power I know is tired of your bullshit. I’m inviting you to grow up.

There is not going to be a moment where you scream and people on the right and center have an epiphany and realize you are right and they are wrong.

If you are serious about change, you have to work for it. The same way every other successful progressive movement in history has worked for it.

4/ You say you want a glorious revolution, but it's the normie Democrats showing up to canvas and phonebank. It's why they win.

Another thing. We need to learn to let things go. Every difference in perspective is not a crisis. We amplify every minor disagreement like it’s a moral failing.

Politics is about addition, not subtraction. We have to work with people who see the world differently.

5/ My hands are not clean on this. I've certainly done my share of reactionary, non-constructive bullshit on Twitter.

But, I also think that gives me credibility to publicly say, "This is not working. We have to do something different."

And here’s why I’m speaking up now.

I think you are vulnerable.

6/ People are tired of the drama, the bullshit, the moral indignation over small differences. This is the moment we can have a culture shift if people speak up.

The left has always had to work twice as hard as the right. We have to be twice as strategic, and we’re punished twice as hard for mistakes.

Our Twitter activism culture is cancer. And I am done being bullied into silence over it.

@briannawu From a high level point of view this all sounds great. But then the rubber hits the road when everyone draws a different line in the sand. One person's small difference is another person's red line. Who gets to define where that line is?
@ReflexVE @briannawu Drawing red lines doesn't work. As an activist, you need to differentiate between what is the work you want to accomplish, and what are your emotional needs that you need to get help with. Red lines are part of the emotional needs bucket, not the work bucket. Of course we need to not traumatize each other, but that cuts both ways. Red lines can both be legitimate emotional needs, and also traps for well-intentioned other participants. E.g. https://theintercept.com/2022/05/08/maryland-campaign-brandy-brooks-progressive-accountability/
The Implosion of a Democratic Socialist Campaign

Brandy Brooks, an equity consultant running for Maryland office, was well-positioned to resolve a harassment complaint by a campaign staffer and friend. Mediation was successful — but it fell apart anyway.

The Intercept
@ReflexVE @briannawu That is not to say that your emotional needs aren't valid, but work is work, and expecting your co-workers to be your primary resource for satisfying your emotional needs, and feeling betrayed when they fuck up, which they inevitably do because we are all human, weakens the organization. So it's really important to keep the two separate to the degree possible.

@abhayakara @briannawu A red line is something like "Are we going to defend trans folk or are we going to sacrifice them to gain aceptance for lgb folk like we did for generations?"

That's not an 'emotional' need, it's a red line.

Or how about whether or not we'll let unrepentant sexual harassers like, say, Al Franken, back into party leadership?

Again, not emotional, it's a red line.

@ReflexVE @briannawu I will probably be crossing a red line by saying this, but if you have a bunch of TERFs who will help you with something you and they both care about, and they don't insist that you agree with them about their TERF awfulness, do you work with them on the thing you mutually agree on, or do you not, because they are assholes. That's what I mean when I say red lines are problematic. The world is full of assholes who give a shit about some of the same things you do.
@abhayakara @briannawu I will never ally with anyone who dehumanizes others. Full stop. If your cause requires the assistance of TERFs, racists, homophobes, fascists etc, it's time to rethink your goals and strategies. Working with them, even for noble goals empowers and legitimize them.
@ReflexVE @briannawu Forget about allying with them. Would you try to get their vote if they didn't demand that you agree with them?
@briannawu @abhayakara no, as a decent human being I would never court the bigot vote. Is that a serious question for you???

@ReflexVE @briannawu The TERF problem is a really big problem, and I honestly don't know what to do about it. What's going on in the UK is horrifying.

Would I try to connect with those people who are currently TERF voters and change their minds? Hell yes. Would I pretend not to disagree with them to get their vote? No. Not worth it.

@abhayakara @briannawu There is no outreach worth it aside from education. I wouldn't court the vote of racists bit I would certainly attempt to educate them on that topic.