The #malvertising campaigns via Google Ads are not just about software downloads and scams. They also include phishing for popular password managers such as 1Password.

The differences are so subtle, most people will fall for it.

Real URL:
https://my[.]1password.com/signin
Phishing URL:
https://my1pasword[.]com/signin

@malwareinfosec You would think this would be fairly easy to stop. Google knows which password managers and services are popular.
@ThatMichaelM @malwareinfosec Why would they want to? The fake ad force 1password to buy an ad, and pay even more to be first, which increase further the price of those keywords!
@malwareinfosec as I continue to shout for more MFA adoption when and where I can. Go vegan too 🏴‍☠️👹🪩
@malwareinfosec that only goes to show that you should not search for your common web tools with google
@alexlehm @malwareinfosec Or at least never click the results marked “Ad” in Google.
@MisuseCase yes, my uncle downloaded his iTunes update once via a Google "Ad" and I spend hours cleaning up his computer afterwards

@malwareinfosec

Thank you for sharing this. This is another reason why:

1) Content blockers are great that elitment these ads so that you are limited to the susceptible malicious features

2) Why Google as a search engine should be taken less and less seriously and alternatives should be sought after. Google search results have been controlled and quality has been declining.

@malwareinfosec the issue starts with url bar = search bar. If i type apple.com i want to load apple.com not search google for appke.com to then stumble on fakeapple.com etc
@afink @malwareinfosec Then take Google out of your search engine list, and deselect the preference to complete or correct URLs.
@thespoonless @afink @malwareinfosec that’s great and all but try telling that to EVERYONE USING GOOGLE!
@afink @malwareinfosec when you search for something programming related and it turns out it's one of those new top level domains, like .app, .map, .data, .open, .next, .storage, .read...
@afink @malwareinfosec people don’t type URLs regardless – most people I observe always just search for '1Password' (or whatever the name of the site they’re looking for it) and hit the top search result (which is, of course, an ad).
@malwareinfosec if you find any more Phishing urls send them to me and will create a suricata rule for them all
@malwareinfosec that’s pretty unacceptable
@malwareinfosec to be honest? I am sorry for users not for company... that plays that way also: when you type "bitwarden" into google... first ad is 1Password
@malwareinfosec more reasons for deploying adblockers company wide
@malwareinfosec To think phishing would never become this sophisticated will be a downfall of my (50-something yo) peers. It was always coming.
@malwareinfosec @epixoip Yep, that is some insidious bullshit.
@malwareinfosec Time and time again media companies opt for short term, profits over long-term viability. Spam has destroyed email, telephony, and social media platforms. It engenders mistrust in a given media, and renders it all but unusable due to the sheer volume of untrustworthy encounters users experience.

@malwareinfosec This, again, is why ad blockers are a necessity.

And yet Google is trying to cripple ad blockers, just for the sake of their profit.

@eonity @malwareinfosec lets make a deal with google: they can stop ad blockers if they accept 100% liability for any negative outcomes.
@malwareinfosec What we learn from this. Stop using google. Google is cancer.
@malwareinfosec That's why people should always run ad and script blockers.

@malwareinfosec yikes. I might have fallen for that. think I'll keep not using google and keep my adblockers enabled...

(as in, I don't think I *have* fallen for it, but I can see how I might be fooled if in a hurry)

@malwareinfosec is it possible to hold google liable for running ads like these that put people at risk?
@malwareinfosec Google says they believe in “don't be evil” but facilitating is okay as long as it brings in the cash flow.
@malwareinfosec adblocking is self defense.. again and again.
@malwareinfosec
It really is remarkable how Google STILL gets away with this shit without being liable for the nuisance they created.
@malwareinfosec 'but there was a lock icon in the URL bar!' --most folks that Google trained for years to look for that ssl lock
@jennyst @malwareinfosec First Image: A google search for '1password' with the top two ad results highlighted, the first being marked as the 'Real' 1password website, the second 'Fake' site 'startonepassword dot com'
Second Image: A compilation of two screenshots, top and bottom. At the top, the real my.1password.com site login page. At the bottom, a fake website which looks nearly identical, but with a blue text box reminder to use a secret key from the emergency kit
#Alt4You
@malwareinfosec @hacks4pancakes remind me again, what’s the best way to report stuff like this? Is there a threshold of reports before the lists are updated? Do the browsers main separate lists that block phishing or hacked domains?
@malwareinfosec @neilhimself We helped triage an incident set off by someone doing a Google search for the Zoom installer. Top search result was a fake site with malware dropper.
@malwareinfosec Looks like a typosquatting domain. It's especially dangerous on mobile because typos are more likely to happen on a "onscreen keyboard" than a physical keyboard.
@malwareinfosec ...and in addition, I guess we can all agree that when you offer a service like @1password you do buy all subdomains as concatenated domains (is this the right word?) as in your example.
@malwareinfosec Honestly this is why I don’t like in browser password managers. It’s much harder to get fished if you’re switching to an app, especially if you’re used to authenticating via biometrics most of the time.

@malwareinfosec that's pretty bad, and with a few simple rules Google could reject bogus ads like that.

I'm not seeing it when I search, so I guess it's been taken down already.

I also think domain name services should bear the blame for a lot of this shite. 1pasword.com should never have been registered. Again, something that a bit of simple AI could block.