BIG NEWS: Pawoo.net, the world's 2nd biggest Mastodon instance, has just been acquired.

The entity acquiring them is the Mask Group, a business that also runs mstdn.jp and mastodon.cloud. They are also active in the so-called "Web 3.0" space.

If you haven't heard of pawoo.net, it's because many instances have de-federated from it.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mask-network-acquires-pawoo-net-070000858.html

Yahooist Teil der Yahoo Markenfamilie

Like it or not, it should no longer be assumed that "volunteers" are running your instances.

The Mask Group, which now runs three large instances "has raised over US$50 million from private and institutional backers"—their words not mine.

Mask Network Acquires Pawoo.net, one of the largest Mastodon instances

/PRNewswire/ -- The Social Coop Limited (Social Coop), the entity affiliated with Mask Network has acquired Pawoo.net, one of the largest Mastodon instances....

@bullivant This is a land grab, pure and simple.

@atomicpoet @bullivant They may try to copy what Truth Social is doing & insert ads within people’s timelines.

Even though there are corporate-owned instances, it is particularly jarring that a corporate overlord assimilates instances now.

But I think we will see more of this for one reason: Twitter is dying, so companies are trying to “buy the next Twitter” instead of building one.

@darnell @bullivant And they'd be mad not to build on the Fediverse. The hardest part about building any social network is validating the network effect. ActivityPub solves that problem.

@atomicpoet @bullivant I agree. We might see corporations target #Pixelfed instances next.

Also, #Mastodon admins are going to receive lucrative offers soon, & some might sell if they are unable to pay operational costs for their servers.

It will become critical for members to support their local servers.

@darnell @atomicpoet @bullivant I wonder what the "comfortable instance size to income ratio" is: where it is pulling in enough cash to cover running costs and time spent (so not needing too much day to day work like moderation) but not too much cash that it is tempting to waste it or sell it.
@darnell @atomicpoet @bullivant That’s exactly why I supported the server I’m on.
@jpreisendoerfer @bullivant I know @SocialCoop (https://social.coop) is a good example of a cooperative.
social.coop

A Fediverse instance for people interested in cooperative and collective projects. If you are interested in joining our community, please apply at https://wiki.social.coop/wiki/Registration_form

Mastodon hosted on social.coop

@darnell @bullivant @SocialCoop

Nice!

Thanks for drawing my attention to it!

I think it would be okay for such #cooperative|s to be #ForProfit (which essentially comes down to support for their members).

Very often, there is an almost immediate reflex to think of a #coop as something which must be #NonProfit.

However, #trade, #craft, #commerce & #service are concepts which are orthogonal to #Capitalism. One can responsably do the first without the latter, even more so in a coop.

🌺

@jpreisendoerfer @bullivant @SocialCoop I agree! A #cooperative would be self-sustainable & prevent a hostile take over from a corporate giant.

@darnell absolutely agree with you that ads are coming to the Fediverse. Not entirely terrible because servers cost money, but I’m very grateful we have alternative funding mechanisms.

Question of “when” and “how much”.

Timeline injection is the obvious route. That gives the possibility of getting boosted into ad-free instances you’re not otherwise welcome on.

I expect instances with ads on the web UI and locked down APIs.

@atomicpoet @bullivant

@darnell @atomicpoet @bullivant I wonder if #ActivityPub is ready for this. How do we converse with people on ad-supported instances without subjecting ourselves to the marketing?

Ad-supported instances will be free but spammy. User base will tend less-technical and less-privileged. If we just de-federate them we will lose valuable diversity.

@darnell @atomicpoet @bullivant One option: protocol level “sponsored post” metadata. Let instances auto hide those. Block instances that broadcast spam without self-flagging. There should be enough good actors for less-privileged users to find an instance that behaves.

Of course, the bad actors will not flag ads. They’ll do sneaky stuff like shove a banner add image onto user’s posts without asking. I’m not looking forward to that.

My #HotTake:

#Mastodon #admins **should** place a _low-power_ #crypto #miner in the #timeline so _some_ of the **distributed** idle-CPU time can be _donated to the instance_ to pay for #hosting costs.

Why: Hosting costs money. Big companies have money, and I'd rather my money be the #voice of my instance than a for-profit.

If it is _opt-in per visit_, then #users **and** guests may (A) #donate towards covering server maintenance costs (and use CPU time and power), or (B) #decline to mine and use the service without sharing CPU time.

Anyone who deems an instance beneficial **CAN** contribute to keeping it alive. On power-constrained devices, users **may** opt out.

- **If you have money, donate to your instance to keep #BigBusiness out of it!**
- If you don't have money . . . hope we get an _opt-in crypto miner_ in the timeline?

Thoughts?
Stereophonic

@whetkey Or they could just donate money‽ 🤷🏾‍♂️
@darnell I'm thinking of people, like myself, who live paycheck-to-paycheck (thanks to economic changes). I have a decent computer, but no money. If I leave my browser open, I'm OK with the CPU giving some "money" to the maintainers of the services I use.
@whetkey Fair point. I guess if your admin accepts crypto then by all means run your idea past them as they might accept your offer.